3. The Ukraine Project

After the Great Repo Crisis on Wall Street, in August-September 2019, the family initiated Covid and a lockdown of the global economy. The family always plans ahead, game-planning multiple scenarios. Time was running out to save their financial empire. They badly needed new sources of income. Russia was always in their mind, and greed and fear overcame them, which pushed them to build up Ukraine, and use it as a hammer against Russia. The aim was to break up Russia into several pieces, making it easier to control, and loot. However, this entire exercise backfired on the West. They have lost the Ukraine conflict. The state of panic reached its height in the West by September 2024.  For the past few months, we hear a lot of threats from UK, France and the US about using nukes on Russia, as Ukraine and NATO have lost the conflict in Ukraine.  Washington was prepared to station more nuclear weapons in Europe. Putin warned the EU leaders that they would be destroyed by Russian response.

In November, in retaliation against Ukrainian strikes on Russian soil, Russia launched a hit on a major arms factory in Western Ukraine. Instead of using a tactical nuke, Putin used the Oreshnik hypersonic missile. Its effects was shocking and deadly. The West had multiple cardiac events over this. After this, there were no more talks from the West about using nuclear weapons. The West has pumped in between $250 to $350 billion into Project Ukraine. All to no avail. The West is on the verge of becoming de-militarized. A senior Pentagon official revealed recently that if America had to enter a conventional war, its munitions would last for 2 weeks, after which they would have to use nukes. Even in London, the center of Russo phobic aggression, the media have at last started asking warmonger Starmer about the consequences of such virulent attacks and the danger of a Russian military response against Britain.

Unexpectedly however, a new weapon appeared on the scene which saved Putin from the ‘all-or-nothing’ choice of having to concede a bargaining ‘hand’ to Ukraine, or resort to nuclear deterrence. Instead, the war can be settled by facts on the ground. The Oreshnik missile (that was used to attack the Yuzhmash complex at Dnietropetrovsk) provides Russia with a weapon, such as never before witnessed: An intermediate range missile system that effectively checkmates the western nuclear threat. Graphic proof that NATO has absolutely no clue what hit them – and will hit them again – is the escalation dementia in effect even after Oreshnik’s warheads reduced a missile factory in Dnepropetrovsk to smithereens. And even after Moscow made it quite clear that they don’t need nuclear weapons to hit anything they want anywhere on Earth. Oreshnik – a kinetic weapons system – is a certified game-changer when it comes to military technology and warfare in more ways than one: actually several. Simple physics tells us that by combining enough kinetic force and mass, utter devastation is guaranteed, comparable to a low-to-medium yield nuclear weapon. With the added benefit of no radiation. With Oreshnik now entering the picture, everywhere the Hegemon will try to harass China they will also have to face Russia.

 The new game in town is Russia being capable of unleashing ultra-high-velocity kinetic weapons literally anywhere around the world – after warning civilians to abandon the area around the targets. And there’s absolutely no defense against it, anywhere. Nowhere to run, baby, nowhere to hide

To be concise: a system with the destructive power of a tactical nuclear weapon but carrying the precision of a top sniper’s bullet. Ergo, sitting duck billion-dollar aircraft carriers; the whole, 800-plus Empire of Bases; assorted underground bunkers; ICBM launch platforms; naval shipyards; not to mention NATO’s HQ in Brussels, the Aegis Ashore base in Poland, the NATO joint force center in the Netherlands, southern NATO command in Naples – all these immensely expensive assets are fair game for non-nuclear Oreshniks capable of reducing them to dust in a flash after flying for mere minutes at over Mach 10. After this, all we heard from the Western political class was complaints and squeals, because for all practical purposes it is Russia which is now ruling the escalation game.

Russia can now manage western escalation with a credible threat of retaliation that is both hugely destructive – yet conventional. It inverts the paradigm. It is now the West’s escalation that either has to go nuclear, or be limited to providing Ukraine with weapons such as ATACMS or Storm Shadow that will not alter the course of the war. Were NATO to escalate further, it risks an Oreshnik strike in retaliation, either in Ukraine or on some target in Europe, leaving the West with the dilemma of what to do next.

    Putin has warned: ‘If you strike again in Russia, we will respond with an Oreshnik hit on a military facility in another nation. We will provide warning, so that civilians can evacuate. There is nothing that you can do to prevent this; you do not have an anti-missile system that can stop an attack coming in at Mach 10’. The tables are turned.  London never allowed any of its vassals to conduct any diplomacy with Russia. With Trump back in the picture, diplomacy is back. London is furious, and is trying its best to sabotage any diplomacy with Moscow.

The US is reducing its role in Ukraine, and has passed the buck to the Rothschild’s Britain and France. This has induced panic within the Rothschild family and its political vassals. Try as they might to get America more involved in Ukraine, the Rothschild’s have increasingly resorted to terrorism- their default mode. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy’s recent visit to Kiev was an attempt to disrupt the nascent, potential peace negotiations with Russia on the settlement of the Ukraine conflict. This trip was “to prevent a peaceful settlement” and to “discredit” a US-backed push for a ceasefire being led by Trump’s envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg. Britain’s foreign secretary visited Kiev recently and announced a further 55 million pounds in financial aid. Last month, PM Starmer announced a £4.5 billion package which includes the procurement of hundreds of air defense systems and drones; even though the UK has run out of cash.  Last Friday, Trump said that communication is ongoing between his administration and the Russian government and reiterated his goal of putting a swift end to nearly three years of hostilities. This has put the Rothschild family and its vassal in Europe has put them into panic. In desperation, its slaves in Ukraine are trying very hard to create false flag operations against Russia, as a means of pulling the US into a direct conflict with Russia. The US is beginning to exit from Europe, thus leaving itself to face an angry Russia alone. London is very angry at Trump by saying that Europe and Ukraine will play no role in the coming Russia-US talks to end the war. London’s EU vassals are insisting that Europe cannot be left out. In short, Europe has been relegated to the wilderness. This is a huge blow to the control of Europe by the Rothschild’s. The British are pushing Zelensky to ignore the Americans and to “continue” the war against Russia. The British PM Starmer has stated that Ukraine will be admitted into NATO-angering Trump even more. In recent days, statements by Trump’s new cabinet members are making have stated that the US will withdraw troops from Europe. Furthermore, the tariffs threats to the EU have cowed them into silence.

 4 The Cease Fire Talks

 Putin and his A-Team are looking at this panic in Europe and are laughing like crazy. They are looking at the Rothschild’s being cornered and confused. Moscow refuses to talk with Europe, as Putin says that the EU has no sovereignty.  It turns out that Russia and the US – Putin and Trump – did something totally wild. They picked up a phone; probably even a landline, like something out of a history book; all while the EU was bravely ‘sticking it to Putin’ by flaming him on social media. In the wake of that call, Trump has now begun the process   of immediate negotiations for peace. And now the EU is acting like it’s just been dumped by Uncle Sam, who’s committing the added insult of hanging around with the guy on whom they’ve obsessively hated. “If there is agreement made behind our backs it will simply not work because you need for any kind of deal, any kind of agreement, you need Europeans to implement this deal. You need the Ukrainians to implement this deal,” said the bloc’s chief diplomat, Kaja Kallas. 

On 12 February at 8:53 AM, President Trump issued this statement on his TruthSocial platform: ​I just had a lengthy and highly productive phone call with President Vladimir Putin of Russia. We discussed Ukraine, the Middle East, Energy, Artificial Intelligence, the power of the Dollar, and various other subjects. We both reflected on the Great History of our Nations, and the fact that we fought so successfully together in World War II, remembering that Russia lost tens of millions of people, and we, likewise, lost so many! We each talked about the strengths of our respective Nations, and the great benefit that we will someday have in working together. But first, as we both agreed, we want to stop the millions of deaths taking place in the War with Russia/Ukraine. President Putin even used my very strong Campaign motto of, “COMMON SENSE.” We both believe very strongly in it. We agreed to work together, very closely, including visiting each other’s nations. We have also agreed to have our respective teams start negotiations immediately to lead the negotiations which, I feel strongly, will be successful. There will be much weeping, gnashing of teeth in London, Brussels, Kiev and other European capitals – all good news.

With Putin and with Russia, the opposite is the case. Trump there has no leverage.  He has no leverage for three reasons: Firstly, since Russia steadfastly refuses the idea of any compromise that “boils down to freezing the conflict along the line of engagement, that will give time to the U.S. and NATO to rearm the remnants of the Ukrainian army – and then start a new round of hostilities”. Secondly, because Moscow’s conditions for ending the war will prove to be unacceptable to Washington, as they would not be susceptible to being presented as an American ‘win’. Thirdly, because Russia holds the clear military advantage: Ukraine is about to lose this war. Major Ukrainian strongholds are now being taken by Russian forces without resistance. This ultimately will lead to a cascade effect. Ukraine may cease to exist if serious negotiations do not take place before summer, the head of the Ukrainian Military Intelligence Budanov stated recently. The diplomatic onslaught by the Trump Administration during last weekend’s Munich Security Conference is still reverberating across Europe. The unexpected affront by Trump’s representatives, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of Defense Hegseth, has not only put the Transatlantic relationship on hold but is also seen as a significant move by the Administration to circumvent European partners and Ukraine—an unprecedented effort by the U.S. to impose a peace deal with Russia.

In the coming weeks, all eyes will be on Saudi Arabia, where the Kingdom is expected to host a direct meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. More is at stake—Trump’s transactional diplomacy is not just about Ukraine but about securing business deals, targeting not only Moscow but also Saudi Arabia and the broader Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The Riyadh Summit could be more about money than peace. Trump’s proposal to meet with Putin in Saudi Arabia is tied to investments, a stronger U.S.-Saudi relationship, and a broader restructuring of the Middle East. With one stroke, Trump has thrust Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) into the spotlight. Trump’s admiration for strong, young leaders plays a role, as does Saudi Arabia’s geopolitical influence in the region and its ability to balance relationships between Russia and the U.S.

By spotlighting MBS, Washington appears to be pressing Riyadh to advance a deal with Israel while opening doors for Saudi and other Gulf investments in the U.S.

5. The EU

  Washington wants to move away from unilateral patronage and transform military-political cooperation and trade in America’s interests. Such a move would entail huge financial losses for Europe. After all, Western Europe has entrusted its security almost entirely to the Americans since 1945. And in terms of trade on the American market, the Europeans have enjoyed full preferential treatment since the Marshall Plan. On his second day in office, Trump threatened the European Union with tariffs. According to the head of state, trade with the EU is a deficit for the United States. The US buys $300 billion more than it sells on the European market. This imbalance can only be corrected by increasing imports of expensive American energy. If the Europeans do not want to buy more oil and natural gas from the ‘world hegemon’, the Oval Office will decide to impose tariffs on European products. The United States accounts for about 20 percent of all goods exports from the European Union. Together with the loss of the Russian market, this will be a major blow to the Rothschild-regimes in Germany, France and other countries.

 The US is withdrawing from the Ukraine conflict, and has passed the buck over to the British. The US is winding down its aid to Ukraine. Trump has told the EU governments to pay for the war. The only way they can do that is to raise its defense pending. Trump’s stance on NATO spending is getting tougher. “We’re protecting them. They don’t protect us. So I don’t think we should pay. I’m not sure we should spend anything. But we should definitely help them. But they should raise the 2 percent to 5 percent,” the US president said. It is simply unrealistic to meet Trump’s demand and increase funding to 5% of GDP. It will trigger a storm of protest in European society. Social programs will have to be cut; and that automatically means defeat at the next election. It is likely that the strong pressure on the issue of military spending could be a cunning plan by the White House to destabilize the strong position of the euro bureaucracy- which is completely under Rothschild control. Europe’s political class faces a terrible dilemma. Either lose the US military umbrella in a proxy war with Russia, or make concessions to Trump and risk electoral positions.

Europe left out?

Great Britain and European powers might not like what’s coming, but there is probably little they could do about it if Russia and the United States decided to move in this direction. Over the last 30 years they’ve essentially disarmed and rendered themselves wholly dependent on the United States. The British establishment saw all this coming too: in a report issued by the House of Lords in December 2018 titled, “they conceded that their “Special Relationship” with the United States was the “top priority and cornerstone of what we wish to achieve in the world.” They warned that the second Trump administration could jeopardize, or even end the special relationship. Ouch!

All these developments will, of course, have momentous consequences in the markets and trigger large-scale price events affecting the security markets and currencies of Britain, Canada, the EU as well as the United States. The coming four years will not be boring .Nothing happens overnight, but over weeks, months and years, the changes compound. Washington expects to be reimbursed by Kiev for the “investments” it has made in the Ukraine conflict, US National Security Adviser Michael Waltz told on Sunday. He argued that repaying the American people would be the best way for the country to ensure continued assistance in the future. Waltz’s remarks came after Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky reportedly “politely declined” to sign a document granting the US rights to 50% of his country’s future mineral reserves, allegedly seeking a “better deal.”

US President Donald Trump has recently demanded the “equivalent of $500 billion worth of rare earths” from Ukraine in exchange for what he estimates to be “more than $300 billion” that Washington has provided to Kiev in various forms of aid amid its conflict with Moscow. “The American people deserve to be recouped, deserve to have some type of payback for the billions they have invested in this war,” Waltz said on Sunday. “I can’t think of anything that would make the American people more comfortable with future investments than if we were able to be in a partnership and have the American people made whole.” The top adviser added that Zelensky “would be very wise to enter into this agreement with the United States.”  Zelensky has previously stated that he wants to establish a mutually beneficial “partnership” rather than simply handing over Ukraine’s natural resources. Meanwhile, his prime minister, Denis Shmigal, has proposed to Ukraine’s resources in exchange for cooperation with Kiev and investments in the country’s reconstruction. Waltz also claimed that the US “has borne the brunt” of Western military and financial aid to Kiev. Officially, the US Congress has authorized roughly $175 billion for Ukraine since 2022, though a significant portion of that funding has gone to American industries and government activities related to the conflict.

According to Germany’s Kiel Institute for the World Economy, as of October 2024, the US had provided Ukraine with approximately $92 billion in financial and military assistance, while EU nations and the UK had allocated a combined $131 billion. A 2024 World Economic Forum report noted that Ukraine “holds immense potential as a major global supplier of critical raw materials” essential for defense, high-tech, and the green energy industries. The country has Europe’s largest titanium and lithium reserves, although these are not classified as rare earth elements. Zelensky has previously acknowledged that much of Ukraine’s mineral-rich territory is now under Russian control. According to Forbes, around $7 trillion worth of Ukraine’s former mineral wealth is located in the Donetsk and Luhansk.

Vance shocks the EU at the Munich Security Conference

Vance’s speech to Europe stole the show, however. It’s now being hailed as the most momentous geopolitical address since Putin’s seminal speech at the 2007 Munich conference. Vance essentially upbraided Europe for being weak and falling out of line with mutual American interests and shared values. One can view the video on social media.European compradors were up in arms. Germany’s Pistorius launched a counter-attack, dedicating his speech to refuting Vance’s claims, while Kaja Kallas whiningly accused the US of trying to “pick a fight” with Europe:  Really hard not to make the parallel between JD Vance’s speech right now at the Munich Security Conference and Putin’s 2007 speech at the very same podium. Both were watershed moments that fundamentally transformed the existing consensus. Putin at the time delivered the speech that marked the beginning of the end of the unipolar moment. JD Vance’s speech will probably be remembered as the speech that marked the beginning of the end of the post-WW2 Western alliance.

The takeaway is this: we spoke for months about the deteriorating European “solidarity” behind the scenes, and today the case was fully broken open for the world to see. Zelensky and Ukraine gained nothing, rather suffering repeated humiliations and being shunted aside like red-headed runts. The West has been exposed as having no consensus on anything—it’s frayed alliances look wayward, rudderless, and increasingly desperate. The conference thus far has left Europe reeking like a fetid roadside carcass. There is nothing but disillusion and disarray as the globalists scramble like crazed hens to keep the trembling house of cards up. Time is running out.

Things are moving ahead even more swiftly than imagined. The Ukraine-US honeymoon is officially over as Trump and Zelensky unleashed scathing new attacks against each other, which can only precipitate fatal repercussions for Zelensky’s career in the near future. After Zelensky’s critical statements aimed at Trump’s claims of stolen money, Trump fired back with this shocking censure, which called Zelensky a dictator:  US Vice President JD Vance warns Zelensky he will regret ‘bashing’ Trump and condemns the Ukrainian president’s ‘appalling’ response to peace talks, the Daily Mail reports. ‘The idea that Zelensky is going to change the president’s mind by smearing him in the media – anyone who knows the president will tell you that’s a disgusting way to deal with this administration,’ Vance said.  Discussions about the withdrawal of US troops from all NATO states that joined the alliance after 1990 are one of the goals of the talks between Russia and the US, an Eastern European And as we further discussed here, this itself is part of a much larger planned reimagining of the entire European security architecture, which includes the US’ relationship to post-war Europe. As part of this, rumors now abound of Trump’s plan to oust the increasingly troublesome Zelensky in order to set the stage for an amenable peace: And BILD, amongst security official tells BILD, “According to our information, it is about Putin’s 2021 demands, i.e. a withdrawal of US troops from all NATO states that joined the alliance after 1990.” The implication for the rest of Europe is also alarming. EU officials believe Trump is likely to agree to withdraw US troops from the Baltics and perhaps further West, leaving the EU vulnerable to a Russian army that NATO governments warn is preparing for a larger conflict beyond Ukraine.  If there’s truth to this, then it is obvious the secret portions of negotiations between the US and Russia are in fact slowly moving toward Putin’s vision of a new restructuring and understanding between Russia and the West. This would reset the clock back to the Gorbachev era and would single-handedly provide a security guarantee and a show of good faith that could allow Russia to, for once, feel at ease about the West’s inexorably threatening expansion eastward.

The US would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions, which would be a calamitous event for the Brussels dictatorship: without the ever-present “threat” of an ‘enemy power’ with which to fear-monger citizens, the regime of the EU-owned Rothschild will crumble into dust.

The Rothschild-owned EU and ECB are centralizing power and money within Europe. The aim is to remove sovereignty from the individual European states to boost Rothschild power in order to protect the Zionist Project-Israel. As the “center” becomes stronger, Rothschild demands for a EU army, and to boost defense spending to “counter Russia”. The Rothschild media pushes the narrative that “the Russians are coming “nonsense, putting fear into the people. In short, the Rothschild family is draining the EU governments and its citizens in order to stay relevant. But, across the board, they are losing. Both its bases, London and Paris, is in a state of utter shell-shock. And so are its vassals.

This goes along with Trump’s other revealed initiative to not only cut the entire US defense budget by 40%, but to bring China and Russia onto a trilateral agreement to mutually cut their defense spending, essentially demilitarizing and de-escalating the entire globe—which would lead to every other nation following suit.

The Paris Meeting

While peace talks began in Riyadh between Russia and the US, the Rothschild’s organized an opposite meeting in Paris, dubbed the “war party” by the US media. Its principal cheerleaders were Britain and France, along with a few of their key puppets in the EU. It ended in a fiasco with no agreement between themselves. Then the Rothschild’s chief poodle, Starmer, coached him to have a press conference, which insulted Trump. This was the “straw that broke the camel’s back.” Trump and the America First and the MAGA crowd in the US were furious. The gloves have come off. Suddenly, the media in the US is now publishing plenty of skeletons in Zelensky’s cupboard. This was previously banned. These revelations are now turning the American people against Zelensky, Ukraine and the British.

The Rothschild’s, in turn, are bringing up all those old and discredited lies about “Russiagate” and that Trump is “Putin’s stooge”, but all to no avail. The Americans are waking up to this false British lies. The Rothschild media and political class in Europe and the US are making loud noises against Trump, all to no avail. What this has done is publicly expose those politicians in Washington that support the war in Ukraine, and they find that it is the same people who also support the genocide in Gaza. The Rothschild’s –through Starmer, Macron and Sholz are boasting, promising and threatening to do one thing or another to support Ukraine through the supply of soldiers, equipment and funds. But, this is all smoke as the EU is beyond broke, and de-militarized, and a shell of a military force. But, that is what the Rothschild crowd in the EU and Israel have been reduced to – just talk. Trump has seen the perfidious role of Starmer and Macron in supporting Zelensky. He has not forgotten the role of the British in stealing the 2020 elections in favor of Biden. All of this bodes badly for the Rothschild’s; a good thing too.

Britain is broke & its Empire is on the verge of collapse

A series of bizarre developments that have unfolded in Great Britain over the last few weeks suggest that its financial system came to the verge of collapse, probably as a consequence of Ukraine’s debt default. The last thing the people in power will tell us is the truth, but if we dig in dark places and connect the dots, I believe the conclusion practically makes itself. The consequences for Britain, and probably for “his majesty’s” other dominions will be extreme. Let’s dive in…

 It is clear that the UK has continued making all the mistakes made by other decaying empires, particularly in terms of foreign adventurism. A sudden deterioration, which developed during the course of this year seems to be related to the Western powers’ defeat in their proxy war against Russia. Britain has been the principal cheerleader and sponsor of that conflict, and she seems to have gone “in over her head.” In addition to providing at least £7.5 billion in military aid (nearly $10 billion), Britain gave another £5 billion ($6.5 billion) to Ukraine in financial support. Furthermore, Britain has also guaranteed multiple tranches of World Bank loans to Ukraine and many British financial institutions have purchased billions’ worth of Ukraine’s bonds. Others made extensive direct investments there. In the timeline that follows we’ll trace the way Britain’s perfect storm shaped up in Ukraine.

Timeline of Ukraine’s slow-motion train wreck

It was clear that 2024 was a bad year for Ukraine. Public sentiment across Europe picked up on that, as confirmed in January by the European Council of Foreign Relations. It found that only 10% of the EU citizens believed that Ukraine could defeat Russia. A few weeks later things got still bleaker after Russian forces captured the strategically important town of Avdeevka.

But in addition to the near-certain military defeat, Ukraine was also facing a looming economic and financial collapse. Ukraine’s economic performance was already dismal before the conflict with Russia started in February 2022. But since that time, it has collapsed by another 50%.  Keeping Ukraine’s government and military in operation has become entirely dependent on her Western backers. But by 2024, that support began to dry up as more and more decision makers started to doubt Ukraine’s prospects.  A World Bank official involved with the matter said that Ukraine was facing bankruptcy. Significantly, he added that, as with previous transactions, the World Bank did not provide its own funds for Kiev, but “once again took advantage” of guarantees from two of Ukraine’s donors, primarily Japan and the UK.  Of the $1.5 billion given to Ukraine, $984 million of the sum originated from Japan and $516 million from Britain. But Ukraine is now unable to service her mounting foreign debts.

On May 4, the group of foreign bondholders, including such behemoths as BlackRock, PIMCO and France’s Amundi put pressure on the government of Ukraine to start repaying some of its debts. Back in July 2022, this group elected to pause repayments of some $20 billion in bonds they had previously issued. That agreement was due to expire on August 1, 2024. And here we’re still talking about only $20 billion out of Ukraine’s total debt of $161.5 billion! Given the catastrophic state of the country’s finances, the repayment of these debts would collapse Ukraine’s government and its economy. The government of Ukraine was advised by Rothschild & Co as financial advisors and White & Case LLP as legal advisors (odd how the same names tend to crop up in the works wherever a land is drenched in blood).

Thursday, 18 July 2024: Zelensky arrives in London

Zelensky arrived for an official visit to London. Speaking at the event, Zelensky underscored that the UK had been “one step ahead in its determination to support Ukraine” since the Russian invasion began. The summit concluded, apparently with the aim   to target Russia’s “shadow fleet” of tankers: some 600 vessels enabling Russia to evade West’s oil sanctions. Now, fast forward to December-January 2024/5.

Recently, British Intelligence has been conducting operations in the Mediterranean Sea, sabotaging Russian oil tankers. Three oil tankers have been damaged in the Mediterranean in the past month; have been damaged in the Mediterranean in the past month. These ships were damaged by blasts; however, the causes remain unknown. These incidents mark the first time, in decades, that non-military vessels have endured blast damage in the Mediterranean.  A total of four explosions damaged three vessels off the coasts of Italy, Turkey, and Libya, sources revealed. 

In the first incident, the Greek-operated crude oil tanker Seajewel was stuck by two explosives at a port in northern Italy, on Saturday. The explosions occurred 20 minutes apart, with the first causing a one-meter inward breach below the waterline of the tanker. Savona’s prosecutor said the vessel was at anchor in front of Savona-Vado port. 

The second case involved the crude oil tanker Seacharm, which was damaged off the Turkish Mediterranean port of Ceyhan in late January.  The final incident involved the Liberia-flagged chemical and products tanker Grace Ferrum, which was damaged off Libya’s coast. One source told Reuters that the vessel would require a salvage operation due to the extent of the damage. 

It is worth noting that all three of the vessels had recently called at Russian ports. In late December 2024, the Russian Foreign Ministry said that a Russian cargo ship Ursa Major sank in the Mediterranean after an explosion targeted its engine room. The Rothschild’s just don’t give up in their demented ways. It comes naturally to the “godfather of modern terrorism.”

Tuesday, 6 August 2024: Ukraine launches Kursk incursion

Ukraine launched a surprise incursion into the Kursk region of Russia. The plan to attack the Kursk region had been made at least a year earlier, but it was never implemented, most likely because strategically, it made little sense.  What we do know is that Ukraine launched the incursion only 18 days after Zelensky’s visit in London. Zelensky’s security advisor admitted that.  On August 18, The Sunday Times of London revealed that Britain played the pivotal role in the operation: “Unseen by the world, British equipment, including drones, have played a central role in Ukraine’s new offensive and British personnel have been closely advising the Ukrainian military… on a scale matched by no other country.”

British finances deteriorated with its backing for Ukraine. Fear had gripped the Rothschild financial conglomerate within the UK. Desperation has forced them to steal the interest income from the seized Russian deposits, to be used as “collateral” for issuing bonds to raise more funds for the Ukraine Project. The next bombshell lobbed at the Rothschild’s from Trump, is that – – – “any future arms supplies to Ukraine must be paid for in cash from the EU, BEFORE it is shipped off to Ukraine”- an almost impossible condition to meet by the EU.  The BOE (Bank of England is in the Rothschild orbit) is now anxious about Britain’s financial system collapsing and it has resolved to avert the collapse in the worst possible way: by loosening its credit standards and accepting junk quality collateral in exchange for cash. This is the clearest possible sign that the system has come to the verge of collapsing. Not so long ago, we had a glimpse of just how fragile Britain’s financial system is. When the BOE tried to raise some $45 billion by selling government bonds, there were no buyers, thus forcing the BOE to buy them! What’s peculiar about the British financial system is that the taxpayers are obliged to reimburse the Bank of England for any losses it sustains on its balance sheet assets. If the price of gilts on the bank’s balance sheet collapses, British taxpayers must cover those losses and make the bank whole. So, what kind of money are we talking about? As the the BOE has estimated it will require the Treasury to transfer a total of £150 billion by 2033 to cover expected losses on the central bank’s quantitative easing program.

In all, the situation is impossible and all the cabinet reshuffles and cosmetic patches changed nothing of substance in the UK; they amounted to a sort of rearranging the deck-chairs on the Titanic as the ship is already sinking.

So where is all this headed? Let’s have a peak at the economic and social conditions in the UK to consider the possible outcomes of the crisis.

The Dying Economy

In addition to making heavy direct investment in the “project Ukraine,” Britain has sustained high indirect costs as a consequence of sanctions imposed on Russia. Today, large segments of British society are slumping into poverty. According to last year’s figures from the number of people in the UK who needed emergency food supplies from food banks more than doubled.  One in five households have trouble paying their water bills, and many more are struggling to keep up with their energy bills. Electricity bills in the UK are over five times higher than the European average and will substantially increase this winter again. In February this year, The Guardian published an article titled, “Its opening paragraph states that, “Britain is in the throes of a hidden poverty epidemic, with the worst-affected households living in squalor and going without food, heating and everyday basics.”

The Parasite is Killing the Host

When businesses are losing sales to poverty, rather than competition, we know that the parasite is killing the host. The parasite, of course, is the banking cartel and it doesn’t care about the plight of the ordinary British people.  None of this is accidental; it’s not like Britain has been cursed with the bad luck of having consistently incapable or uncaring governments. Rather, the policy of immiserating the British people has been sustained and deliberate. According to a report written in 2018 by Prof. Phillip Alston, UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, a “systematic, willful, concerted, and brutal economic war” was being waged against the poor and vulnerable sections of British society. Since then, things have only gotten a whole lot worse: for British families, 2025 is shaping up to be a financial disaster.

Now, if these policies were deliberate, then what is their objective?  The chancellor Jeremy Hunt wants to “undertake a root-and-branch review of universal credit.” But the “universal credit” Brown was mentioning is merely the lure. The actual bill of goods that Brown was selling as he feigned outrage over poverty he himself helped create, was forcing a neo-feudal subjugation on British citizens by making them dependent on the nanny state for handouts. This is why his partner in crime, Tony Blair (who earns money as being an “international advisor” for the Rockefellers at JP Morgan Chase) has been pushing so hard to introduce a digital ID in the UK. It will be needed to police British people’s obedience and compliance with whatever rules, norms or restrictions that the ruling establishment might demand. It could be vaccinations, confinement to 15-minute cities, carbon quotas, death panels, insect protein fodder, love for the big brother, military conscription, forever wars, etc. Now that their ship has sunk in Ukraine (and in the Middle East), they need these measures in place, yesterday! This is not progress toward greater prosperity and freedom but rather a future of serfdom.  Britain’s not so excellent misadventure in Ukraine tore the last shiny fragment from her democratic façade, revealing her feudalistic, authoritarian rule by an unelected, unaccountable and depraved oligarchy- the Rothschild family and its associated networks of power.

 History suggests that such regimes ossify and have a certain tendency to drag their host nations into dark ages where they may remain mired in backwardness for generations. It remains to be seen whether the British people will find the strength and determination to fight back and win a better future for the coming generations. I sincerely hope that they will fight back. The same fight is gathering for all of us in the Western world. These changes will impact the financial markets in Britain and her dependencies like Australia and Canada. As the empire unravels – good riddance – it will create opportunities for major windfalls and opportunities. The story continues in Part 3, https://behindthenews.co.za/rockefeller-change-of-strategy-under-trump-part-3-of-a-3-part-series/