3 London & the “Gujarat Mafia “aka “India Inc.”
When the British occupied India, their aim was to replace Muslim leadership with Hindu leadership, both in politics and business. For a century, two families were built up to serve this aim. These were the Tata and Birla families. Tata went into industry, while Birla went into agriculture and commodities. Over the next 150 years, this was the set up. After 1992, London began building up other Indian families. These are known as the newly rich of India, some of whom are listed below. From Gandhi to Modi, most of India’s political elite have come from Gujarat. Modi became the Chief Minister or Governor of Gujarat. A fervent anti-Muslim, it did not take long for the 2002 riots to break out in his state in 2002. After these anti-Muslim riots, Modi became an even bigger friend to the Rothschild’s. From that moment on, all sorts of help flowed to Modi’s wealthy backers. It was a short step to Modi then becoming PM of India.
Gujarat’s gross state domestic product (GSDP) increased to US$310 billion. In fiscal year 2023-24 Gujarat became the third largest state economy in India. The economy of Gujarat, of a state in Western India, is the most industrialized in India, having the highest industrial output of any state in the union.
One of India’s most industrialized states, Gujarat maintains a variety of industries. Gujarat is ranked number one in the pharmaceutical business with a 33% share in drug manufacturing and 28% share in drug exports. Gujarat is India’s ‘Oil Capital’. Gujarat accounts for 54% of India’s onshore and 39% of o onshore production. It accounts for approximately 46% of India’s installed refining capacity and 60% of India’s total crude oil import facilities. Gujarat has the longest coastline in India 1,600 km, and its ports (both private and public) handle around 40% of India’s ocean cargo, due to its favorable location on the westernmost part of India and closeness to global shipping lanes. Gujarat also contributes around 20% share in India’s industrial production and merchandise exports. People from the Gujarat state of India have had the savvy and drive to find unheralded success. As the state of Gujarat accounts for about one-fifth of India’s coastline, perhaps it was inevitable that its peoples should be merchants and travelers. Unsurprisingly, given their success abroad, they have been at the forefront of India’s own recent economic surge, too. The three wealthiest Indian businesspeople — Mukesh Ambani, Dilip Shanghvi and Azim Premji — are Gujarati. With just 5 percent of India’s workforce, Gujarat produces 22 percent of the country’s exports. Reliance, one of India’s largest private conglomerates, is Gujarati-owned.
List of top Gujarati companies which is ruling the Indian market.
Dhirubhai Ambani – Reliance industries
Jamshedji Tata – Tata Steel, Tata Motors including Jaguar Land Rover,
Mohammed Premji – Wipro
Gautam Adani – Adani started his business career as a diamond merchant. and rest is the history
Karsanbhai Patel – the famous washing powder NIRMA
Ardeshir Godrej and Pirojsha Burjorji – Godrej
Mohanlal Chauhan – Parle Group
Amar Jain – Asian Paints.
Vadilal Gandhi – Vadilal Industries
Narandas Desai – Waghbakri tea
Commodities king Kumar Birla is the fourth generation head of the storied, $66 billion (revenue) Aditya Birla Group. More than half is generated outside India, where it has a presence in 40 countries. Birla, who is a chartered accountant and graduated from London Business School, inherited the family empire at age 28 when his father Aditya Birla died in 1995.This family were the first to go into London’s orbit-along with the Tata family. Out of 191 billionaire, 108 are Gujarati – more than half. And that’s no coincidence. Despite being just 5 % of India’s population, Guajarati’s contributes 8% of GDP. And the Father of nation GANDHI – he was not a millionaire but we love to see his face in banks account. And their many peoples who originated from Gujarat.
Many of these newly-rich families have shown gratitude by purchasing various houses and mansions in London from the family. Mittal paid some $130 million for a mansion in London, after the family gave him the nod and the loans to buy one of their steel companies in Europe-Arcellor Steel. This was the highest price ever paid for a house in London- at that time- 2008. And, no Mittal family members ever slept in that house. Now, it’s up for sale at $120 million. This is just 1 example. There is much, much more on such stories. In short, these Indian families have followed their master’s advice, and the bulk of their investments are off-shore India. Were these companies to direct most of their investments in India, the country’s GNP would be greater today, in addition to improve the physical economy of the country. These individuals are not nationalists, but internationalists tied to London.
Them we have Surat as the new diamond cutting center of the world. This industry provides nearly 2 m jobs for the economy. As we all know now, the diamond industry is under the firm control of the British Rothschild’s; whose key South African agent is the Oppenheimer family. The rise and rise of Belgium’sIndian diamond dynasties. Whereas a generation ago, the vast majority of them was Jewish, today, a significant majority are of Indian, and in particular, Gujarati origin. Indeed, while the orthodox Jewish presence in Antwerp is still highly visible, the numbers have dwindled over time, as a new generation of young and dynamic entrepreneurs from the Gujarat have displaced them. It has been unexpected, so what is the secret to their success? The answer is simple. The state of Gujarat has owed its economic success to Rothschild backing, finance and mentorship.
4 When Hindutva meets Zionism
Such a war can only profit those usual suspects bent on unleashing various degrees of Hybrid War and Divide and Rule across the Global South. Both India and Pakistan are permanent members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Their dispute could have been managed at the SCO table, with Russia, China, and Iran present to mediate and placate. Instead, Moscow and Tehran acted independently and bilaterally, both trying their own way to instill some sense in the belligerents as mediators. Their success is debatable.
India is also – in theory – a top BRICS member, one of the founders of the multipolar powerhouse. It boasts an excellent strategic relationship with Russia and a geo-economics relationship with the new BRICS+ Middle East power, Iran. To pit India against Pakistan is to pit New Delhi against Beijing, which fully supports Islamabad via the flagship New Silk Roads project, CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor). So the war can also be viewed as an attack on BRICS from the inside. It was so easy to have both India and Pakistan’s so-called “elites” fall into the trap. One just needs to manipulate cheap “national pride” emotions – and the usual suspects are masters of that domain.
The Big Picture gets even murkier when we see that New Delhi, always insecure because, unlike the Chinese, it has not buried its own “century of humiliation” vis a vis Anglo power, is still wobbling between deeper geo-economic integration with Russia – and China – while relying on defense and security from the Washington–Tel Aviv axis. Hindutva and Zionism meet in more ways than one. India uses Heron and Searcher Israeli drones to patrol its borders, as well as Spike anti-tank missiles. Israeli advisors have trained Indian Intel ops. Israeli cyber security firms help New Delhi track espionage threats and assorted “insurgencies.” Junaid S. Ahmad, the director of the Center for the Study of Islam and Decolonization (CSID) in Islamabad, takes it a step further. He directly points to “Gaza in the Himalayas” – with the Modi government embroiled in a “fantasy war” over Kashmir. With India importing vast swathes of war tech equipment, Ahmad argues, “Zionism and Hindutva do not merely share tactics – they share a cosmology: a belief that supremacy is sacred, and conquest is redemption,” with Muslims in Gaza branded as “Hamas sympathizers” finding the equivalent in Kashmiris branded as “terror-adjacent.” Ahmad correctly identifies Hindutva as a “supremacist theology,” with a Hindu state “purified of difference – be it Muslims, Christians, or Dalits.” How can that possibly be accepted by the BRICS ethos?
The 2025 India–Pakistan war may go down in history because of the notorious air battle and the Bollywood antics – a messy post-modernist interpolation of tech warfare, psychological operations, information warfare, and cognitive dissonance. It stood casually, for a few days, as a global reality show and entertainment spectacular rather than an actual war. And that’s worrying enough, because it masks deep troubles inside systemically troubled India.
What does the Bharat concept – the new official name for India – really entail? Bharat refers to Emperor Bharata, identified as the first conqueror of the whole Indian subcontinent. Very Israeli-style, a Bharata Empire mural has since 2023 been showcased in the Indian Parliament, directly incorporating territories that belong to Pakistan and Bangladesh. So what can be realistically interpreted as “terrorism” under a Bharat lens, really? All Kashmiris, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis may be categorized as such? The actual leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) parent organization, the Rashtrapati Bhagwat, insists that the “Bharata Empire” will inevitably come to fruition. In parallel, Indian media went into a frenzy promoting the independence of Baluchistan from Pakistan. Who wins out of all this strife? Certainly not Indians themselves. Certainly not BRICS. Only the usual Divide and Rule suspects.
5 China’s BRI project & The BRICS Dilemma to the Rockefeller Empire
Plans for a corridor stretching from the Chinese border to Pakistan’s deep-water ports date back to the 1950s and motivated the construction of the Karakorum Highway, connecting the 2 countries, beginning in 1959. Chinese interest in Pakistan’s deep-water harbor at Gwadar was rekindled in 2002, leading to construction at Gwadar port, which was completed in 2006. Expansion of then ceased due to political instability in Pakistan following the fall of General and the between the Pakistani state and Taliban militants.
In 2013, then Pakistan and China decided to further enhance mutual connectivity. A memorandum of understanding on cooperation for a long-term plan for the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor was signed. In November 2014, the Chinese government announced its intention to finance Chinese companies as part of its $45.6 billion energy and infrastructure projects in Pakistan as part of CPEC.
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) a 3,000 km Chinese infrastructure network project currently under construction in this sea-and-land-based corridor aims to secure and shorten the route for China’s energy imports from the Middle East and the avoiding the existing path through the Malacca Straits, whichcould be blockaded in case of war, thereby threatening China’s energy-dependent economy.Developing a deep-water port at Gwadar in Pakistan and establishing a robust road and rail network from this port to western China would serve as a shortcut, enhancing trade between Europe and China. In Pakistan, the project aims to address electricity shortages, develop infrastructure, and modernize transportation networks, while also transitioning the economy from an agriculture-based structure to an industrial one. CPEC is seen as the main plank of China’s BRI and as of early 2024, is the BRI’s most developed land corridor. CPEC’s potential impact on Pakistan has been compared to that of the Marshall Plan, undertaken by the US in Europe in the hope of reviving the European economy- shattered after 6 years of war.
Following the proposal by Chinese premier in 2013, once operational, the existing 12,000 km journey for oil transportation to China will be reduced to just 2,395 km. This is estimated to save China $2 billion per year. By 2022, Chinese investment in Pakistan had risen to $65 billion. China refers to this project as the revival of the CPEC which envisages rapidly upgrading Pakistan’s infrastructure and thereby strengthening its economy by constructing modern transportation networks, numerous energy projects, and the potential industries being set up in the CPEC special economic zones include food processing, cooking oil, ceramics, gems and jewelry, marble, minerals, agriculture machinery, iron and steel, motorbike assembling, electrical appliances, and automobiles.
In order to stop and or delay this project, the CIA was instructed to use a separatist group, a Baluchi faction, to initiate terrorist attacks. There have been many such instances over the past decade. Was this project to succeed, like a similar one in Myanmar, the leverage of the Rockefeller Empire on China decreases greatly. With failure on the terror front, the Rockefeller Empire decided to leverage British Intelligence (which has extensive assets in the subcontinent, to create a false flag operation that would lead to war between India and Pakistan. Which, then, leads us to the latest provocation in Kashmir. This option was always there, but why exercise this now? The answer lies in the tariff war between China and the US. Since Trump came into office, a tariff war against China was enacted, reaching a 145 % level. Now, this is where it becomes interesting. When China did not respond to Washington’s threats, it just made Washington angrier. So, Washington decided to send a message to China, that “if you refuse to talk, then we can destabilize your BRI project in Pakistan.” Remember, the Rockefeller Empire-like its counterparts in London – have become desperate as they see the global empire crumbling in front of their eyes. So, as the saying goes –“desperate times calls for desperate measures”. And, through London, they launched a “false flag “operation in Kashmir, designed to create such as scenario. But, like all their moves these two families have been playing on the global geopolitical chessboard for the past 5 years, this move, too, backfired on them. It has been one failure after another since 2020, starting with Covid. A key and final point is that India is a hesitant partner in BRICS. It may act as a Trojan Horse for the US and Britain. It sentiments lie more with the West than the East. But, Putin and China are trying to embed India into the BRICS model with the hope that the West will “lose” India to BRICS.
6 Recent Developments
Throughout 2024, violence continued in Kashmir in response to increasing efforts by New Delhi to consolidate territorial control. On April 22, 2025, tensions escalated after militants attacked Indian tourists in Kashmir, killing twenty-five Indian nationals and one Nepalese national. The incident marked the deadliest terrorist attack in Indian Territory since the 2008 Mumbai attacks. India blamed Pakistan for harboring the group responsible for the attack and arrested two Pakistani nationals as suspects. Pakistan any involvement, and its defense ministry labelled the attack was a “false flag operation.” Indian and Pakistani forces have fought across the LOC every day since the attack. The United States and China have called for de-escalation, with Beijing advocating for an independent investigation into the attack and its suspects. Islamabad and New Delhi have since traded military threats. On April 28, Pakistan’s defense ministry that an Indian military attack on Pakistani territory was “imminent” and that the Pakistan military was preparing reinforcements. The BJP political party and other political figures in New Delhi called the heads of the Indian Army, and asked the army to intervene and fight a ground war against Pakistan. They refused and walked out of the room, telling the politicians that “you guys are mad “. At around the same time, India sent its only aircraft carrier steaming towards Karachi, but was forced to turn back, due to some “unforeseen developments” that put their carrier at risk. In the wake of the attack, tit-for-tat measures by India and Pakistan have driven bilateral relations to their lowest point in recent years. New Delhi first to downgrade ties with Pakistan, suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, terminating a visa-free travel regime with Pakistan, and closing the Attari border crossing between the two countries. In turn, Pakistan responded to the suspension of the water treaty, warning that any attempts to alter Pakistan’s Indus River flows would be considered “an act of war.” Islamabad closed Pakistani airspace to all Indian commercial airlines, halted a special visa regime for Indian citizens, and suspended bilateral trade.
On 7 May 2025, the Indian Air Force (IAF) launched a series of 14 attacks, codenamed Operation Sindoor, targeting nine locations in Pakistan. The attack was over a 23-minute duration. A Pakistani general said that the strikes were conducted without Indian aircraft entering Pakistani airspace. In response to the attacks, Pakistani Prime Minister convened a meeting to coordinate retaliatory strikes. The NSC declared that Pakistan “reserves the right to respond, in self-defense, at a time, place, and manner of its choosing.” According to India, Pakistani cross-border shelling and small arms firing increased following the Indian attacks, including in the regions of and located in Indian-administered Kashmir. According to Pakistan, the Indian strikes hit civilian areas, including mosques. Following these strikes, there were border skirmishes and drone strikes between the two countries. This conflict marked the first drone battle between the two nuclear-armed nations.
In the early hours of 10 May, India accused Pakistan of launching missile attacks on Indian air bases .India retaliated with attacks on several Pakistan air bases. On 10 May, Pakistan launched its operation codenamed Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos, in which it said it had targeted several Indian military bases.
The Biggest Aerial Clash since World War II
In the biggest aerial dogfight since World War II, two nuclear-armed rivals test the boundaries of conflict and deterrence – with some jaw-dropping surprises in the mix. Pakistan deployed 42 jets, while India deployed 60 jets. India responded with strikes on Pakistani military airbases. Satellite pictures show damage to control centers, runways, radar installations, and hardened aircraft shelters – but no confirmed aircraft losses. Pakistan returned fire on Indian airbases and weapons depots. Islamabad destroyed India’s S-400 system. India has relied on Israeli Harop drones and BrahMos cruise missiles – supersonic, sea, and land-attack weapons derived from Russia’s Yakhont system. These are difficult to intercept and highly accurate. Pakistan, meanwhile, has fired short-range ballistic missiles like the Fattah (150 km range) and Hatf (70 km), as well as Turkish Bayraktar drones. India’s strategic posture remains designed to allow rapid, conventional strikes inside Pakistan without triggering nuclear retaliation. CSD envisions integrated battle groups launching attacks within 48–72 hours, hitting military – not civilian – targets. In response, Pakistan has deployed Nasr/Hatf tactical nukes to deter such incursions.
India’s initial strikes used French SCALP/Storm Shadow cruise missiles launched from Rafales, requiring those fighters to venture near Pakistani airspace. This implies their aircraft remained deep within friendly territory, potentially flying radar-silent or using mountainous terrain for cover. Pakistani AWACS may have fed targeting data to the fighters, allowing missiles to be launched without radar detection. In the final approach, the PL-15’s onboard radar would have taken over, guiding the missile independently. Notably, this time – unlike in previous confrontations – Pakistan to have come out on top against its conventionally superior adversary, “revealing the weaknesses of India’s air force.” Last week, Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, while addressing the National Assembly, “Our Air Force has made the nation proud,” noting that “the much-hyped Rafale jets failed miserably, and Indian pilots proved to be utterly incompetent.” After the four-day military conflict, both India and Pakistan announced that a ceasefire had been agreed after a hotline communication between their DGMOs (Directors General of Military Operations) on 10 May 2025. Vice President and Secretary of State held extensive correspondence with both Indian and Pakistani officials during the negotiations. The ceasefire has been holding with resumed commercial flights and normalcy reported from both countries.
On 15 May, Pakistani prime minister claimed that Pakistan shot down six fighter jets which included three Rafale fighter jets, one Sukhoi Su-30, one MiG-29, and one Mirage 2000. He claimed that Pakistani forces also shot down a total of 85 Indian drones, which included one Israeli-manufactured Heron UAV and 84 quad copters and surveillance drones that were being used for reconnaissance and possible targeting purposes and paralyzed 70 percent of India’s power grid; and smashed India’s made-in-Russia S-400 defense system. For all the alarming seriousness of two South Asian nuclear powers coming to the razor’s edge of a lethal exchange, the 2025 India–Pakistan war could not but contain elements of a Bollywood extravaganza. Then, after so much sound and fury, Pakistan on 10 May announced it had won the war. The predominant interpretation all across the globe does stand on solid facts. And those facts are profoundly game-changing: For the first time ever, Made-in-China weapons and equipment defeated similar-grade western weapons and hardware, not in a wargaming scenario, but in high-intensity air battle conditions. No amount of spin and glossy ads can compare with this practical demonstration by the Chinese military-industrial complex. A PAF/Chinese strategist attributes it to a triad: mastery of systems warfare – as in highly integrated and synchronized Chinese air combat systems, Pakistani pilot competence, and preparedness for war. What PAF did, he reasons, emulates what China has been doing: investing in 6th-generation fighters, DF-17 missiles, and quantum satellites.
Indian Missiles hit Pakistani Airbases as Explosions Rock Lahore
Multiple explosions were reported in Lahore, Peshawar, and Rawalpindi, while the exact facts and locations are still being investigated.
Explosions occurred in Pakistan’s Rawalpindi and Lahore on Friday night, with reports indicating a missile strike by India on the Nur Khan Airbase near Chaklala, as the tit-for-tat strikes between India and Pakistan continue to escalate. Two explosions were heard near the airbase, triggering an immediate reaction from local police and emergency personnel. Authorities have cordoned off the area, and security sources say the intended attack was prevented. Multiple explosions were reported in Lahore, while the exact facts and locations are still being investigated. Pakistan also reported five explosions in Peshawar. The Pakistani army reported that Pakistani air defenses intercepted most of the missiles fired by India, and missiles that were not intercepted failed to reach their targets.
India and Pakistan lock horns: Who won and why?
The world just witnesses a shockingly one-sided air war between Pakistan and India last week. Pakistan air force, equipped with Chinese weapon systems, took down a large number of India air combat assets while suffering zero loss. The air battle featured Chinese-made J-10C fighters, PL-15 air to air missiles, HQ-9 air defense system, and ZDK-03 AWACS. Reported India losses included 3 French-made Rafale fighters, 1 Russia-made Su-30, 1 MiG-29, and 1 Israel-made Heron UAV. What makes the outcome so shocking is that the Rafale fighter, sold to India at $240 million each, is often lauded as the most advanced European fighter jet, didn’t manage to put up any fight in the confrontation with J-10C. The Mica and Meteor air-to-air missiles carried by Rafale were discovered intact/unfired in the wreckage.
J-10C, by no means a backward fighter, is considered as well past its prime in the Chinese air force whose more advanced fighters include J-20, J-35 (both 5th generation stealth fighters), J-16, J-15 (4.5th generation multirole fighters), let alone the 6th generation fighters (J-36 and J-50) that are being tested.
J-10C is mainly for exports these days. Pakistan has acquired them at $40 million per unit. A few Middle Eastern nations are also considering the jet, including Egypt. Typically Chinese military export is one or one and a half generation behind what the PLA equips itself. In all fairness, Rafale would be a strong match against J-10C in a head-to-head dog fight. At $240 million, it is even for more expensive than F-35.
Then, how did the Indian air force suffer such a humiliating one-sided loss against a much smaller Pakistan air force? The answer lies in the strength of the integrated Chinese weapon system used by Pakistan. Rather than using a hodgepodge of weapons sourced from France, Russia, Israel, and the US, as is the case with India, Pakistan utilized a full suite of highly integrated and synchronized air combat systems from China that include – J-10C fighter jet – a 4th generation multirole lighter fighter with a KLJ-7A AESA radar whose detection range exceeds 300km. With gallium nitride technology, it can lock onto the Rafale’s RBE-2 gallium arsenide radar signature 60-100 km before the Rafale even detects it. In modern air war, which sees first fires first?
PL-15 air to air missile – one of the deadliest beyond visual range air to air missile with strike range over 200km. The PL-15E, the export version, still has a strike range of 150km, significantly longer than the 80km range of the Mica or the 100km range of Meteor, the most advanced European air to air missile. HQ-9 air defense system – this older generation Chinese air defense system (the newer one is HQ-19 with much longer range) has a maximum range of 200 km up to an altitude of 30km. While it has a significant shorter effective range than the Russian S-400 system (400km range), it enjoys a seamless data link with the J-10C fighter and PL-15E missile that automatically handles both fighter and missile guidance in combat.
ZDK-03 AWACs – again this is an older Chinese early warning plane, two generations from PLA air force most advanced systems (KJ-3000 and KJ-700). It is tailor-made for the Pakistan air force by China. The AWAC features an Active Electronically Scanned Arrange (AESA) radar with 360-degree coverage, capable of detecting and tracking up to 100 aerial targets, including low-flying and stealth jets. Importantly, ZDK-03 features an integrated sensor and communications suite, including Missile Approach Warning Systems (MAWS) and can maintain data links with ground command centers and friendly aircraft for real-time battlefield coordination.
With Link 17, a two-way communication data link China has helped Pakistan develop, the HQ-9 air defense system passes the Indian Rafale fighter information to the J-10C fighter which fires the PL-15E air to air missile well beyond the range of Rafale’s own missiles. Then the ZDK-03 AWAC maintains the data link with the missile and guides it toward the target. PLA’s internal data link systems, such as XS-3 and DTS-03, are far more sophisticated than Link 17 or Link 16, the NATO data link standard. They use a combination of Beidou satellite navigation/communication and AI-powered military-grade 5G system. Given their highly classified nature, the systems are under strict export ban.
The Rafales were shot down before they even had a chance to engage with the J-10Cs within the missile range. The defeat suffered by the India air force is a result of its lack of an integrated air warfare system. Standalone weaponry, however advanced, cannot achieve air superiority without the integration of other air warfare systems and seamless data links in today’s informationalized combat environment. Of course, poor training and tactical planning are also contributing factors. Pakistan, with its integrated Chinese-made air combat platforms, has achieved a decisive victory over India, whose patchwork collection of various weapon platforms prove both costly and ineffective. When $240 million Rafale fighters are brought down by $40 million J-10Cs with $180,000 PL-15E missiles, the military world is experiencing its own Deep Seek moment. China’s New Hypersonic Air-to-air Missile that China just fielded an ultra-long 1,000km hypersonic missile (which can cover that distance in 8 minutes at Mach 5, designed to neutralize the US F-22 and F-35 fighters and B-21 bomber.
The Pakistan India air combat, labelled as the largest air war in 50 years, is a testing ground for Chinese technologies. With military hardware one to two generations older than PLA’s own, Pakistan has handily beat Indian’s most advanced western weaponry. The US and the west would be making a deadly mistake to underestimate the Chinese military in Western Pacific and challenge China in a kinetic war. The cherry on top is that India, despite western media’s hype as a counterbalance to China, proves it is just noise and can barely serve as a speed bump. The story continues in Part 3.
