The Rothschild Control over the Media
The Rothschilds rose to power in the 19th century. The family dealt mainly with governments. One major reason for the historical blackout on the role of the international bankers in political history is that the Rothschilds are Jews. The preceding 12 centuries have witnessed many acts of violence against European Jewry- for various reasons.
To avoid similar acts against the Jews in Europe in the 19th century, the family bought many newspapers. This would reduce the possibility of any incitement against Jews, plus the media would report favourable stories instead. This control of European media enabled the family and its allies to conduct many operations outside of any limelight.
By the start of World War 1 in 1914, the majority of the newspapers in Europe were firmly in the Rothschild orbit. With the outbreak of war, Britain turned its focus to the US. And, this is where this story starts.
The Rockefeller Control over the Media
John D Rockefeller formed the Standard Oil company in 1870. By 1900, the company became one of the largest companies in the world, besides becoming the world’s largest oil company. His rise to this status that John D was conditioned by his over-riding motto – “competition is a sin!”. Manyof those who opposed him were destroyed. This ruthlessness turned the people against him.
John D began to buy many newspapers. The family have never been one to leave public opinion to chance. The family uses leverage to to maximise the power of their investments in industry and finance. They follow the same principle when they buy influence over education. They do not pour money into the local school boards; rather into the schools that train the teachers and they finance the writing of textbooks. Now that every public school is at the mercy of the Department of health, Eduication and Welfare or HEW ( which Nelson Rockefeller created in the 1950s), the family couldn’t care less who controls the local school board.
The family grab at the apex of whatever instrumentality they wish to control. The influence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the federal government is concentrated in the Executive Branch. That is where the action is – at the top. And so it is with Rockefeller control of the media. They are not interested in controlling the local suburban or metro newspaper. They go for the leaders in the field.
In the old days, John D sent his agents out to bribe editors and to buy small papers, but that is very inefficient and antiquated in the electronic age. Now the local papers are dependent on wire services and syndicated colunists to fill their news and editorial pages. This stranglehold extends to radio and TV. The internet was created by the Pentagon, and is still under their control.
The family made sure that the real movers and shakers in the field of mass communications have been initiated into their CFR- America’s premier think-tank and elite club. Given this kind of power over the media, the family is treated with kid-gloes by the media. The involvement of the Rockefellers with the media has multi-multi implications. One is that the faily’s plans for a World Government are never discussed in the mainstream media – the MSM. The family decides what issues the media discusses. They can turn on the poverty issues or turn it off. The same holds true for any issue, be it Covid, the Ukraine or Gaza conflict, or LGBTQ, etc. The media can take a man and make him an instant folk hero. Or they can take an enemy of the Rockefellers, like Putin, and create the image that he is a demon, tyrant or a dangerous paranoid. The use of psycology and propoganda, or brainwashing, was developed in the West in such places as the Rockefeller-financed Tavistock Institute in Britain. The hidden persuaders from Madison Avenue and think-tanks such as the Rand Corp and Hudson Institute can and do manipulate public opinion. The elite refer to it as”the engineering of consent”. That means we are made to think the manacles they are slipping on our wrists are love bracelets. With money the Rockefellers gained control of the media. With the media the family gained control over public opinion. With control over public opinion, they gained control of politics. And with control of politics, they took control of the nation.
In the revelation of propaganda as a tool of public mind control and its use for war marketing, it is worthwhile to examine the historical background of Bernays’ war effort. At the time, the European Zionist Jews had made an agreement with England to bring the US into the war against Germany, on the side of England, a favor for which England would grant the Jews the occupation of Palestine for a new homeland. Palestine did not ‘belong’ to England, it was not England’s to give, and England had no legal or moral right to make such an agreement, but it was made nonetheless. The Jews had created in US President Wilson an intense desire to enter the war, but the American population had no interest in the European war and public sentiment was entirely against participating. To facilitate the desired result, Wilson created a body named the Committee on Public Information (CPI), to propagandise the war by the mass brainwashing of America. The group was led by a muckraking publicist/advertising man named George Creel, and the CPI was known as “The Creel Commission”, but it appears Creel was only a ‘front’, with little contribution to the events that actually occurred. The CPI was staffed with a heavy slate of psychologists and carefully-selected men from the media, academia, advertising, and the movie and music industries. Two of the most important members were Walter Lippmann, whom Wilson described as “the most brilliant man of his age”, and Edward Bernays, who was the group’s top mind-control expert, both Jews and both aware of the stakes in this game. Bernays planned to combine his Uncle Freud’s psychiatric insights with mass psychology, blended with modern advertising techniques, and apply them to the task of mass mind control. Movies were already powerful new tools for misinformation and opinion control, as was radio and TV would soon be added to this list.
“Wilson’s agreement to create the CPI was actually a turning point in world history, the first truly scientific attempt to form, manipulate and control the perceptions and beliefs of an entire population.”
With Wilson’s authority, these men were given almost unlimited scope to work their magic, and in order to ensure the success of their program and guarantee the eventual possession of Palestine, these men and their committee carried out “a program of psychological warfare against the American people on a scale unprecedented in human history and with a degree of success that most propagandists could only dream about”.
In all of this, Lippmann and Bernays were not working independently or without guidance. Prior to their massive ‘war effort’ in the US, they had operated a successful pilot test case in the UK, using British newspapers owned by their controllers, primarily Rothschild, to determine the efficacy of their methods. You may want to think about this next sentence and apply it to recent world events. “They (Bernays and his group) practiced revealing fabricated stories of atrocities, false accusations of terror and brutality against any nation or people they wanted the public mind to view as “the enemy”, then tested and evaluated public reactions to their manipulations of this false propaganda.” It was Bernays who created “war marketing”, the theory and the template for the manipulation of public opinion, the plan and pattern for the propaganda and lies that the US government would use repeatedly for the next century to successfully deceive the American public about its motivations and actions in more than 100 military adventures, and to blind everyone to the tragic results of America’s brutal foreign policy. This is the man Americans celebrate today as “the father of Public Relations”.
The plan to mass-engineer public opinion began in a propaganda factory at Wellington House in London in the early 1900s, with Lords Northcliffe and Rothmere, Arnold Toynbee, and of course our two war-marketing geniuses Lippmann and Bernays. It was from this source that the scheme was hatched to force the Rothschild’s privately-owned Federal Reserve banks onto the US Congress, and that trained and coached Lippmann and Bernays on the methods of molding American public opinion to push the US into the First World War for the promotion of Zionism. Bernays’ book ‘Propaganda’ offers a clear vision of his training, not only for war marketing but for the pathology of American consumption, automobiles, the hysteria of patriotism and much more.
Funding reportedly came from the UK Royal Family, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and eventually included the formation of trans-Atlantic relationships. At various periods, memberships in the Tavistock Institute, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Rothschild’s Round Table, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, the Stanford Research Institute, the Trilateral Commission and NATO, were interchangeable. They also created the ideology for the large American Foundations like Rockefeller and Carnegie that today play a silent but major role in population management.
Wellington House eventually morphed into the Tavistock Institute, which was created at Oxford University in London by the founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Round Table (Rothschild again), and was essentially a kind of mass brainwashing facility beginning as a psychological warfare bureau. It was the Tavistock Institute’s studies in psychological programming that were used to create and then exploit a grand mass hysteria during the cold war, evoking fearful delusions of a nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union that even led to millions of Americans building bomb shelters in their back yards.
“It is impossible to fundamentally grasp the social, political, economic and cultural developments of the past 100 years without some understanding of Bernays and his professional heirs.”
Many dirty things emerged from this rat’s nest of Satan-worshippers, Everything we have seen, read, or heard in the past 100 years that demonised other nations, usually leading to military intervention or “color revolutions”, stems from this template by Lippmann and Bernays originally to support the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine and to promote the agenda of Zionism. This template has been in constant use by the US government since the World War I, ‘engineering consent and ignorance’ in the American and Western populations to mask nearly a century of atrocities, demonising innocent countries and peoples in preparation for 100 plus, politically-inspired ‘wars of liberation’ fought exclusively for the financial and political benefit of a handful of European and American bankers, using the US military as a private army for this purpose, resulting in the deaths and miseries of millions.
Tavistock Square in Bloomberry , London, birthplace of the Tavistock Institute
The Tavistock Institute
Britain’s Tavistock Institute operates principally through an octopus-like structure made up of think tanks, tax-exempt foundations, and law firms which, in tum, act to spawn civic movements, protest groups, political action committees, and even pseudo-religions, as it suits their purposes. Back in the immediate postwar period, some Establishment “spooks,” such as IBM founder Thomas “Pop” Watson, argued that the covert operations function should be run exclusively through private agencies such as the major Anglo-American multinational corporations, banks, and law firms.
In the highest circles of the British monarchy and its Club of lsles, this great power is not taken for granted. Rather, it is carefully manipulated and directed, to create and mold popular opinion. In 1991 Sir Alexander King wrote that new advances in communications technology will greatly expand the power of the media, both in the advanced and developing sectors. The media, he proclaimed, is the most powerful weapon and “agent of change” in the fight to establish a “one-world,” neo-malthusian order that will transcend and obliterate the concept of the nation-state.
In this project, the 2 networks (American and British) can count on cooperation from the media cartel. It can also call on the capabilities of a mass psychological warfare machine, also run by the British and their assets, which extends into key phases of media production, and includes writers and psychiatrists, who help shape the content, and the pollsters who fine-tune and analyze the impact on targetted populations.
Beyond this interacting network, there are millions of participants involved in the production, distribution, and transmission of media messages, whose thinking, in tum, has been shaped by the content of the media product, and who are, effectively, self-brainwashed by the culture within which they live.
The Tavistock ‘Mother’
The historic center of this mass psywar apparatus is based outside London, in the Tavistock Center. Established in the aftermath of World War I under the patronage of the Duke George of Kent, the original Tavistock Clinic, led by John Rawlings Rees, developed as the psychological warfare center for the royal family, British intelligence and the Rothschilds. Rees and a cadre group of Freudian psychiatrists, applied wartime experience of psychological collapse, to create theories about how such conditions of breakdown could be induced, absent the terror of war.
The result was a theory of mass brainwashing, involving group experience that could be used to alter the values of individuals, and through that, induce, over time the desired results. In the 1930s, Tavistock’s extended networks developed a symbiotic relationship with the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, created by European oligarchical networks, which focussed on the study and criticism of culture from a Freudian standpoint. In the late 1930s, with its operations transferred from Germany to the New York area, the Frankfurt School coordinated the first analysis of the impact of a mass media phenomenon, i.e., radio. With the outbreak of World War II, Tavistock operatives took effective control of the Psychological Warfare Directorate of the British Army, while its allied network in the United States embedded itself in the American psychological warfare apparatus. By war’s end, the combined influence of Tavistock (which became the Tavistock Institute in 1947) and of the former Frankfurt School operatives, had created a cadre of “psychological shock troops,” as Rees called them, and “cultural warriors” numbering in the several thousands. Today that network numbers in the several millions around the world, and it is the single most important factor in determining the design and content of mass media product.
Bringing about the “Short-Attention” Time Span
Rather than overturn the English language, it were easier to simplify the latter’s usage by example of the mass media news broadcasts. Radio newscasts, which had been made up of long descriptive commentaries before the war, took on the shorter formats that are featured today. The long sentences, often with literary overtones, gave way to shorter, more direct sentences and simple vocabulary. Television news has adopted this linguistic style: simple direct sentences, with a very, very limited vocabulary. Television newscasts, never too informative and erudite, have become less so in recent years, as they were forcibly dumbed down.
In recent times, this phenomenon is being witnessed through such social media apps such as tik tok. This leaves no room for using the intellect, but rather focusing on the emotion. This leaves great room for manipulation.
“Allowing ourselves to be influenced by the subtle but powerful illusions presented by television, leads to a kind of mass madness that can have rather frightening implications for the future of the nation. We will have begun to see things that aren’t there, giving someone else the power to make up our illusions for us. The prospect is frightening, and given our cultural heritage we should know better.”
“I know the secret of making the average American believe anything I want him to. Just let me control television. … You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV set images “.
Empire of the Mind’ Tavistock’s Imperial Brainwashing Project
Various types of belief can be implanted in many people, after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgment and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of “herd instinct,” and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility.
From Tavistock Institute psychiatrist Dr. William Sargant’s 1957 book, Battle for the Mind: “I think the subject that will be of most importance politically is mass psychology …. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are obstructive. Secondly not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten”.
“It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen”- Lord Bertrand Russell, in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science upon Society.
The success of a long-term project of the British imperial elite-headed by the Rothschilds, effectively keynoted in remarks by Winston Churchill to an audience of Anglophiles at Harvard University on Sept. 6, 1943. Churchill was then locked in battle with U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who had, on several occasions, made clear his intent to dismantle the British and all other empires at the conclusion of the war. While refusing to concede American authority to impose a “post-colonial solution” on the Empire, a consensus emerged in the imperial elite, among the families closest to the Rothschild family, that the old imperial structures could not be continued.
To maintain control, it was proposed to shift the battlefield, away from control of territory, to control of the minds, not merely of the colonial peoples, but of United States and the rest of the Western world. In his remarks, which were broadcast internationally, Churchill proposed that his Anglophile allies within the United States join with their Mother England in a new enterprise. It is our two countries, he said with his typical pompousness, that control the destiny of the world; who control science and technology; that control culture. These are weapons far more potent than military power, Churchill declared. To control what men think “offers far better prizes than taking away other people’s lands or provinces or grinding them down in exploitation. The empires of the future will be the empires of the mind.”
Churchill’s “secret weapon” in this battle for the mind was an elite group of brainwashers and psychiatrists, then operating in the Army’s Directorate of Psychological Warfare under the command of Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees. These were the cadre of the Tavistock Clinic, based in London’s suburbs; they had already built a network of co-thinkers in the United States in various university locations, including Harvard, and wartime operational bases within the Office of War Information and the Office of Strategic Services (OSS).
In addition, Britain’s psychological warriors had established a beachhead in Hollywood, in the emerging radio, television, and motion picture industries. At the end of the war, the Tavistock network, which numbered several hundred individuals; reentered civilian life, but remained under the central command of British policy circles. They proceeded to spawn numbers of think-tanks, institutes, and other “nodes” (Tavistock’s term for its various allied centers of activity) in every part of the globe, dominating every key aspect of social policy;
Today, the Tavistock core group numbers in the several score thousand. That core group, in tum, has trained more than 2 million cadres who serve as teachers and advisers to nearly all business, military, political, and educational elites. In ways subtle, and some not so subtle, operating as a conspiracy intervening on individual human consciousness, they have attempted to not only shape what people think, but to establish the parameters and limits of thought itself.
What is Tavistock? The Tavistock Center, located in buildings in the London suburb for which it is named, is composed of the Tavistock Clinic and the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, which in turn has five component institutions. Over the last five decades, it has founded a network of “international nodes,” which function as mini-Tavistocks, and are involved in joint projects. Its quarterly journal, Human Relations, published since 1947, serves as an effective briefing for the network on its more public work. The Tavistock network owes its origins to the 1920 founding of the Tavistock Clinic, under the direct patronage of the royal family, through HRH, Duke George of Kent (1902-42). The Clinic soon earned the nickname “the Freud Hilton,” for its promotion of the pseudo-science of psychoanalysis; however, it quickly broadened its horizons to include various other psychological theories. Unifying all of its theoretical studies, was the oligarchical view of man as a beast, whose impulses and urges could be controlled and tamed, as one does with animals. Freud was a psychologist who worked for the Rothschilds, and was a Satanist in his outlook. The subject of philosophy was recommended as a means to destroy rational and logical thinking processes. This program would greatly help in removing any belief in God, and if successful, remove the “competition” to grab hold of man’s soul. Many universities in the West have boosted this course. The results, after 7 decades of this nonsense, are clear for all to see. The majority of those that teach this subject, and its students, have become atheists.
Tavistock’s usefulness to its imperial masters can be gleaned from the work of its leader, John Rawling Rees. A virulent race patriot and believer in eugenical theories, Rees had studied “war neuroses” in France during World War I. His conclusion: Under controlled conditions, neurotic behavior could be induced, and, through these methods, individual behavior could be absolutely controlled.
In later years, Tavistock operatives would develop methods for inducing controlled, irrational behavior by groups of people. Tavistock, proposed that its theories be put in service as a means of social control during times of peace. Idiots would soon dominate civil society. It were therefore necessary to devise methods to control such people and prevent their increase in numbers, and to control their even larger populations in backward colonial lands that threatened the civilized world. Of the remainder of the population, there were some people who, if their neuroses could be controlled, might be useful to the very small group of people whose genetic breeding and psychological training allegedly suited them for leadership.
Within two years of the book’s publication, Tavistock had expanded its operations in Britain and the Empire, and enlarged its beachhead in the United States. To the Tavistock Clinic was added the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, to train and deploy the teams of “mobile psychiatric shock troops.”
Money poured into this effort from royal family-sponsored charitable trusts, as well as from the Rockefellers, the Mellons, and the Morgans, to name a few of the U.S. oligarchical families whose pockets opened to the Tavistock brainwashers. The British elites tabbed their Tavistock network to play a critical role in the postwar restructuring of their empire and its transition into the “Commonwealth.”
The UN bureaucracy itself was similarly infested with Tavistock-type group training programs to indoctrinate and control whatever cadres were sent through its mind mills. (Former Guyana Foreign Minister) Fred Wills described the UN bureaucracy as “the world’s longest, continuously run, brainwashing program” for developing sector leaders. Those who entered it, if they indeed ever came out, had lost all touch with reality. At the same time, Unesco set up educational and cultural programs in the colonial sector, which quickly became mechanisms for Tavistock-designed brainwashing.
When these methods of control failed, as they often did, the British Crown turned to the same Tavistock psychological warriors to devise methods for creating controlled terrorist “movements.” Tavistock operatives assisted army units in the creation of what were called “gangs” and “countergangs” in the colonial sector. The technique was laboratory-tested by Brig. Gen. Frank Kitson in the 1950s in Kenya, where brainwashing and torture were used on prisoners in British POW camps to create phony, British intelligence-controlled units of the Mau Mau insurgency. Legitimate national liberation movements, fighting to win freedom from the British yoke, were penetrated and broken, their leaders killed, ostensibly by “rival” factions.
In 1970, Kitson was sent to Northern Ireland, where he – not the Irish Republican Army-launched an urban murder and bombing spree that triggered a quarter century of violence and psychological terror. Following Rees’s departure from Tavistock, the man who ultimately took charge of the network was a Rees protégé, Eric Trist. Trist’s primary assignment was to expand Tavistock’s operations in the United States. But first, he launched a major Tavistock’s project: management training.
“Operational Research”
With the approval of the highest circles of the British elite, Tavistock’s brainwashers were contracted by the Empire’s corporate entities to “restructure” their management and workforces from within. One section of this was targeted at breaking the power of trade unions, by inducing them to become part of management teams (co-participation); but by far the largest component of these operations placed management itself through group-profiling and therapy-like sessions to force higher “productivity.”
Among the corporations put through this brainwashing were Shell, Unilever, the British government-run coal industry, and several major financial institutions. Today, most major corporations have staff psychologists, or contracts with them, while corporate meetings are often run by a group leader, called a “facilitator,” hired for the task.
The Tavistock brainwashers spoke of a period of successive social, economic, political, and cultural shocks beginning in the 1960s- a drug-rock-sex counterculture Thus, it should come as no surprise, that the British Empire, working largely through Tavistock, was the driving force behind launching the drug-rock-sex counterculture. Tavistock “shock troops,” were brought in to lead the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency’s 1950s and 1960s secret experiments with psychotropic drugs and mind control, known as MK-Ultra.
Tavistock fellow-traveler Aldous Huxley, the guru of the 1960s New Age movement, was living in Hollywood, working in the motion picture industry, and advocated societal drugging as the ultimate form of social control. Huxley was even more explicit about his and Tavistock’s agenda.
In a 1961 lecture, he said: – “There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak. Producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel-by propaganda, or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.” Tavistock oversaw the mass drugging of America’s college students in the late-1960s, helped launch “gangs and countergangs” which the zombified youth joined.
The collapse of the Soviet Union as a superpower created new possibilities for world governance and for the full entrance of the world into the post-industrial era. The greatest impediment to that change was the continued existence of the nation-state. As long as the Soviet Union existed, the continuance of the nation-based world system, in some form, was necessary to maintain a balance of power. It was now finally possible to look beyond that form, to a new system of world relations. That system is based on “the current trans-nationalization of world affairs whereby international relations of the nation-state system have been superseded or supplanted by non-territorial relations among private individuals, groups, and organizations.” In other words, governments should be replaced by corporations.
What is described, and proposed, is the reformation of the United Nations along lines already well in progress, to tum over all operations and key relations to an international network of hundreds of thousands of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other groups, of varying size, shape, and form. As the study reveals, virtually every one of these groups either traces its origin to the Tavistock network’s operatives, or is influenced by such operatives. Nearly all such key groups have funding connections to either the British oligarchy and its American spores;
The nation-state, says Tavistock, made the industrial age possible. Remove it, and the industrial age will die, replaced by what is called the “axial age,” to be defined by “informal relations,” with the main medium of communication between peoples and groups, being through computer interface. Such interface, now more commonly known as the “Internet,” can link these disparate groups, which Tavistock calls “global social change organizations,” and vastly enhance their activities and ease of deployment.
As for questions of sovereignty, they are soon to become even more meaningless, since the telecommunications Internet can pass through any defense, any border. The invisible empire of NGOs: One of the weapons that the British Empire has deployed against the nation-state in recent years is the “NGOs,” the nongovernmental organizations. Under the cover of defending “human rights” and the “environment,” or organizing “humanitarian relief,” NGOs are routinely used to target states for discreditation, subversion, civil war, democratic coups, and revolution.
The NGOs are a new phenomenon; however, the network is quite ancient, and spans everything from the privately owned foundations of Britain’s ruling families, to their single-issue conduits, with which the term is usually associated. This network, which elevates and topples politicians, manipulates public opinion, spawns new religious movements, plots revolutions, and assassinates heads of state, is in many respects as powerful as government bodies whose power flows from the two families. There are now over 2 million NGOs in the world today. Of these, a hard core of several hundred, run by the ruling families, guides the whole herd.
It’s the British Empire, Stupid!
In modern legend, the global British Empire disappeared in the late 19th Century, or at least at the end of World War II. It was replaced by the two superpowers—the Soviet Union and the United States—and now, with the demise of the Soviet Union, with the “hyperpower” the United States. A more dangerous delusion could not be held. For, the “new” British Empire has never been so powerful, or so close to implementing its schemes for global chaos and destruction. This empire is not to be confused with the United Kingdom, nor even the British Monarchy per se. Its model is that of the older Venetian oligarchy, which functions as a financial oligarchic system of families, foundations, and other institutions dedicated to preserving their power in perpetuity, and destroying all systems and forces, most especially the nation-state, which stand in their way.
As the British Empire becomes weaker, especially since the early 2000s, the American Empire has taken up the slack. The US has more resources at its disposal. The move to replace nation-states with NGOs and corporations is intensifying, especially with the failure of Project Ukraine, the crumbling of their globalization model, the collapsing trans-Atlantic financial system, and the deliberate destruction of an already weakened western social structure. The end of their global empires are in sight.
