The story continues from Part 1
3 The British Empire and the Origins of the Cold War, 1944-49
The current U.S./NATO/British imperial offensive against Russia, exemplified by the coup carried out against the nation of Ukraine by the Western powers, in collaboration with avowed Nazis, has its roots in the British orchestration of the Cold War. The danger of a British-instigated thermonuclear World War III erupting over Ukraine, or any of a number of other flashpoints, makes it urgent that the fraud of U.S.-British alliance against Russia, China, and the rest of Eurasia be exposed, and stopped. In fact, the United States and Russia have historically been allies, beginning with Russia’s support of the American Revolution against the British Empire, and continuing throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, most recently with the U.S.-Soviet alliance that defeated Hitler in World War II. The British Empire desperately sought allies after its Nazi puppet, Adolf Hitler, turned on it and attacked Britain and France at the outset of the war. However, once it was clear, no later than mid-1943, that the Allied effort would defeat the Nazi armies, the British began a massive redeployment of its intelligence and propaganda capabilities to target the Soviet Union. Their aim was to rupture the U.S.-Russia alliance, and recruit the United States as a military and political collaborator in an immediate post-war attack on the Soviet Union, including the use of the new atomic bomb.
By exposing the British role in initiating the Cold War, and the hot wars of the post-World War II period, we intend to free the world from the current replay of the Cold War, which is leading rapidly to World War III. Our aim is to stop the drive for world war and crush the British imperial gambit once and for all. We are doing this to EDUCATE, INFORM and WARN. There never was a Cold War per se; there was merely a continuation of the ongoing war of the British Empire against Russia, the United States, and much of civilization. As World War II was coming to a close, the British knew they had little time to act. Following the war, the British Empire would be bankrupt and spread thin around the globe. The United States would emerge as a dominant industrial and political juggernaut. The Soviet Union would be badly damaged industrially, and would lose a large portion of its manpower, but had vast resources and a strong (even if detestable) government to drive a recovery. They would present a formidable enemy. It would be better to conquer them immediately at war’s end, rather than wait for them to recover. But, to do this, the British had to incorporate the United States directly into the British Empire. It would necessarily follow that the U.S. could be mobilized for war against the Soviet Union. This was the task: to transform the United States into a satrap of the British Empire. At war’s end, the United States was a staunch ally of the Soviet Union, and was collaborating with the Soviets to plan out the new United Nations. Leading U.S. policymakers were demanding the dismantling of the colonial empires of Britain, France, the Netherlands and others, as FDR had envisioned. Americans were praising Russia, and condemning the British. A Gallup poll after the war found 60% of Americans were anti-British!
Britain’s Secret War against the Soviet Union.
As the war raged across the battlefields of Europe and Asia, a political war was being fought out among the three wartime Allies, the United States, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union, as to the makeup of the postwar world. President Franklin Roosevelt, much of the U.S. military, and the majority of Americans saw the British Empire as their implacable enemy, and this animosity caused much consternation in the British camp. FDR made it clear to Churchill that that the war was not being fought to save the British Empire. In August 1941, at the Placentia Bay conference, FDR surprised Churchill by issuing the Atlantic Charter, guaranteeing all nations the right to self-determination. This reflected the powerful anti-imperialist sentiment in the United States, and was correctly seen by Churchill and his cabal as a direct attack on the British Empire. FDR also demanded that Britain dismantle its preferential trade system within the Commonwealth, whereby Great Britain received cheap raw materials and other supplies from its colonies in exchange for finished goods. Roosevelt’s non-stop attacks on the British Empire infuriated the Rothschild family and it’s British Deep State. During the war, President Franklin Roosevelt made no secret of his plans for the postwar: to dismantle the colonial empires of the British and other imperial powers; In 1942, Churchill declared, in response to a U.S. demand to dismantle the empire, that “he had not become the King’s First Minister in order to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire.” FDR and Churchill nearly came to blows, more than once, over the shape of the postwar world. At the Placentia Bay conference, August 1941, the President infuriated the Prime Minister by issuing the Atlantic Charter, guaranteeing all nations the right to self-determination.
At wars end, Britain was broke, and was negotiating a huge loan from the US. But, the Rockefellers wanted to remove British blockades to American goods into the various nations that made up the British Empire, along with various other colonies under British/French control. This economic crisis demanded that the British negotiate a new loan from the United States and resolve Article 7 of the Mutual Aid Agreement of 1942, wherein “Britain was required to dismember the Commonwealth preferential system of trade agreed at the Ottawa Conference of 1931. Remember the Orange/Red war plans of the US, as discussed in the previous articles. In the Summer of 1944, the head of the British Military Mission in Washington, Gen. F.H.N. Davidson, former Director of Military Intelligence, met with a senior advisor to President Roosevelt, and asked him “whether the United States could be counted on to march with Britain in the ‘next war’ with Russia.” The White House was appalled, and expressed its firm disapproval. Under FDR, the British had it backwards: The Russians were our ally and the British were the enemy.
The single biggest problem remained the Roosevelt-led United States. The British complemented their growing attacks on the Russians with deployments inside the United States to corrupt and destroy opposition to an Anglo-American anti-Soviet alliance. Churchill maintained a massive spy apparatus inside the United States.
Franklin Roosevelt’s Assassination
It was well known that FDR was very ill going into the 1944 Presidential race, and the person he chose as a running mate would be crucial. The man to beat, in the British view, was Henry A. Wallace, FDR’s Vice President in his third term. Wallace had a strong anti-imperialist program which he envisioned implementing after the war. When British spies within the United States found out just what Wallace was planning, they made it a top priority to ensure that FDR did not put him on the ticket. The malleable, pro-British Truman owed his place on the ticket to their efforts. Wallace with the help of the Rockefeller-dominated State Department had written a pamphlet called “Our Job in the Pacific.” It proposed American post-war economic assistance for the industrial development of Asia, a trade policy for the Asian countries, and the “emancipation of colonial subjects” in the British colonies of India, Burma, and Malaya, in the French colony of Indonesia, and the Dutch colonies in the East Indies.
MI6 got a copy of it and it went to Churchill, who “could hardly believe what he was reading.” Wallace recorded in his diary how the “the entire British secret service was shaking with indignation as well as the British Foreign Office.” The British came to regard Wallace as a menace and took action to ensure that Wallace would not appear on the ticket in the 1944 Presidential elections. To cut a long story short, the British used MICE (money, ideology coercion and extortion) to get Wallace removed and replaced by Truman-a British/Zionist pawn. FDR won a 3rd term starting in January 1945. In February 1945, Britain, the Soviet Union and the US met at Teheran. A division of the world was finalized between these three.
Immediately after the meeting Roosevelt or FDR travelled to Saudi Arabia to have a secret meeting with Saudi King Abdul Aziz. They met aboard a US warship – the USS Quincy- in the great Bitter lakes in the Red Sea. The date was 14 February, 1945. Amongst the many issues they discussed was the topic of Zionism and the Jews of Europe. FDR wanted Abdul Aziz to agree to allow them to settle down in Palestine, but the Saudi King replied that they should be settled either in Europe or America. FDR was confused, so Abdul Aziz proceeded to brief him thoroughly on the danger of Zionism and the Jews. After this, FDR promised the king that he would not move ahead on any of these before consulting with the king. Their 5-hour conversation was put on the official records. Several letters between them followed. FDR had promised the Saudi King that “he would do nothing to assist the Jews against the Arabs and would make no move hostile to the Arab people “, and he encouraged a plan which Abdul Aziz had been nursing, to send a mission to the West to explain the Arab viewpoint on Palestine. The President stated that he thought that this is a very good idea because he thought many people in America and England are misinformed and, speaking to congress on his return, FDR declared that “from King Abdul Aziz of Arabia. I learned more of the whole problem of the Moslems and more about the Jewish problem in 5 minutes than I could have learnt by the exchange of a dozen letters”.
Back in the country, the news that the King had secured for fellow Arabs in Palestine pledges from the American president of consultations and protection (from the British) was counted a solid success. And, on April 5th 1945, FDR formally renewed his promises to the Saudi King in a letter which went to some lengths to make clear that the undertakings were not personal, but were being issued deliberately ‘in my capacity as Chief of the Executive Branch of this Government.” One week later President Roosevelt was dead, and the new president-Truman-chose to disregard the commitments that his predecessor had given. Six months later, Abdul Aziz would have been surprised if he could have heard how casually Truman tore up the promises that FDR had given to the Saudi king. This was when Truman summoned the diplomats stationed in Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries to hear their report on the fear and anger being aroused in the Arab world by the favors the new president was showing to Zionist ambitions. But nothing he heard appeared to change his mind. Truman summed up his position with absolute candor, “I am sorry gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism. I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents.”
On the 12 of April, FDR was murdered by the British, with his death being attributed to a “heart attack”.
The Shift in British Policy
Franklin Roosevelt’s death was a watershed moment in the campaign to influence the foreign policy of the United States in the postwar period. However, it must be remembered that Britain is not a republic. In the British system, governments serve at the pleasure of the monarchy, and the Cabinet is vetted by the Crown. Despite token opposition, the anti-Soviet drive of the oligarchy would continue. A senior British official, Sargent stated in his report that the British would have to overcome the powerful anti-imperial impulse of the Americans, and the US desire to negotiate the shape of the new order directly with the Soviets through a strong United Nations organization. Sargent wrote that “in the minds of our big partners, especially in that of the United States, there is a feeling that Great Britain is now a secondary Power and can be treated as such, and that in the long run all will be well if they— the United States and the Soviet Union—as the two supreme World Powers of the future, understand one another. It is this misconception which it must be our policy to combat.” Sargent was optimistic that British cunning could outsmart the Americans; Sargent was planning for the conflict with Russia and the recruitment of the United States to do the dirty work. Sargent underscored the need to recruit the U.S. into the imperial camp. With the contempt and cynicism which came from years of diplomatic service to what had been one of the foremost powers in the world, Sargent proposed to counter any such tendency -of British inferiority -by imposing a British foreign policy on the Americans: ‘We must have a policy of our own and try to persuade the United States to make it their own. This ought not to be too difficult; the process of inducing the United States to support a British resistance to Russian penetration of Europe will be a tricky one. It has been this figure of speech, “the liberal idea,” meaning “democracy,” “freedom,” “free trade,” etc., that has been at the center of all brainwashing dogmas foisted on the United States ever since. This has been the mantra that has been used to convince Americans to defend the evil British Empire against Stalin, comparing the Soviet leader to Hitler in 1945, even before the war had ended.
During the summer of 1945, the empire faction was very obsessed with the U.S.-Soviet entente. In July, Lord Halifax, the British ambassador to Washington, sent a report that U.S. – Soviet ties were on the rise. He further said that Russia was in direct negotiations with the U.S., mediated by FDR ally Harry Hopkins (a Rockefeller agent), over the future of Poland, which the British assumed to be under their own control. At the same time, the Soviets were requesting military bases in Turkey and unfettered access to the eastern Mediterranean. This was a legitimate request aimed at ensuring that a repeat of German attacks on their southern flank would not occur again; the Soviets also wanted to engage in trade throughout the Africa-Middle East region. Since the reign of Catherine the Great, the Russians had sought access to the Mediterranean, and they decided that the loss of 27 million lives in the War was a reasonable price to pay.
The Rothschild’s and its Foreign Office were livid. They were concerned with preserving “The Empire,” and the center of the empire lay in the Middle East, the gateway to the oil fields, the guardian of the Suez Canal and Egypt, and the passage to India. It was also the entrée to Africa, the source of raw materials needed to revive the shattered British economy. The empire faction drew a line in the sand in the Middle East, and also in the Balkan Peninsula, which protected access to Southwest Asia. The British reacted to the Soviet initiative. The Foreign Office, as spokesman for the Empire, decided to confront the Soviet Union at every point, charging “Soviet expansionism,” while failing to mention their own.
Frank Roberts, a top British diplomat posted in Moscow, coordinated his work with George Kennan, Deputy Chief of the U.S. Mission in Moscow, and this collaboration led to Kennan issuing his famous “Long Telegram.” Sent to Washington on Feb. 22, 1946, the Long Telegram, a wild attack on the Soviets, led to the promulgation of the “Containment Doctrine” against Stalin. While not calling for military confrontation with the USSR, the Telegram was nevertheless used by those around Truman who wished to stoke the fires against Moscow. The fuse was lit to shift a working relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union into an increasingly adversarial contest.
Churchill’s Iron Curtain Speech
The story of the British drive to rupture the U.S.-Russia alliance, and recruit the United States as a collaborator in a post-war attack on the Soviet Union, takes a big step forward with Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech in March 1946. The propitious moment for the British to challenge America’s longstanding friendship with Russia, and its historical enmity toward the British, arrived on March 5, 1946, at Westminster College in Fulton, Mo. It was here that former Prime Minister Winston Churchill delivered his notorious “Iron Curtain” speech. Entitled “The Sinews of War,” the speech referred, for the first time, to an invisible wall between the West and the Soviet Union. Churchill attacked the Soviets as running a tyrannical police state bent on world domination. To combat this, he called for an alliance between the United States and the British Empire, “a fraternal organization of the English-speaking peoples. This means a special relationship between the British Commonwealth and Empire and United States.” He further proposed complete military integration, and suggested that the U.S.-British alliance was more important than their relationships to the United Nation. But the speech had its intended effect, sending a shock through the U.S. population. It launched the campaign to revive the anti-communist, jingoist agitations of the 1930s, and succeeded in raising the specter of an “evil Soviet empire” in the minds of a public which no longer had FDR to guide them in a nuanced and statesmanlike approach to the USSR. Stalin was outraged: The speech confirmed his worst fears, viz., that an Anglo-American alliance was being assembled against the Soviet Union, shattering the relatively peaceful hiatus of the past year. Immediately after Churchill’s bombshell, President Truman, who had accompanied Churchill to Fulton, deployed the U.S. battleship Missouri to the eastern Mediterranean, as a signal to the Soviets, who were asking for a military base in Libya, and access through the Dardanelles to the Mediterranean.
The key to fighting the Soviet Union will be through air power and long-range weapons. Tremendous emphasis was placed on holding the Middle East, the gateway to Africa and India; it contained the oil upon which the Empire depended, and it was the nearest location to the Soviet Union to be reached by the British Navy and Air Force. It was also the nearest location for U.S. or British conventional or nuclear attacks on southern Russia. Were the British to hold the Middle East, they could attack Soviet oil and energy supplies in the southern region; but if the Soviets grabbed the Middle East, then they in turn would be positioned to attack Imperial holdings in all contiguous regions. The key was London’s determination to bring about a U.S. alliance with the British Empire. Everything depended on the British “persuading” the United States embrace the Empire as its ally against the Russian bear. It should also be noted that throughout this period, the British had their agents inside the Soviet Union, manipulating it against the United States. The death of Franklin Roosevelt was a decisive moment in world history. America under FDR was anticolonial and anti-British, and with his death, the British utilized all their cunning to reverse that. During World War II, the British deployed an extensive spy network into the U.S. It was run by Col. William Stephenson, head of MI6’s British Security Coordination (BSC). BSC ran a propaganda campaign aimed at shifting U.S. allegiance toward the British. It planted stories, some true, others fiction, in newspapers and radio stations all over the country. It also deployed spies, such as Ian Fleming, who were sent into the U.S., to spy and to change public opinion. The British also had a stable of sympathetic policymakers in high places throughout the U.S. establishment. Ian Fleming was an agent of British Intelligence, first based in the Bahamas. He was the author of the James Bond books.
During the war, Roosevelt had his main right-hand man, Rockefeller agent Harry Hopkins to ride herd over this treacherous bunch of Wall Street scoundrels (all tied to London), and prevent them from sabotaging the war-time alliance with the Soviet Union. When the war ended, and FDR was laid to rest in Hyde Park, the whole pack of pro-British operatives revealed their true allegiances. Churchill’s March 1946 trip to the United States spurred the anglophile establishment into action. Following the speech in Fulton, Churchill made the rounds in Washington, meeting with leading anglophiles. The funny thing is that the Rockefeller family also desired a new division of the world between communism and capitalism. The reason for this was that the Soviet Union would be in control of large parts of Eurasia- Central Asia, Eastern Europe, Russia-as one bloc. This would enable the Rockefeller family to expand American power and influence over the parts of the world that was colonized by the Rothschild’s. Once this was taken over by the US, then it would go on to “sort out” the Soviet Union. Remember, the Rockefeller family motto – “competition is a sin!”. The family would allow this new global set-up as a means to eliminate Rothschild influence in various parts of the world-areas such as Africa, the Middle East and certain Asian countries. So, the Rockefeller family allowed the British to push for a US-British alliance against the Soviet Union.
Truman succeeded FDR as US President in 1944. He was re-elected in 1948, with a big help from the Rothschild’s. Through the application of blackmail and a rumored bribe of $2 million, Truman was in their pocket. Not only did he go along with the anti-Soviet plans of the British, but he was very quick to recognize Israel at its birth.
The Rockefeller Family & the Soviet Union
The family got involved in Russian affairs through oil. Baku was under Russian control, and it was the first oil region. Russian oil was in competition with Standard Oil. The family managed to buy the Baku oil from the Russians when they nationalized Baku from Shell’s ownership. Financial aid, economic aid and diplomatic help were provided to Moscow. During the 2nd World War, the US provided more than $200 BILLION (IN TODAYS VALUE) in aid to Moscow in its fight against Germany. This aid was made up of military and economic supplies .Do note that the family financed Hitler’s rise to power, on the condition he attacks the Rothschild countries of Western Europe. London also financed Hitler’s rise to power, with the aim of attacking Russia. When Germany did attack Russia in July 1941, the US worked fast to enter the war by “baiting” Japan through sanctions. Japan fell for the bait and attacked the US in December 1941. In the 1960s, various Rockefeller companies began a new wave of industrial investments in Russia. The Afghan war crippled the Soviet Union leading to its collapse in 1990. Over the next decade, the US took over the Russian state, and dollarized the Russian economy. It was only with the coming to power of Putin in 2000, that the tide began to change. By 2004, it became apparent that Russia was slipping away from their control. A decade later, the gloves were off, with the Ukrainian coup, in 2014. The rest we know. Now, it seems that the Rockefeller family is pursuing a new strategy, called the Great Global reset. The full story and more is told in the article called “The geopolitics of Russia “. Hopefully, this will be loaded sometime later this year.
4 Ukraine-the Ashkenazi’s 2nd Homeland
The current leadership of international Jewry is dominated by the Ashkenazi faction, while the original Jews are known as Sephardic faction. These Sephardic factions trace their bloodline to the Jews in Palestine. These are two very different bloodlines. We shall now explain this, in order to better understand the hatred that the Rothschild’s have for Russia and the Arabs.
When the Muslims conquered Spain in the 8th century, the Jews followed. The Jews who had entered Spain could trace their bloodline to the Middle East. They spoke Hebrew and were called the Sephardic Jews. The Christians reconquered Spain in 1492-1494, and expelled the Muslims and Jews. When they were expelled from Spain, many of the wealthy Jews moved into other parts of Western Europe, and the richest of them moved to Amsterdam. Holland at that time was a colony of Spain, until it gained independence a few years later. The dispersed Sephardim occupied prominent positions in the countries they went into. Although the Sephardim lived on peaceful terms with other Jews they rarely intermarried with them. In modern times the Sephardim have lost the authority which they had previously exercised over the Jews. Government relocated to Poland. The Jews believe in a higher authority, thus we have a government of the Jews. This government was formed, in 950 BC, by a heretical sect, mainly composed of members from the tribes of Levite and Judah.
We now move onto the next phase of our story wherein we unravel a great human mystery; namely how did a Jewish population of millions come into being in Poland and Eastern Europe, when no Jews had migrated there from the Middle East? Brace yourself for a pleasant surprise.
The Khazar Kingdom
Japheth was a son of the Prophet Noah. Japheth, in turn, had a son called Askhenaz, whose nephews are Ajooj and Majooj (of the Gog and Magog tribes). These Ashkenazi spoke a Jewish dialect called Yiddish. In the 1860s they numbered around 4 million, while the Sephardim numbered around 500,000.
When Islam began to spread its wings, it also moved northwards into the area between the Caspian and Black Seas. It is the present-day Caucasus regions of Chechnya, Dagestan, Armenia and Georgia. This area was known as Khazaria. It was ruled by a King, the Kagan, who had come under pressure from the Muslims in the south, and the Byzantine Empire based in Istanbul. Both were pushing the Khazarian king to convert to either Christianity or Islam.
To cut a long story short, in 740 AD, he converted to Judaism, and his people followed. This neutralized the pressure from the Muslims and the Christians. In this manner, a new Jewish people came into existence. For the next 2 centuries, Judaism had established itself firmly in the Khazar region. Religious books were brought in to teach these newly-converted Jews about the Law, and the Talmud. Soon, these Khazar Jews adopted the same type of behavior as their fellow Sephardic Jews.
They went on committing all types of excess behavior towards their neighbors, such as robbing, killing, rape, etc. repeatedly, its neighbors issued warnings to the Kagan to modify the behavior of his people, or else. Then, in 1020 AD, the Russians invaded Khazar, and defeated the Kagan, King Bulan.
From around 850 AD, a new group had entered the region. These were the Vikings from Scandinavia, Sweden and Norway. They used to sail in groups of ships, numbering between 100 and 300, on raiding parties and commercial trips. The Vikings carried on periodic raids on Ireland, England, France, Germany, the Mediterranean countries, Iceland and North America. Another raiding vector was through the use of two great rivers, the Volga and the Dom, as well as the Dnieper, to transport their raiding parties on ships. The Black and Caspian Seas were rich hunting grounds. In both areas – east and west- these raiding parties built bases and fortified them. To the people of the Caucasus, these were fearful people. Because they had large numbers of people rowing these ships, these Vikings were nicknamed by the Khazars as “the Rus”, or “the Rowers”. Over a period of two centuries, these Vikings adopted local customs, intermarried and settled down. Their descendants were called the “sons of the Rowers”, or “Russians”. It was these Russians who invaded, and defeated the Khazars. The Khazars retained their independence within narrower frontiers, and their Judaic faith, well into the 13th Century. Between 1020 and 1260, a general emigration westwards took place. Many of these Khazar Jews moved into Poland and Eastern Europe. When the Mongols invaded the region around 1260, the majority then moved west into Eastern Europe. Here then, we have the cradle of the numerically strongest and culturally dominant part of modern Jewry.
The Polish Period
The eastern European region, in which the Khazar Jews found a new home, had only begun to assume political importance. Around 962, several Slavonic tribes formed an alliance under the leadership of the strongest among them, the Polans, which became the nucleus of the Polish state. In 1386, the allied tribes elected a king to rule them, a Jew called Abraham Prokownik. The Poles rapidly expanded their frontiers, and since they were in dire need of immigrants, encouraged Jewish immigrants from Khazaria.
In Royal Charters issued in 1264 and 1334, Jews were granted the right to maintain their synagogues, schools and courts, to hold property, and engage in any trade and profession. By 1580, Jews were granted a parliament of their own, and were allowed to levy taxes on other Jews. It was into such a setting that the Talmudic government relocated itself from Spain, in 1496. From 1496 to 1772, the Talmudic government proceeded to indoctrinate the 1-2 million Khazar Jews in Poland. This Talmudic Government was called the Kahal. In effect, a Jewish state, Talmud-ruled, was recreated on Polish soil.
The move to Poland was of vital importance to the West. The natural instinct of Europe was always to expect the greatest danger to its survival from Asia. With this move, Europe was entering its greatest crisis. Then, in 1772, Poland was partitioned, and it was divided, with most of it coming under Russian rule. There was bad blood between the Khazar Jews, the Ashkenazi, and Russia, dating back to the Russian invasion of Khazaria, in 1020. The Talmudic government ceased operating in Poland, and went underground. It appeared in Frankfurt, Germany a few months later. Then, there was the infamous meeting of May 1773- the first meeting of the Talmudic council in the West. The Council changed its name to the Illuminati Council. At this meeting, the Protocols of Zion was introduced- a plan for the subjugation of mankind.
Clearly, the “center” continued, but from 1773, in secret. The reason for this may be deduced from the shape of later events. The century which followed was that of revolutionary conspiracy, Communism and Zionism, culminating in the open appearance of these two movements, in 1917 –one in Russia, and the other in London- , which have dominated the world this past 100 years. The Talmudic “center” was also the center of this conspiracy. Around this time, the founder of the Rothschild dynasty was emerging onto the scene. Within a few years, the founder was beginning to start his empire. The region in Eastern Europe that these Khazar Jews settled down corresponds with today’s eastern Poland and western Ukraine. From there, many also spread out to the other nearby regions, such as Romania, the Baltic States and Hungary. They refused to live in areas that were dominated by Russian speaking people. The reasons had to do with the enmity that the Khazars had with the “rowers” back in Khazaria. Jews have a habit of not forgetting any insults or harm done to them. Look at the map of Eastern Europe today. See that the Khazar Khanate is in present-day Ukraine. We see that the area east of the Dnieper River is a Russian-majority area, while the area west of the Dnieper River is the region which is the “second spiritual homeland”. Putin is NOT interested in the region to the west of the Dnieper. He is fed-up with these Zionists.
The story continues in Part 3.
