Six Months into the War – Analyses & Update Part 3 (of a 4 Part Series)

The Collective West AKA ZONE A

Five months ago, on February 24th, Russia began what she called a “special military operation” (SMO). In very simple terms, this is what Russia has achieved so far: Ukraine has lost about 20% of its territory, about 3 thousand towns and villages, half of the gross national product, and a third of coal production. It completely lost access to the Sea of Azov, and traffic through the Black Sea ports froze due to fighting and mining of waterways. The number of refugees has reached 7 million (source).

Plan A

“Loot Russia” was plan A, by first provoking Russia 24x7x365 into an existential armed conflict, then let´s defeat Russia militarily  and change the regime, then balkanize (see map above) the Russian Federation and fragment it into manageable pieces, and then plunder all of Russia yet again just like we did in Yeltsin´s time. Problem is plan A failed miserably on all fronts no matter how much and how well hundreds of Anglo-Saxon experts – the real puppeteers moving the EU-Ukraine strings — planned for it, some of whom still insist it´s only a matter of pressing yet longer and harder. Others say let´s not lose this war, let´s just go nuclear.  Yet others warn that let´s better not try nuclear warfare as Russia, at least today with fully proven hypersonic vector delivery… would also win. Besides, European capitals nearby would be very soft and quick targets.  Furthermore, Russia´s Sarmat ICBM would immediately step into the act able to ´demolish half a continent as the most powerful missile of its class in terms of range and warheads invincible to all existing air defenses´.  And also possible unstoppable latest generation UAV drone fleets already under Russian deployment and/or drone-bot or regular submarines could also nuclear-trigger unheard-of massive tsunamis at every targeted coastline in Western seaboards that ´almost´ land-locked Russia does not have… plus EMP mid-air detonations grinding the crowded Western cities to a halt.  At any rate, plan A took several disciplines and many years of design and training. Also, it took a lot of hard work, many US and UK agencies and hundreds of experts, think tanks,   plans, maps, satellite imagery, logistical research, telecommunications development, and testing, interviewing and questioning of many thousands of Ukraine soldiers and foreign mercenaries, political influencing, and many billions of dollars sending tons of lethal, modern, sophisticated weaponry to Russian enemies … and still plan A failed, and badly too.

Also there was the requirement to gain time for executing all of the above by actively faking compliance with the Minsk Agreements (shamefully sponsored and led by both Germany & France) which was nothing more than a sham precisely to gain time.

With plan A, even Germany broke its long-standing policy of banning all exports of lethal weapons to a conflict zone the instant it agreed to deliver 1,000 rocket launchers and 500 Stinger surface-to-air missiles to Ukraine. Furthermore, German lawmakers overwhelmingly voted to send ‘heavy & complex weapons’ to Ukraine, thus making Germany the easiest, shortest and most probable first strike in the event that thermonuclear warfare with Russia is provoked. Germany could not have picked a better way to most unnecessarily place itself in harm´s way right next to London… or even before London was struck.

 France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and many other states have joined the effort and, led by Germany, have added greater support with whatever including anti-tank, anti-aircraft weapons, howitzers, armored vehicles, body armors, night vision devices, grenade launchers, etc., many/most of which completely uncontrolled and without any oversight actually ended up in the hands of numerous resellers on the “black Internet”, not the Ukraine military. The EU sanctions did not help plan A at all either and, as a matter of fact, all were badly counter-productive. Neither did the addition of “creative transfers” of truly lethal weaponry from Canada. The list goes on and on.

Like many other Western strategic projects, plan A most probably originated and/or picked up critical speed in the UK. Still, the level of US involvement was extraordinary and ever-increasing as plan A kept failing, including sanctions preparation, intelligence sharing, weapons deliveries, and tons of money, bribery included.

 Thus, with plan A failing, Anglo-Saxon plan B is now required. For Russia was not crushed at all under the weight of sanctions and, actually benefitted in more than one way by collecting ever-larger revenues – due to higher induced prices — for smaller volumes of exports delivered. Furthermore any minute Russia could counter-attack with sanctions of its own regarding many things the West needs besides oil & gas & food & key minerals.

There was nothing to lose as the US & UK productive game of yesteryear was already over and done with, ´Made in USA´ does not exist anymore, the gold-decoupled Bretton Nothing “petro-dollar” standard is in terminal crisis, Brexit did not work out at all as the UK had originally expected, and 85% of the world does not agree with them either. Today´s president of the global superpower is permanently confounded by teleprompter and cheat cards telling him what to do and say. Today, the Commander-in-Chief of the by far most powerful military in the world with 790+ military bases spanning the globe and more than 5,000 nuclear warheads can barely make it through public appearances. 

In sum, backfiring EU sanctions on Russia will be the reason for Europe and Ukraine – not Russia — to abandon the shooting battlefield thus ´ending the shooting war´ soon even if the US would still want to continue. Then, plan B would kick in immediately against Europe as soon as the battlefield war stops in Ukraine. So, thanks to their own EU sanctions, by not having enough Russian oil, fuels, nat-gas, food produce, etc., etc., with social unrest and millions freezing and starving to death, regular public-opinion Europeans would demand the EU to stop battlefield support for the provoked Ukraine war and have their leadership cancel sanctions on Russia, and embracing it as the reliable trading partner as it has always been and thus returning to “normal.

Plan B Kicks In

Now Russia is winning on all fronts, be it militarily, geo-politically, strategically, financially, economics or logistics. So in the event that plan A failed – as it is now obviously happening – Anglo-Saxon plan B would soon kick in with Europe and Ukraine the victims, not the victimizers because neither will be able to withstand the tremendous burden that their ´Russian sanctions´ bear upon themselves, not Russia. And who would the victimizers be? Answer: the US + UK. Please re-read the “useful European idiots “paragraph above with very clear statements made by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. So the ´Russian sanctions´ will continue to (1) harm Europe and the Ukraine and (2) leave the Russian Federation basically unscathed and just collecting ever larger revenues – due to higher induced prices — for smaller volumes of exports delivered. This benefits Russia in two ways (a) getting paid more by producing less while saving the difference for future sales (b) it allows to finance Russia´s attrition-war strategy forever. There will be violence and massive migrations in Europe for sure as EU leaders are finally realizing.

It is becoming ever clearer for European public opinion that without Russian energy, Russian food, and Russian produce at large, Europe, quite simply cannot survive. So the end is now near and Anglo-Saxon+EU joint plans for Russian piracy – plan A — are just about over. Never in their history have Europeans depended so much strictly from Russian produce that very simply cannot stop coming in. All the way to very distant Japan and South Korea, with these Russian sanctions their much-required ´Just-In-Time´ strategy is rapidly becoming history. So now Europeans and Western controlled Asian states (Japan and South Korea) would freeze and starve with massive migrations democratically spread out everywhere. That´s why plan B “let´s loot Europe instead” will kick in soon.

What Anglo-Saxons may do after looting Europe and making it their own is to make an energy/ produce/ resources supply deal with whomever. They just take hold of installed and already built capacity plus expertise and human resources capabilities in Europe. Additionally, they would get the continental internal market in a key and unequaled geopolitical area of the world. The Anglo-Saxons basically just want to change the tide and win at something-anything, so if Russia cannot be defeated they´ll loot   Europe first and try to make buddies with whomever later, South America, the Middle East or Africa with investments profits on top. And Australia, as an active part of the AUKUS core may also perform a key role regarding “unfriendly” Asians.

This unexpected self-inflicted slow-motion demolition of sorts was not what Europe neither had in mind for itself nor understood to be the price they´ll have to pay for fighting – let alone winning — this NATO provoked Ukraine war.

So the real imperial aim is to split the already shattering EU into mini-union pieces, all of them quite fragile and evidently more “manageable”, as Brussels Eurocrats, blinded by boundless mediocrity, obviously can’t see it coming. And the Empire business is to exercise raw power – then maintained with ruthlessness by all means necessary.

So what about the US/NATO/EU in all this?

The Anglo-Zionist Empire died on January 8th, 2020 when it allowed Iran to bomb CENTCOM bases without even a single bullet being fired back. That day the Empire showed the world that it did not even have what it takes to attack Iran. As for the USA, they died on January 6th, 2021, in the Capitol Hill riots.

While the Empire as we knew it and the USA as we knew it did die, that does not mean that its composing parts all vanished in thin air. Countries and Empires have momentum, just like the Titanic, when they have been mortally wounded. Simply put the final process of sinking takes time. Second, there are two totally different planes in which the USA decided to fight Russia:

First, it declared total proxy war on Russia, but only total short of a direct war military confrontation with Russia.

Second, a total #cancelRussia in the PR/propaganda virtual reality. These infantile actions show how frustrated and powerless the West really is.

 Since 2001, Russia and the Empire were locked into an existential war from which only one side would walk away. This total war was about 80% informational, 15% economic and only 5% kinetic. After a very strong success in the first 2-3 months of the SMO, the informational war initially won by the West is now fizzling out. The economic war massively grew, as did the kinetic one (albeit still by proxy).  Currently, it is now roughly 10% informational, 50% economic and maybe 40% kinetic.

Economic: while some sectors in Russia did suffer from the so-called “sanctions” (they are not sanctions, but acts of war and crude robbery, all in all, Russia did great, and seems to be set on a path for economic success due to the fact that a) most countries have refused to obey Washington’s demands and b) the Russian economy is powerful and real, not virtual like the western economies. It will take a couple of years for Russia to adapt, but now that this process has begun, it is unstoppable.

Propaganda: here the image is pretty clear: on one hand we have the USA and its colonies, then a few countries with comprador elites that are hated by most people, and countries that openly defy Washington. This is best expressed by this map from the Chinese foreign ministry:

Blue is the Collective West – or ZONE A:      Red is red – the Global South or ZONE B

Industrial Warfare

The US won WW2 due its huge industrial base, skilled labor, access to plenty of raw materials and the intellectual and technical knowledge it possessed.

From the 1980s, the US, first, then followed by Britain and then the rest of the West, began to implement a new economic policy, based on the policy guidelines issued by John D Rockefeller 3rd (David’s eldest brother). This was the policy of “Controlled Disintegration” of western industrial economies.  Focus was shifted to the FIRE, Tech and the service economy. Now, 40 years later, there is not much of an industrial base left in the US, and the UK. Thus, why educate students if you have no need of a vibrant industrial and manufacturing economy.  Over 3 decades later, the results are all too plain for everyone to see. Offshoring manufacturing, diverting students to learn nonsense subjects has resulted in the US lagging technologically. The result in the military domain is inferior equipment and leading military technology. And this is reflected across the board, from aviation to ships to submarines, helicopters, etc. In the past 6 months, the US had 4 failed tests on its prototype hypersonic missiles. Russia and China are light years ahead.

Now, contrast that with the Russian military industrial complex. Mainly state-owned and run, top of the range- and very technologically advanced weapons, and the best part is that all of this is produced at roughly 10% of a comparable system in the US. Which other nation today can sustain the expenditure of nearly 50,000 artillery shells A DAY. Note that one can multiply this by 30, and then by at least 5 months. The answer is 1.5 million shells a month or 7.5 million shells since the start of the war. Besides this, we can also do a similar study for hypersonic missiles, plus a whole range of equipment and arms etc., used in the air, sea, under-sea, land, or space. NASA uses Russian rocket engines to send its ships to space. Since the sanctions on Russia, no more rocket engines. So, how is NASA or the Pentagon be able to launch space flights.

Russia is a resource powerhouse, as well as a heavy industry giant. Marry these two with military- industry-tech know- how, and you are unbeatable. The US, or Europe is nowhere near this.

To add insult to injury, Russia says that it hasn’t as yet touched its reserve ammo and equipment. And its factories are churning out even more war goods- non-stop 24/7.

London’s Role in the Ukraine War

After Brexit failed, the UK, more than ever, had to show that it could still be counted on as a “great power”, for example, that the collective West now needs “a global NATO” to pursue geopolitics anew. Or also “Europe must immediately cut itself completely off from Russian energy supplies oil, gas and coal”. Liz Truss is on record adding that China would face the same treatment as Russia if it doesn’t “play by the rules. The UK lost most of its colonies in the 20th century and economically lost further more with Brexit while the US outsourced most of its manufacturing base in the 21st. So with only their financial and military weapons left, both now are trying to make NATO global. In practice, a global NATO is already in the making. The British military has 80,000 soldiers- the equivalent of 3 months of losses suffered by the Ukrainian army. Equipment wise, all the European nations are way behind the US, Russia, Turkey, or even India.

When Putin stated that the mission is to “de-militarize and de-nazify Ukraine”, what we find is that, after 6 months of war, the EU and the UK have been de-militarised. Their weapons storage is nearly empty. Another 3 months of war, Europe will be lucky if they could lay their hands on even a small number of weapons. Even the mighty Pentagon and the military-industrial complex in the US have stated that they themselves are running out of ammunition, rockets and equipment.

Regarding the UK, and its hysterical lying media and politicians, there is a reason for this. The British Empire has all but vanished. The UK, as it stands now, is but a shelf of what is was-even 20 years ago.  It has de-industrialised to a great extent, such that most of its manufactured goods and food is imported. It has hollowed out its skilled labor force, opting instead to become a player in the FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) sector.

The leading financial power in the UK is the Rothschild family. This family has had it in for Russia since the 1880s. The hatred for Russia increased once Putin became the President- as Putin managed to exile, chase, and jail all of Jacob Rothschild’s “oligarchs”. For the past 2 decades, Putin’s nationalist policies have curtailed the dirty tricks and looting plans of the family in Russia. By doing this, Putin’s actions have stirred up hope of emancipation of economic, financial and spiritual slavery of the West, from many leaders in Zone B nations.  London has been at the forefront of support for the regime in Ukraine. When the war started in February, London was in the forefront of sanctions, asset seizures, travel bans, and the “cancel Russia” circus, in addition to supplying Kiev with money and arms.

The rabid hatred of the Rothschild family and its Anglo-Zionist bloc, in both the UK and the US has been the most vocal of anti-Russia and anti-Putin critics. And we now know the reason why. Besides losing large fortunes by either walking away from Russian investments and curtailing trade, the Rothschilds have found that Russia is becoming stronger-in all aspects.

Finally, London has noticed how so many of its vassal nations across the globe have refused to condemn Putin and Russia. Rather, the opposite has happened- as more nations are coming to realize that the West is actually a “paper tiger”, who can only resort to threats, blackmail, robbery and violence. The West has nothing to offer the Global South-or the Zone B nations- who are only too happy to witness the collapse of the West.

Putin has made it crystal clear that Ukraine is just a sideshow. The aim of Russia is to do away with the neo-liberal, unipolar world order, and change it to a multi-polar world order – excellent code words. Let me translate this into simple English. What Putin is saying that he is going to destroy the 2 empires that are currently ruling the world on their terms- and if it goes on like this, humanity will end up as slaves to these 2 empires and their neo-liberal world order. This statement of his instilled such fear into the heads of the 2 families that they realized that this is a fight to the end; there can be only one winner left. So, who will that be Putin, or the 2 families? And both families discussed this, and came to the conclusion that “I rather let the world burn than to lose my empire”. And, so, both have doubled down in their aim to destroy Putin, Russia and any nation that sides with Russia. This decision of theirs is not rational. And their refusal to change course could end up in the war going nuclear. Do note that the West doesn’t have the resources to win this war. By resources, I mean an industrialised base, raw materials, skilled labor, and most importantly, a patriotic nationalist citizen base.  Most citizens hate their governments with a passion, especially with the pandemic con, and its Great Reset agenda. With the onset of winter, living conditions in the West are turning into a nightmare. When the truth about the Ukraine war (it is coming out) becomes widespread, many will riot. Governments will fall. Political leaders will flee from their countries. It’s going to get ugly, very ugly.

 Weaponising Hunger 

In March 2022, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned of a “hurricane of hunger and a meltdown of the global food system” in the wake of the crisis in Ukraine.  Guterres said food, fuel and fertiliser prices were skyrocketing with supply chains being disrupted and added this is hitting the poorest the hardest and planting the seeds for political instability and unrest around the globe. There is currently sufficient food and no risk of global food supply shortages. We see an abundance of food but skyrocketing prices. The issue is not food shortage but speculation on food commodities and the manipulation of an inherently flawed global food system that serves the interests of corporate agribusiness traders and suppliers of inputs at the expense of people’s needs and genuine food security.

The war in Ukraine is a geopolitical trade and energy conflict. It is largely about the US engaging in a proxy war against Russia and Europe by attempting to separate Europe from Russia and imposing sanctions on Russia to harm Europe and make it further dependent on the US. The purpose of the sanctions is to prevent Europe and other allies from increasing their trade and investment with Russia and China. Neoliberal policies since the 1980s have hollowed out the US economy. With its productive base severely weakened, the only way for the US to maintain hegemony is to undermine China and Russia and weaken Europe.

Despite the ‘green agenda’ currently being pushed, the US still relies on fossil fuel-based energy to project its power abroad. Even as Russia and China move away from the dollar, the control and pricing of oil and gas (and resulting debt) in dollars remains key to US attempts to retain hegemony. The US knew beforehand how sanctions on Russia would play out. They would serve to divide the world into two blocks and fuel a new cold war with the US and Europe on one side with China and Russia being the two main countries on the other. US policy makers knew Europe would be devastated by higher energy and food prices and food importing countries in the Global South would suffer due to rising costs.

It is not the first time the US has engineered a major crisis to maintain global hegemony and a spike in key commodity prices that effectively trap countries into dependency and dollar debt. In 1973 – not long after coming off the gold standard – Henry Kissinger was integral to manipulating events in the Middle East (the Arab-Israeli war and the ‘energy crisis’). This served to continue global hegemony for the US, which had virtually bankrupted itself due to its war in Vietnam and had been threatened by the economic rise of Germany and Japan.

Kissinger helped secure huge OPEC oil price rises and thus sufficient profits for Anglo-American oil companies that had over-leveraged themselves in North Sea oil. He also cemented the petrodollar system with the Saudis and subsequently placed African nations, which had embarked on a path of (oil-based) industrialisation, on a treadmill of dependency and debt due to the spike in oil prices.

Today, the US is again waging a war on vast swathes of humanity, whose impoverishment is intended to ensure they remain dependent on the US and the financial institutions it uses to create dependency and indebtedness – the World Bank and IMF. Hundreds of millions will experience (are experiencing) poverty and hunger due to US policy. These people are regarded with contempt and collateral damage in the great geopolitical game.

Contrary to what many believe, the US has not miscalculated the outcome of the sanctions placed on Russia. Energy prices are increasing, benefiting US oil companies and US balance of payments as an energy exporter. Moreover, by sanctioning Russia, the aim is to curtail Russian exports (of wheat and gas used for fertiliser production) and for agricultural commodity prices to therefore increase. This too will also benefit the US as an agricultural exporter. This is how the US seeks to maintain dominance over other countries.

Current policies are designed to create a food and debt crisis for poorer nations especially. The US can use this debt crisis to force countries to continue privatising and selling off their public assets in order to service the debts to pay for the higher oil and food imports.

This imperialist strategy comes on the back of ‘COVID relief’ loans which have served a similar purpose. In 2021, an Oxfam review of IMF COVID-19 loans showed that 33 African countries were encouraged to pursue austerity policies. The world’s poorest countries are due to pay $43 billion in debt repayments in 2022, which could otherwise cover the costs of their food imports; 43 out of 55 African Union member states face public expenditure cuts totaling $183 billion over the next five years.

The closure of the world economy in March 2020 (‘lockdown’) served to trigger an unprecedented process of global indebtedness. Conditionalities mean national governments will have to capitulate to the demands of Western financial institutions. These debts are largely dollar-denominated, helping to strengthen the US dollar and US leverage over countries. The US is creating a new world order and needs to ensure much of the Global South remains in its orbit of influence rather than ending up in the Russian and especially Chinese camp and its belt road initiative for economic prosperity.

Post-COVID, this is what the war in Ukraine, sanctions on Russia and the engineered food and energy crisis are really about. The US has been able to dominate most of the Global South through agriculture and control of the food supply. The World Bank’s geopolitical lending strategy has transformed countries into food deficit areas by convincing them to grow cash crops – plantation export crops – not to feed themselves with their own food crops.

The oil sector and agribusiness have been joined at the hip as part of US geopolitical strategy.

Along with oil, the control of global agriculture has been a linchpin of US geopolitical strategy for many decades. The Green Revolution was exported courtesy of oil-rich interests and poorer nations adopted agri-capital’s chemical- and oil-dependent model of agriculture that required loans for inputs and related infrastructure development. It entailed trapping nations into a globalised food system that relies on export commodity mono-cropping to earn foreign exchange linked to sovereign dollar-denominated debt repayment and World Bank/IMF ‘structural adjustment’ directives. What we have seen has been the transformation of many countries from food self-sufficiency into food deficit areas.

And what we have also seen is countries being placed on commodity crop production treadmills. The need for foreign currency (US dollars) to buy oil and food entrenches the need to increase cash crop production for exports.

 ‘Food security’ has led to the dismantling of food sovereignty and food self-sufficiency for the sake of global market integration and corporate power. It is the same old industry lie that the world will starve without its products and requires more of them. The reality is that the world is facing hunger and rising food prices because of the system big agribusiness has instituted.

And it is the same old story – pushing out new technologies in search of a problem and then using crises as justification for their rollout while ignoring the underlying reasons for such crises.

The EU in a “Systemic Crisis “

“Washington and London have drawn ´useful European idiots´ into an economic war against Russia” – said former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev – adding that “the onset of a systemic crisis in the Eurozone is beginning to come true.” He added that Anglo-Saxons on both sides of the Atlantic conned EU members “like a couple of shell-game tricksters” by drawing them into an unwarranted economic war against Moscow which is actually an Anglo-Saxon project, not theirs. The US-UK cabal does not want Europe and Russia to trade, do business, relate, or grow together in any way, shape, or form. So they designed, built and forced upon Europe the current Ukraine war which had plan A (now failed) with Russia as target and plan B as substitute with Europe itself as the intended victim coming next.

This simplifies the problem from the Washington-London perspective as by controlling a handful of EU leaders the rest just follow like sheep. Furthermore, these EU-captured intellectual simpleton retards are not dumb enough to the extreme of questioning their unequivocal role (they are aware of it) and accordingly constantly strengthen their vested-interests relationship.

Then there is a second category of “useful European idiots” grouping the visible top EU leaders – many unelected.  Finally, the third group of “useful European idiots” is regular everyday Europeans that – so as not to abandon their zone of political and economic / financial comfort – knowingly allow their leaders to betray their best interests without getting their feet wet in any way. So the real imperial aim is to split the already shattering EU into mini-union pieces, all of them quite fragile and evidently more “manageable”, as Brussels Eurocrats, blinded by boundless mediocrity, obviously can’t see it coming.

The Elimination of Germany as an Economic Rival to the US

The First World War (1914-1918) aka the First Battle of Eurasia, was a contest between Germany and the US to decide who would inherit the position of the declining British Empire.  The Second Battle for Eurasia was called WW2 (1939-1945) – it was a continuation of this battle, with the US emerging victorious at the end of it. A defeated Germany was partitioned and   occupied by both Russia and the US. NATO was formed a few years later, whose sole aim was to “keep the Germans down, the Russians out, and the Americans in”. Germany became a vassal state.

It has always been a policy of the Rockefeller Empire and its main subsidiary, the US Govt, to make sure that Europe doesn’t become too strong. One can remember that during the Israeli-Arab war of 1973, the Arab oil exporters imposed an embargo on Europe. Although sneaky Britain (the most pro-Israel state in Europe) got an exemption, Germany and Europe suffered greatly.

Since then, there has been several attempts to link up German technology with Russian natural resources. This was viewed by the Rockefeller Empire as a threat. Take for example when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1990. This led to the unification of Germany- the eastern and western halves merged to form the original Germany. The business leadership saw an opportunity to tie up economic deals with a new, but broke Russia. This effort was spearheaded by Alfred Herrhausen, the head of Europe’s most powerful bank, Deutsche Bank. He had two major plans. The first was the reconstruction of East Germany into Europe’s most modern economic region within a decade. His second and more ambitious plan was to industrialize Russia with German industrial technology.

 On 28th November, days after the collapse of the Berlin Wall, and a week after the Herrhausen interview, Herrhausen was killed when his car was blown up. All fingers point to the Rockefeller Empire, and its dirty tricks division – the CIA. Herrhausen’s assassination was seen in Germany as a direct echo of the assassination of Walter Rathenau in 1922, (Here, British Intelligence was tasked by the London Rothschilds to do the deed) architect of the Rapallo plan to industrialize Russia with German technology.

An Italian professor with ties to Washington, Gianfranco Miglio told an Italian magazine in March 1990 that:  “The US saw that to avoid falling into a decline similar to that of the US, it had to keep pace with the potential adversaries of the future. They include Japan and Europe united around German economic power. The US could not accept the idea of Europe as it is today, a Continent that can not only manage quite happily without America, but one which is economically and technologically more powerful. For this reason, the Americans turned their attention on the Middle East, on gaining control of the Arab oil tap  on which Japan and Germany depend. “We all know what followed – the First Gulf War, with Iraq defeated in 1991. And this is how an economically expanding Europe must be countered using the Anglo-American oil weapon “.

 The US has to make sure that there can be no tie up between Germany and Russia- EVER. The geopolitical calculus hasn’t changed much in the past 100 years, regarding this point. As will be noted, one can see how this calculus played a major part in America pressuring Germany not to sign off on certifying the recently completed gas pipeline, Nord Stream 2.

 To make matters worse, from the American view, was that China and Germany were increasing bilateral rate at an astonishing rate. Washington was extremely envious, and realized that if Washington could not stop Germany becoming economically closer to Russia and China, then within a few short years, America’s influence over Europe would be over. It was at this point that Washington received a letter from the Kremlin, wanting solid, written security guarantees. And we all know what followed.

Now, what follows is my own take as to the plans of the Rockefeller Empire in regards to Europe, and Germany in particular.

Knowing this network very well (having studied it like a hawk for more than 4 decades), the game plan is as follows:

Militarise Ukraine, and use it to bait Russia into attacking Eastern Ukraine. Then, use this Russian attack to impose a financial and economic war on Russia. Squeeze the economy, which will result in the people turning against Putin, and “regime change” the Kremlin.( It did not quite work out that way)

Make sure that the entire EU is on board.  If the war is prolonged, the EU will bear the costs in economic and social fields. This will be the end of Europe Inc, and Germany Inc. Bingo, the Rockefeller Empire has eliminated its most serious economic and geopolitical rival in the world. Then, use Europe as a base to then move into the Middle East.

From the Rockefeller viewpoint of global geopolitics, they would have achieved multiple bonuses in this war. The first is that Russia would bleed economically and financially, while the same thing is happening to its principal economic rival- Europe. If Russia survives this, the EU wont, which will keep Europe more subjugated, Washington can use this to its advantage, especially when it comes to targeting/invading the Middle East. This was the plan. They felt confidant. In their minds, the US heartland was safe from enemy attacks, considering the US has 2 friendly, and controlled neighbors, as well as two oceans. No state has the capacity to harm continental USA.

There is one problem here. Russia has the capability to do immense damage to the US, in its very heartland, and the US has no military technology to defend against this. To make matters worse, Russia has secured its air space from enemy attacks, through its vast, multi-layered air defense systems. The Rockefeller Empire has come to this conclusion early on in the war.

So, both London and New York are feeling very cornered, desperate, and furious and are lashing out at Russia through the media narrative, spewing lies non-stop. They have to lie, for if the people realize the reality, things in the West will get even uglier for the ruling elites- that work for these 2 families.

An additional problem has arisen for the 2 families. The Global South, or Zone B nations have seen which way the wind is blowing, and they are siding with Russia. The failure of the West in this war is now resulting in most of these nations in Zone B breathing air for the first time in decades. This is the air of freedom. This is the topic of our next article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Posts by Month