The story continues from Part 2
5 The Rothschild’s Sabotage of a Ukraine Ceasefire
For Washington, the collapse of Europe is not a tragedy but a strategic goal, whose roots lie in the science of geopolitics itself. According to the fundamentals of Western geopolitics, Russian-European integration would be disastrous for the US-UK Atlantic axis. Therefore, in the face of Russia’s imminent military victory and Moscow’s rehabilitation as a Eurasian geopolitical power, the Americans have adopted a “scorched earth” strategy in Europe.Sanctions, the terrorist attack on Nord Stream, and the closure of the Ukrainian route to Europe are events that are part of the same strategic context: in all these cases, – American strategists want to provoke an energy collapse in Europe to enable deindustrialization and the subsequent economic and social crisis. The final goal is a ruined Europe, not only unwilling but also incapable of establishing any future strategic ties with Moscow.
With the fall of the Ukrainian gas route, it can be said that the US won an important battle in its economic war against Europe. The total collapse is merely a matter of time. To date, Ukraine has lost 1.5 million KIA, with maybe that same number wounded. This is besides the losses in military equipment and the destruction of critical infrastructure, such as energy facilities, and other military sites.
The US realized that they have lost the war. Now, the Empire wants to cut its losses and re-focus on China and the Middle East. The Rockefeller mandate to Trump is “end the Ukraine war fast!” The moment Trump took office; he arranged a 30-day cease fire with Russia. And this is where the problems began for Trump. This is how the Rockefeller family views the British. This, below, is from Zbigniew Brzezinski- a key Rockefeller advisor. He wrote a book on geopolitics called The Grand Chessboard, published in 1997. In The Grand Chessboard, which always speaks of U.S. “geopolitical” interests, Brzezinski dismisses as irrelevant the British. According to Brzezinski, Britain today occupies a special place as a U.S. ally, but it is a “retired” geostrategic player: “In contrast, Britain is not a geostrategic player. It has fewer major options. It entertains no ambitious vision of Europe’s future, and its relative decline has also reduced its capacity to play the traditional role of European balancer. Its ambivalence regarding European unification and its attachment to a waning special relationship with America, have made Great Britain increasingly irrelevant insofar as the major choices confronting Europe’s future are concerned. London has largely dealt itself out of the European game.”
“Great Britain, to be sure, still remains important to America. It continues to wield some degree of global influence through the Commonwealth, but it is neither a restless major power, nor is it motivated by an ambitious vision. It is America’s key supporter, a very loyal ally, a vital military base, and a close partner in critically important intelligence activities. Its friendship needs to be nourished, but its policies do not call for sustained attention. It is a retired geostrategic player, resting on its splendid laurels, largely disengaged from the great European adventure in which France and Germany are the principal actors.”
According to Brzezinski, Britain is above reproach in terms of the dangerously “geopolitical” doctrines that “Americans” like himself have been peddling increasingly of late, being content to maintain what it can of the “special relationship” with the United States and play with its Commonwealth–the euphemism for the British Empire today. What the Rothschild’s fear most about Russia being victorious is that Europe-especially Germany and Italy will begin to collaborate with Russia in terms of economic and industrial policies? This will make the Rothschild entities such as Britain and France irrelevant in Eurasia, and eventually the world. To avoid this outcome, they are prepared to sabotage any possible peace initiatives with Russia. They would prefer to pressure Russia with the aim of breaking it up/taking it over and bring it into the Rothschild system. In short, become a slave to the Rothschild Empire, as have so many other countries in the world. What makes the family even more desperate is that in many parts of the world, the family is losing access to its colonial holdings-especially in French Africa.
Since their military power has become a shadow of what it used to be, we find the family-especially the British branch resorting to terrorism against Russia, and other countries. A prime example of this was the British attempt to weaken Russia when it conducted its Kursk invasion in August of 2024. Russia has reclaimed all of its land back in the Kursk region. Since the beginning of hostilities in Kursk region, the AFU losses amounted to more than 70,000 troops, 370tanks, 237 infantry fighting vehicles, 183 armored personnel carriers, 1,622 armored fighting vehicles, 1,629 motor vehicles, 389 artillery guns, 44 MLRS launchers, including 13 of HIMARS and six of MLRS made by the USA, 16 anti-aircraft missile launchers, eight transport-loading vehicles, 100 EW stations, 14 counter-battery warfare radars, four air defense radars, 32 units of engineering and other materiel, including 13 counter obstacle vehicles, one UR-77 mine clearing vehicle, nine armored recovery vehicles, and one command post vehicle.
The Trump Moves
Two weeks later, On February 28, we just witnessed the most extraordinary unclothing in the history of American ‘diplomacy’. Zelensky’s life and career as a cheap television gigolo flashed before his eyes, as he stumped in the Oval Office today, while Trump and Vance took turns flagellating him like the mewling fraud that he is. The altercation occurred during a meeting on Friday where the leaders had intended to finalize a minerals agreement between the United States and Ukraine. The discussion deteriorated when Zelensky dug in his heels in and insisted that Trump should be supporting Kiev more rather than staying neutral in an attempt to mediate a deal with Moscow. Trump accused Zelensky of being ungrateful for American support and unwilling to make necessary concessions to end the conflict, while J.D. Vance criticized him for his lack of diplomacy. In an interview with Breitbart News on Saturday, Mike Waltz said that “the dealmaker-in-chief knows when to walk away from a bad deal or a bad negotiation,” and recounted how he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered Trump’s sentiments to Zelensky’s team.
“They were stunned. I don’t know how they thought that could move forward after that kind of very public episode with the entire world watching,” Waltz recalled. “It was really his team – and as you saw from his ambassador, she just put her head in her hands in the middle of the Oval Office – that knew the gravity of what had just happened.” Waltz added that the Ukrainian team was informed that “American patience had run out,” describing the sentiment as: “How do you come and insult someone when you’re practically begging them for money and assistance?” “So we made that clear in no uncertain terms. We made it clear that the negotiation, which could have been a fantastic day for them and the country was over, and that it was time to go,” Waltz said.
Essentially here’s what went down: A deal was done, as far as US officials were concerned, and then Zelenskyy asked for more after engaging in a spat with VP JD Vance. “Trump fully intended to sign the minerals deal today. Two official binders were prepared — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and his Ukrainian counterpart and the two presidents were going to sit at a conference table in the East Room and then trumpet their success at podiums.” After essentially being kicked out of the White House on Friday, Zelensky went to London where British Prime Minister Starmer immediately offered a warm embrace: ‘we stand with you’ – was the message after the major public clash with President Trump and Vice President Vance in the Oval Office. “You have full backing from the United Kingdom and we stand with you with Ukraine for as long as it may take,” Starmer.
A few select reactions…Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Medvedev posts on X ‘The insolent pig finally got a proper slap down in the Oval Office. And Trump is right: The Kiev regime is “gambling with WWIII,” adding “For the first time, Trump told the truth to the cocaine clown’s face.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio terminated US support for restoring Ukraine’s energy grid, which was funded by a USAID initiative that had invested hundreds of millions of dollars. The State Department this week terminated a U.S. Agency for International Development initiative that has invested hundreds of millions of dollars to help restore Ukraine’s energy grid from attacks by the Russian military, according to two USAID officials working on the agency’s Ukraine mission.
France are London & in Absolute Panic
Following the spat, EU nations, including France, Germany and Poland rushed to defend the Ukrainian leader and expressed their support for Kiev. It is difficult to say what specifically most triggered the catatonic European breakdown: Was it the fear of the U.S. and Russia joining together as a major power nexus – thus stripping Europe from ever again being able glide along on the back of American power, through the specious notion that any European state must have exceptional access to the Washington ‘ear’? Or was it the ending of the Ukraine/Zelensky cult which was so prized amongst the Euro-élite as the ‘glue’ around which a faux European unity and identity could be enforced? Both probably contributed to the fiasco. That the U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions would be a calamitous event for the Brussels technocracy. The Munich speeches did exactly that all right! Yet that does not make them accidental; but rather parts that fit into a bigger picture. It is clear now that the Trump blitzkrieg across the American Administrative State could not have been mounted unless carefully pre-planned and prepared over the last four years. Trump’s flurry of Presidential Executive Orders at the outset of his Presidency was not whimsical. How did the Democrats – and its owner-the Rothschild’s US Deep State branch- not see this coming? Lawyer Robert Barnes essentially that the ‘blitzkrieg’ was “exceptionally well-planned” and had been discussed in Trump circles since late 2020. The latter team had emerged from within a generational and cultural shift in the U.S. In short, they were not part of the WASP ‘Anglo’ world; they came from a different culture that harked back to the theme of America as Republic, not as Empire. This is what you see with Vance and Hegseth – a reversion to the Republican precept that the U.S. should not become involved in European wars. Ukraine is not America’s war.
The Rothschild Deep State, it seems, were not paying attention to what a posse of ‘populist’ outliers, tucked away from the rarefied Beltway talking shop, were up to: They (the outliers) were planning a concerted attack on the Federal expenditure spigot – identified as the weak spot about which a Constitutional challenge could be mounted that would derail – in its entirety – the expenditures of the Rothschild Deep State. It seems that one aspect to the surprise has been the Trump Team’s discipline: ‘no leaks’. And secondly, that those involved in the planning are not drawn from the preeminent Anglo-sphere, but rather from a strand of society that was offended by the Iraq war and which blames the ‘Anglo-sphere’ for ‘ruining’ America.
Trump views the ‘Brussels’ Technocratic State as nothing other than a pure offshoot to the American branch of the Rothschild Deep State – and therefore very likely to try to torpedo and sink Trump’s initiative to normalize relations with Moscow. If these were Vance’s instincts, he was right. Macron almost immediately summoned an ‘emergency meeting’ of ‘the war party’ in Paris to consider how to frustrate the American initiative. It failed however, descending reportedly into quarrelling and acrimony. A similar meeting in London also ended with no results. He meeting did however; underline Europe’s divisions and impotence. Europe has been sidelined and their self-esteem is badly bruised. The U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions, which would be calamitous for the Brussels autocracy. Europe ultimately will have to come to reconcile its future as a periphery in Eurasia.
Now, Zelenskyy will have no choice but to back down and accept Trump’s terms. Trump played both sides like a master chess player. In the end, Zelenskyy will have no choice but to concede, because without U.S. support, Ukraine cannot win a prolonged war against Russia. Don’t underestimate Donald Trump. In this game of chess, he’s 10 moves ahead of everyone.
Are Europe’s virtue-signaling (war-mongering) leaders unable to grasp completely that this is all part of Trump’s art of the deal to bring an end to the war.But all this smoke and mirrors failed to conceal that the ‘plan’ is entirely contingent on reaching a ceasefire with Russia first. In the last report we explained that Russia has now unequivocally stated no such ceasefires along the current contact line will be entertained—so what exactly are these empty suits chin-wagging about? That’s where we get to the heart of the newly refashioned plan: You see, they want to first create a fast ‘temporary truce’ to save Ukraine, and quickly pump it up with arms under the guise of escalating ‘peace talks’. During this brief truce they intend to wedge their armed forces onto the ‘DMZ’ to change the calculus of the war. But the trick is cheaper than a dollar-store shower curtain and has no chance of achieving anything beyond a short chortle from the man now in the driver’s seat—Putin. But the crux of the entire thing lies in the fine-print of Starmer’s above statement—watch it carefully again: he states that the only way British-French ‘peace keeper’ troops can be brought on the ground is if they are back-stopped by US power. In short: Europe is too terrified to go it alone and will not deploy troops unless it has American guarantees about backing them up should Russia turn their peace keepers into toasted compost. The US has already rejected such possibilities numerous times, so Starmer and Macron’s charade is just more empty static.
The Europeans (and Canada) are now talking loudly of a new muscular antithesis, independent of the U.S. Promises, promises—given that would require Europeans to prune back their social welfare state, frack, use nuclear, stop the green obsessions, and spend 3-5 percent of their GDP on defense. The U.S. does not just pay 16 percent of NATO’s budget but also puts up with asymmetrical tariffs that result in a European Union trade surplus of $160 billion. , plays the world cop patrolling sea-lanes and deterring terrorists and rogues states that otherwise might interrupt Europe’s commercial networks abroad, as well as de facto including Europe under a nuclear umbrella of 6,500 nukes. March 2025 is not March 2022. , after the heroic saving of Kyiv—but three years and 1.5 million dead and wounded later. Zelenskyy is no longer the international heartthrob with the glamorous entourage. He has postponed elections, outlawed opposition media and parties, suspended habeas corpus and walked out of negotiations when he had an even hand in 2022 and apparently even now when he does not in spring. 2025.
Meanwhile, NYT reports that the flow of US weapons to Ukraine has been nearly halted: But the carousel goes round and round, with the same old tired European gimmicks that have worn out the ears of weary EU citizens: more defense spending, more unity, more war, war, war, as citizens’ freeze, starve, and get abused by migrants. The propaganda’s diminishing returns have hit full tilt, and the only reason these cretins are holding on to power is due to them still having control over the fraudulent electoral system, demonstrated so clearly in Romania, where Georgescu was just arrested days ago.
In the meantime, there are some indications that Trump continues to plow ahead with a restoration of Russian ties. A new Russian ambassador to the US has reportedly been chosen, with normalization of ties and diplomatic missions being resolved: What kind of black hole rump “Ukraine” will turn out to be after the end of the war – which may not even happen in 2025 – remains to be seen. What’s certain is that in the case of a Ukraine exit – whatever the modalities – enter Romania. The whole electoral farce in Romania – complete with the demonization of election front-runner Calin Georgescu – revolves around the upgrading of the Mihail Kogalniceanu base, which will become the largest NATO military base in Europe. So, once again, this is all about the Black Sea. NATO wreaking havoc in the Black Sea carries way more savory prospects than NATO via the Baltic vassals monopolizing the Baltic Sea.
From an European – UE/NATO – angle, what really mattered in Ukraine was “to move its borders, along with its military, political and economic infrastructure, close to Russia’s, to put under full control the strategic Black Sea trade corridor – which easily stretches further north along the Odessa-Gdansk route – in order to more conveniently and quickly explore the economic spaces of Asia and North Africa, and to begin dictating its terms to Russian supplies of oil, gas and other resources needed by the European economy.”
The reason is simple. For Europe there’s no Plan B apart from that “strategic defeat” of Russia. The EU/NATO Black Sea power play would make it even more imperative for Russia to connect with Transnistria, Moldova. The only one who can answer whether this is part of the current planning is of course Putin. As it stands, Washington and Moscow remain divided by an abyss. The US and Britain simply cannot make serious concessions – or de facto recognize the strategic defeat of the Empire of Chaos. Because that would seal the Definitive End of Unilateral Hegemony. Putin for his part simply will not give away the hard-won victories on the battlefield. Russian public opinion expects nothing less. After all Russia holds all the cards leading to a possible negotiation. The EU/NATO will never admit their own, self-inflicted strategic defeat; hence those Baltic/Black Sea dreams, which carry the extra self-inflicted fantasy of disrupting China’s New Silk Roads as much as “isolating” Russia. Trust is far from being re-established, especially Vis-à-vis Lavrov-defined “non-agreement capable” Empire of Chaos with its global credibility in tatters.
Now cut to panic; total European panic. Other than the U.S., NATO simply has no military worth. And Washington under Trump simply will not be involved in the next European War. The U.S. has satellite systems for targeting but no one else in NATO has them. With the U.S. pulling out, and in the event of a hypothetical war, Russian missiles can knock out all European ports, airports and manufacturing and energy systems in a day max – instantly returning Europe to the Stone Age. This applies to England, France, and Germany, not to mention assorted vassals: all of NATO. Russia can knock out all British power systems with Zircons launched from a conventional submarine. Stone Age, here we come. Russian hypersonic missiles cannot be intercepted. Meanwhile, President Putin insists on talking sense to lunatics; on February 27, he noted how, “some Western elites are still determined to maintain instability in the world, and these forces will try to disrupt and compromise the dialogue [with the U.S.] that has begun. We see this. We need to take this into account and use all the possibilities of diplomacy and special services to disrupt such attempts.” Europe, with or without US backing does not have the industrial capacity, the financial might, and the military capability to stop the debacle. Russia has already stated that any European “peacekeeping” troops will immediately become legitimate targets.
The spectacular failure of Project Ukraine is a sight to behold. It’s no wonder the current political “elites” are in total panic. Without Project Ukraine, and without the Mafia protection of His Master’s Voice, they are just, geopolitically, an irrelevant, post-colonial small peninsula on the western borders of fast-integrating Eurasia. The SMO, meanwhile, will keep rolling’ on; and as the Europeans want it, to the last Ukrainian. Trump has torn a huge rip in the interface layer of the fantasy bubble … the governing élite [in the wake of Trump’s pivot] can see not just an electoral setback, but rather a literal catastrophe. A defeat in war, with [Europe] left largely defenseless; a de-industrializing economy; crumbling public services and infrastructure; large fiscal deficits; stagnating living standards; social and ethnic disharmony – and a powerful populist insurgency led by enemies just as grave as Trump and Putin in the struggle against vestiges of liberal times – and strategically sandwiched between two leaders that both despise and disdain them …”. “In other words, through the tear in the fantasy bubble, Europe’s elites see their own demise …”
Many in the Euro ruling-strata clearly are furious. Yet what can Britain or France actually do? It is the European economy, circling the drain – largely as a result of the war against Russia – that is dragging reality to the forefront. Given the close nexus between the U.S., the British and European Deep States, the question arises as to why there is such strong parallel resistance to Trump amongst European leaders also. The UK and its master-the Rothschild family – is seeking to undermine US President Donald Trump’s efforts to broker a peace resolution in the Ukraine conflict, according to the Russian Foreign Intelligence Agency (SVR). Trump has sought to repair relations with Moscow since taking office in January. High-level talks in Riyadh last month marked the superpowers’ first diplomatic engagement since Washington broke off contact in 2022, after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict. In a statement shared with RT on Monday by SVR’s press service, the agency said that British authorities view US-Russia talks as a threat to their strategy of “containing” Moscow by maintaining influence over Ukraine. London fears losing this leverage could disrupt plans to create an anti-Russia “cordon of buffer states” in Europe and impose a naval blockade on Russia, the agency stated. The SVR also said that British officials are frustrated with Trump for “engaging with Russia as a superpower while British authorities have prioritized efforts to sabotage US-led peace initiatives on Ukraine, the SVR claimed. It said UK media and NGOs had been tasked with portraying Trump negatively, describing him as a person “with a poor track record in peacekeeping, vulnerable to Kremlin manipulation.” More profoundly, however, Team Trump – committed to the task of taking down the Rothschild Deep State branch in the US as the ‘inexorable enemy’ – perceives (rightly) the British security state to be co-joined at the hip with their American counterparts, as a part of its global meta-structure. And its oldest and deepest component has always been the destruction of Russia, and its dismemberment. Russia will not deal with them. They view them as extremists (if not war criminals) who are in no way ‘agreement capable’ and must be replaced by a leadership who is actually capable of compromise. Russia would likely pursue and bring these men to trial. Zelensky has to be frightened at what the Banderites might do to him (despite his British team of bodyguards). So, Europe wants to shoulder the U.S. burden? Bloomberg that European bond markets are in meltdown. If Europe pretends to replace the U.S., it is going to be extremely expensive, very politically costly, and it will fail.
What’s Next?
Trump wants Ukraine settled, full stop. This is so that he can move ahead quickly – to normalize with Russia, and begin the ‘big picture’ project of setting a new World Order, one that will end wars and facilitate business ties. The point here – which Europe feigns to not understand – is that the end to the Ukraine conflict simply is Trump’s ‘gateway’ to the entire rationale and platform on which he stood: The Great Reset of the Geo-Political landscape. Ukraine, simply said, is the obstacle to Trump’s pursuit of his primordial objective: The Global Reset.
Starmer, Macron and the eastern wing of the Euro-élites are blind to the sheer scale of the global shift towards traditionalist U.S. politics and ethics. They miss too, the barely concealed fury in the Trump world that exists behind this nascent revolution. “The Maga Right has none of the inhibitions of its predecessors. It is planning to leverage the power of a recaptured state to annihilate its enemies”. The European Ruling Class is in desperate trouble and increasingly isolated, in a world shifting ‘Rightward’ at breakneck speed. “The U.S. is now the enemy of the West”, says the Rothschild-owned Financial Times and the Economist. The reality is that the U.S. is engaged now in rolling up Europe’s foreign policy. And, is about to start exporting U.S. traditional Republican values to roll up the European wokeist belief-system. The European Ruling strata – far removed from its base – have failed to grasp the threat to its own interests. The Trump administration is trying to rebuild the ailing Republic, and Americans in this new era do not care for the European obsession with ancient feuds and their entailing wars. America sees things differently: It views almost certainly the European Deep State to be putting a spoke into Trump’s ‘normalization with Russia’ wheel – a normalization to which they are viscerally opposed.
The European élites are deeply unstable ‘leaders’ who are risking the prosperity and stability of the continent. More than anything, it is the European economy circling the drain that is the reality at the gates. As it crashes, so does the base upon which Rothschild power stands. So, Europe – in the Rothschild orbit-is imploding-across every sector.
Why the United States Will Lose a War with Russia
The US has not engaged in a real war since Korea. No one in the US military has ANY experience with high-intensity conflict. If the United States launches a nuclear “decapitation” strike on Russia that kills President Putin and his Generals, Russia has a backup system in place that will automatically retaliate. The Dead Hand system is designed to collect data from sensors scattered across Russia on radiation, heat and seismic activity confirming a nuclear strike. If the system does not receive instructions from Moscow’s Command Center with a given period of time, the system will autonomously launch 4,000 tactical and strategic intercontinental ballistic missiles at the United States ensuring the complete destruction of the country and the incineration of hundreds of millions of Americans. Moscow’s message is simple: Even if a preemptive strike takes out our leaders, our ‘dead hand’ will still kill you all.
Most Americans continue to believe that the United States will prevail in a conventional war with Russia. But that is simply not the case. For starters, Russia’s state-of-the-art missile technology and missile defense systems are vastly superior to those produced by western weapons manufacturers. Secondly, Russia can field an army of more than 1 million battle-hardened combat troops who have experienced high-intensity warfare and are prepared to engage whatever enemy they may face in the future. Third, the United States no longer has the industrial capacity to match Russia’s impressive output of lethal weaponry, artillery shells, ammunition, and cutting-edge ballistic missiles. In short, Russian military capability far exceeds that of the US in the areas that really count: High-tech weaponry, military industrial capacity, and experienced manpower. The war in Ukraine has proven that the age of industrial warfare is still here. The massive consumption of equipment, vehicles and ammunition requires a large-scale industrial base for resupply – quantity still has a future.
The Capacity of the West’s Industrial Base
The winner in a prolonged war between two near-peer powers is still based on which side has the strongest industrial base. A country must either have the manufacturing capacity to build massive quantities of ammunition or have other manufacturing industries that can be rapidly converted to ammunition production. Unfortunately, the West no longer seems to have either…. In a recent war game involving US, UK and French forces, UK forces exhausted national stockpiles of critical ammunition after eight days.
Flawed Assumptions
The first key assumption about future of combat is that precision-guided weapons will reduce overall ammunition consumption by requiring only one round to destroy the target. The war in Ukraine is challenging this assumption….. The second crucial assumption is that industry can be turned on and off at will….. Unfortunately, this does not work for military purchases. There is only one customer in the US for artillery shells – the military. Once the orders drop off, the manufacturer must close production lines to cut costs to stay in business. Small businesses may close entirely. Generating new capacity is very challenging, especially as there is so little manufacturing capacity left to draw skilled workers from….. The supply chain issues are also problematic because subcomponents may be produced by a subcontractor who either goes out of business, with loss of orders or retools for other customers or who relies on parts from overseas, possibly from a hostile country.
Bottom line: The United States no longer has the industrial base or the requisite stockpiles to prevail in a prolonged war between two near-peer powers. Simply put, the US will not win an extended conventional war with Russia. The US effectively had monopolies on many decisive capabilities, like precision-guided munitions, night-vision, global strike, etc. The absence of high-intensity conflict between the US and other nations had a lot to do with these asymmetries. There was no need for the US to apply mass when it’s advanced capabilities—or even just the threat of them—were sufficient to achieve political aims….. The list of nations with advanced capabilities continues to grow. At the same time, Western militaries and defense industrial bases continue to erode. The West exchanged its large standing armies for a reliance on boutique American capabilities that were once decisive but are now increasingly commonplace. This has left the West without its technological edge and without its previous military mass. Those who still believe in US military supremacy fail to realize these changes. Worse still, most of them entertain cartoonish underrated notions about Russian military capabilities. They fail to realize Russia has both a technological edge and military mass. The reputation the US military had was deserved for a time, but everything changes. America’s adversaries—Russia, China, Iran—have either caught up to or surpassed the US in advanced missile technology, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), electronic warfare, cutting-edge missile defense systems etc.—which is gradually increasing parity between the states while ending the period of US military supremacy. The American century is rapidly drawing to a close.
The US could NOT establish air superiority against Russia — not in a week; not in a year. Never. It simply could not be done. It would be a logistical power projection challenge well beyond the current capabilities of the United States military. American air power would prove substantially inferior to the extremely potent and abundantly supplied air defenses fielded by the Russians. Just as the majority of HIMARS-launched GMLRS rockets, HARMS missiles, ATACMS missiles, and British Storm Shadow missiles are now being shot down in Ukraine, the vast majority of US long-range precision-guided missiles would be shot down, and the US would very rapidly deplete its limited inventory of these munitions in a futile attempt to overwhelm the Russian capacity to keep shooting back. American suppression of enemy air defenses would prove inadequate to the task of defeating extremely sophisticated, deeply layered, and highly mobile air defense radars and missiles….
The war in Ukraine has made perfectly clear that all manner of western air defense systems are inferior to even the decades-old Soviet S-300 and Buk systems that Ukraine originally deployed. And even if western systems were formidable, they simply don’t exist in anything approaching the numbers necessary to provide credible defense in broad scope and depth.
To complicate matters even further, scant US munitions inventory and insuperable production limitations would allow the US to prosecute an air war against Russia or China for only a few weeks at most. Moreover, in a high-intensity combat scenario in Eastern Europe, the China seas, or the Persian Gulf, the maintenance demands for US aircraft would overwhelm its proximate supply. Mission-capable rates would plummet even lower than their notoriously abysmal peacetime standards. The US would, quite literally after only a few days, see sub-10% mission-capable rates for the F-22 and F-35, and sub-25% rates for almost every other platform in the inventory. It would be a huge embarrassment for the Pentagon … but hardly a huge surprise. Simply put, US air power as a theater-wide undertaking could not be sustained in the context of a non-permissive regional and global battlefield against one or more peer adversaries. In Eastern Europe, Russia would savage NATO bases and supply routes. The Baltic and Black seas would effectively become Russian lakes where NATO shipping could not venture….
Many are convinced these are unfounded hysterical assertions. In my view, the simple military, mathematical, and geographic realities of the situation dictate these conclusions, and those who resist them are typically blinded by the myth of American arrogance and its attendant ills to such a degree that they are unable to discern things as they really are. If the US chooses to make direct war against Russia, China, or Iran, it will result in a war against all three simultaneously. And that, amazingly enough, is just one of multiple hard truths that the Rockefeller network of power and those acquiescing to its delusional designs, ought to give more serious consideration as they continue staggering towards the abyss of a war they could never win. Weighing Russia’s impressive air defense capability against America’s “scant munitions inventory and insuperable production limitations”, the combination of which suggests that a US military offensive would likely peter-out before inflicting serious damage on the enemy. Once again, the United States will not win in a direct confrontation with Russia.
On July 29th 2024, RAND Corporation published a landmark appraisal of the state of the Pentagon’s 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS), and current US military readiness… Its findings are stark, an unrelentingly bleak analysis of every aspect of the Empire’s bloated, decaying global war machine. In brief, the US is “not prepared” in any meaningful way for serious “competition” with its major adversaries – and vulnerable or even significantly outmatched in every sphere of warfare…. the Empire’s worldwide dominance, are judged to be at best woefully inadequate, at worst outright delusional. From the Rand Report: “We believe the magnitude of the threats the US faces is understated and significantly worse…In many ways, China is outpacing the US…in defense production and growth in force size and, increasingly, in force capability and is almost certain to continue to Beijing] has largely negated the US military advantage in the Western Pacific through two decades of focused military investment. Without significant change by the US, the balance of power will continue to shift in China’s favor.” “At minimum, the US should assume that if it enters a direct conflict involving Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea, that country will benefit from economic and military aid from the others…This new alignment of nations opposed to US interests creates a real risk, if not likelihood, that conflict anywhere could become a multi-theater or global war…As US adversaries are cooperating more closely together than before, the US and its allies must be prepared to confront an axis of multiple adversaries.” The RAND Commission found Washington’s “defense industrial base” is completely “unable to meet the equipment, technology, and munitions needs” of the US, let alone its allies. “A protracted conflict, especially in multiple theaters, would require much greater capacity to produce, maintain, and replenish weapons and munitions” than is currently in place…. For decades, the US military “employed cutting-edge technology to its decisive advantage for decades.” This “assumption of uncontested technological superiority” on the Empire’s part meant Washington had “the luxury to build exquisite capabilities, with long acquisition cycles and little tolerance for failure or risk.” Those days are long over though, with China and Russia “incorporating technology at accelerating speed”….. America’s “defense industrial base” is today crumbling, riddled with a myriad of deleterious issues. To address these problems, the Commission calls to reindustrialise the US after years of outsourcing, offshoring and neglect. No timeframe is provided, although it would likely take decades.
We have entered a strange, late-stage Empire era, comparable to the Soviet Union’s Glasnost, in which elements of the US imperial brain trust can see with blinding clarity Washington’s entire hegemonic global project is stumbling rapidly and irreversibly towards extinction. And even though, both France and the UK threaten to deploy combat troops to Ukraine thinking the inexorable trajectory of the war can somehow be reversed. It’s madness. Five centuries of primacy have produced a cadre of western elites so drunk with hubris that they are incapable of seeing what is painfully obvious to everyone else, that the imperial model of western exploitation (the ‘rules-based order’) is collapsing and that new centers of power are rapidly emerging. It appears now that these same elites are prepared to drag the world into a catastrophic Third World War to preserve their grip on power and to prevent other nations from achieving the independence and prosperity they’ve earned. Fortunately, Washington will fail in this effort just as it has failed in all its other interventions dating back to 1945. Because the United States no longer has the technology, manpower or industrial capacity needed to win a war with Russia. Just to reinforce the above points, the British/US combo engineered a false flag operation in Indian-occupied Kashmir, for which Pakistan was blamed. A few days later, India launched an air attack on Pakistan. Within a very short time, India lost 5 French-made Rafael fighter jets plus 3 other Russian jets – to Chinese fighter jets. The Indian Air Force had been assembling nearly 180 aircraft for days, concentrated near Pakistan’s borders. The goal was clear: break Pakistani defenses and restore the image of strategic superiority. But the skies were no longer the same. Using Chinese metacentric warfare, India was defeated. It’s a whole new ballgame.
More on this in our article called “Wall Street vs BRICS.”
Excellent article in regards to Romanian elections the results cannot stand because the fraud is totally visible to the Trump administration. The cheating by not allowing the candidate Georgescu to run due to pretexts is totally the work of european union. At this point european union leaders are desperate to maintain their power. I think the euro will be the toilet paper for all Europeans to wipe their asses with followed by the dollar. Capitalism is a very chronic ill patient.