LockDown – The Hidden Financial Agenda Part 2 (of a 3 Part Series)

The Green Agenda

Here is a brief summary of key precursors to Covid-19. In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation issued a Report, simply called the “2010 Rockefeller Report” – in May 2010 (until recently this report was available on internet). This report outlines in remarkable details what is happening today and has been happening since the beginning of 2020. It includes several scenarios that are supposed to follow each other.

The first one is called the “Lockstep Scenario”. That’s what is happening now. A hapless and clueless world population is thrown from one day to another into a pandemic from which there is no escaping – as all 193 UN members have subscribed to it, or were coerced or bribed into it. And this shocked world population is behaving in lockstep as they are told to do – by their government masters – isolate, wear masks, separate, live in quarantine – a series of well-thought out anti-social conditions, meant to break society, families and friends apart, and to condition the brain that this will be the new normal. Remember, a society in fear can be easier manipulated.

In this article, we will discuss the agenda of the Rockefeller family, who have been the brains behind the scam known as global warming aka climate change.

It was David Rockefeller who created and drove the wildly successful “Global Warming” strategy. He was heir to the Rockefeller ambition to create a global government by an elite. This goes back to the meeting between Alphonse Rothschild and John D Rockefeller in 1892, and before that to Cecil Rhodes’ (a Rothschild asset) founding of a secret society, the Round Table, of which Nathaniel Rothschild was the key member. The purpose of the society was to ‘bring the whole of the civilized world “under one ruler-ship- of creating a one-world government.  This was the idea proposed by Alphonse to John D Rockefeller in 1892, when they met to bring stability and end the oil wars between them. To that end, John D Rockefeller created and funded the League of Nations,(And constructed the building in Geneva in 1920, at a personal cost of $20 million) and then, after that project failed due to American scepticism, of the UN.

 David Rockefeller in his turn acted to strengthen, expand and control through generous funding the role of the UN. He was the common denominator amongst the groups descended from Rhodes original secret society, whose function is to plan and achieve a OWG by an elite.

In 1921, his father, John D Rockefeller (aka Junior) founded the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and son David was chairman of the CFR from 1970 until 1985. In 1954, David founded the Bilderberg, whose primary function is to oversee the “European project”. He served on its main board until the age of 98 (2013). In 1968 he founded the Club of Rome (CoR), the “apex of the New World Order”. In 1972, he founded the Trilateral Commission (TC) to bring together the elite of the US, Europe, and Japan to plan a one-world government.

The Club of Rome

 The Club of Rome is a global think-tank on behalf of the elite environment movement. Its main purpose is to formulate crisis through which the world can be united under a world government. From inception, it is apparent that the Club of Rome was seeking a strategy to provide a catalyst for radical change in society , in order to create order out of chaos.

The CoR first promoted the population scare of the 1970s, then, when that failed, environmentalism, and then finally, in 1977, global warming, which has succeeded only because of huge funding.

 On June 12, 1965, a conference was held at the Rockefeller estate Villa Serbelloni in Bellagio, Italy, with papers given by Henry Kissinger. Three years later, in April 1968, the Club of Rome was founded in Bellagio. Initial members were financiers, scientists, economists, politicians, heads of state, and industrialists from ten countries. This political body also brings together the multi-billionaire  Rockefeller and  Rothschild families along with political chameleons  and industrial magnates .

In 1969, the Rockefeller Foundation approved its first full-fledged environment effort program, which was supported for many years at the University of East Anglia in England, which in 2009 achieved notoriety as the center of the “climate-gate ´scandal.

 Since then, the CoR has produced a large number of reports proposing population reduction and global government on the basis of environmental crisis.

In 1971, an obscure NGO was started in Geneva, by a young man- Klaus Schwab-a former student of Henry Kissinger. 3 decades later, this man went on to found and start an entity called the World Economic Forum in Davos. So, now we know who the real power of the WEF is.

In 1972, the Club of Rome published the acclaimed report “The Limits of Growth”, which reveals directly racist ideas that the population tends to grow faster than the means of supply.  In 1974, their policy was:” The Earth has cancer, and the cancer is Man”.  And Prince Phillip stated ” If I “were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels”.

In 1974, the CoR published “Mankind at the Turning Point”. This report states that “- – mankind is faced by a multitude of crisis – the population crisis, the environmental crisis, the world food crisis, etc.”, and “- – the solution of these crisis can be developed only in a global context – – this would necessitate a new world economic order and a global resource allocation system “.

In December 1974, Kissinger took out a new policy of genocide called NSSM 200, or the National Security Study Memorandum. It targeted 13 third world countries with a fast growing population. The aim was to slow down, and if possible, REDUCE the populations in these targeted countries. This policy was issued upon the successful testing of the AIDS virus on the gay populations of New York City and San Francisco. The AIDS virus was developed by an American company called Litton Bionetics- within the Rockefeller orbit. And the hell that was AIDS was unleashed on a unsuspecting Third World population. Does it sound familiar? Especially now, 45 years later.

 Maurice Strong rose from being a dirt poor high school dropout to become an international wheeler-dealer. As a Rockefeller asset, Strong was a major force behind the global warming narrative. His crowning achievement was the 2nd Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Strong met David Rockefeller at the age of 18, and under Rockefeller patronage, was given a minor position at the UN and from there to a career in oil, and a parallel one as a mover and shaker in Canadian politics. So impressed by his work, David instructed the UN Secretary General U Thant to organize what became the first Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972.

 The Stockholm Conference signaled the beginning of modern environment diplomacy. As an outcome of the Summit, Strong founded and was the first director of the UN Environment Program (UNEP).

The meeting succeeded in achieving the goals of its organizers: to give widespread credibility to the fraudulent idea that man’s intervention on nature, in the form of scientific and economic development, necessarily leads to intolerable environmental abuse. That led to two decades of environmentalist assaults. The conference, built on the arguments that had been put forth in a book published (by the Club of Rome) that same year called Limits to Growth.

The First UN Conference on Human Settlements and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat 1) was held in Vancouver, Canada in June 1976. The issues were urbanization and how to facilitate it, the problems of population growth, and above all, the undesirability of private ownership. The most quoted passage from Habitat 1 concerns private ownership of, and public control of land “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals, and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social justice. If unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Public control of land is therefore indispensable to its protection as an asset and the achievements of long-term objectives of human policies and strategies.“

 The Rockefeller Foundation funds UN Habitat on an ongoing basis. The aim here is for the 2 families to own all the land, and remove-one way or another – private/public ownership of land. And, we can see now, in 2020, that most governments are broke, with zero chance of paying back any of these loans. No problem for the 2 families. They will take title to a couple million acres of land, in exchange for the loans. Once this is done, production of agriculture will drop to nothing, forcing everyone to eat synthetic and GMO- based foods. What a fast way to kill off humanity!

    Now, 20 years later, this same powerful zero-growth network prepared a new assault against the human species in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil June 1992.   Since its founding in 1968, the Club of Rome has played a pivotal role in the drive to impose a global neo-Malthusian order. This study represents its latest attempt to use quack “science” to justify policies that will mean mass misery and death.   The report applauds the idea of imposing a global energy tax, to drive down energy consumption levels in industry and agriculture, which will have the effect of driving down industrial and agricultural output as well. “Club of Rome members might consider carefully the reception that one of their ideologues received from the French population. Hugues de Jouvenel, a Club of Rome theoretician, was on a French radio interview (in October 1993), espousing euthanasia against the elderly, he charged that the “inactive” population in France was achieving higher standards of living, while the “active” population was experiencing a lowering living standard. He said that this situation must be “re-balanced,” and this produced a huge backlash from the French people.

The Global Cooling Scare

 As recently as the mid-1970s, the threat of global cooling, rather than global warming, was a recurrent theme in the media.  Then, in 1977, a  the Energy and Climate  report, produced by a Rockefeller employee came out that said , “ Scientific opinion tends to converge on global warming, not cooling, as the chief climate risk in the next century”.

Thus, from a position of warning about global cooling as late as 1976, by 1980, a mere four years later, the ‘ science was settled’ by Rockefeller and Strong in favor of global warming, caused by human emissions of CO2, as the most acute climatic problem.

For 20 years Maurice Strong was involved in the organization of UN conferences and the commissioning of UN reports which tied in global warming with global government. The apex of his career was the UNICED Conference at Rio.

The Global Warming Climate Change Scam

The global warming project has been characterized by fake data, dirty tricks, and relentless dishonesty, including a penchant for sensational and ludicrous claims of extreme weather events which foretell human extinction and climate meltdown. The many thousands of scientists who have protested the corruption of science and the demonization of CO2, through articles, petitions and letters to world leaders, have had no impact in the face of billions spent at every level of propaganda.

The change in emphasis from “global warming’ to ‘climate change’ was not just to duck the issue of the failure of nature to deliver the said warming. It simplifies the terminology and provides a one word term to describe the cult , i.e. the cult of climate – anyone who disagrees that an increase in CO2 will cause catastrophic global warming is now a “climate denier’. Suppression of dissent has become normalized, with calls for criminalization of ‘climate denial’.

The adoption of ‘global warming’ as a cause turned out to be a brilliant strategic move for the global government project, backed by huge sums, total commitment and inspired execution. Global warming is a global problem, they insist, that national governments alone cannot solve. The only solution, we are told, is a one world government.

In their 1994 book “The First Global Revolution,” they declared:

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

They claim the list of enemies is designed to unite people. In fact, it is needed to overcome what they see as the divisiveness of nation-states and to justify the establishment of one-world government or global socialism

They finally settled on global warming as the environmental issue best suited for their goal. Of course, the plan is just the beginning. The 1997  UN Kyoto Protocol was presented as a solution to the problem of human-caused global warming. Those who created the Protocol also created the problem. Through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) they produced the science required to support their claim. It is a well-thought out, well-planned, classic circular argument. Create the problem, create the proof of the problem — then offer the solution.

CO2 through Kyoto provided the religious basis for the agenda. Nations who developed their economies and became wealthy using CO2 were now supposed to pay for their sins by giving money to those nations who suffered. CO2 through Kyoto provided the political basis for the agenda: the redistribution of wealth with money taken from the successful developed nations and given to the less successful developing nations. This operation required one-world government and a world banking agency.

The Case of Germany

In 2011, acting on the advice of Joachim Schnellnhuber, of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Angela Merkel and the German government imposed a total ban on nuclear electricity by 2022, as part of a 2001 government strategy called the Energiewende or Energy Turn, to rely on solar and wind and other “renewables.” The aim was to make Germany the first industrial nation to be “carbon neutral.”

The strategy has been an economic catastrophe. Going from having one of the industrial world’s most stable low-cost and reliable electric generation grids, today Germany has become the world’s most expensive electric generator. According to the German energy industry association BDEW, at the latest by 2023 when the last nuclear plant closes, Germany will face electricity shortfalls.

At the same time coal, the largest source of electric power is being phased out to reach Net Zero Carbon. Traditional energy-intensive industries such as steel, glass production, basic chemicals, paper and cement manufacturing, are facing soaring costs and shutdowns or offshoring and loss of millions of skilled jobs. The energy inefficient wind and solar, today costs some 7 to 9 times more than gas.

Germany has little sun compared with tropical countries, so wind is seen as the major source for green power. There is a huge input of concrete and aluminum needed to produce solar or wind farms. That needs cheap energy—gas or coal or nuclear—to produce. As that is phased out, cost becomes prohibitive, even with no added “carbon taxes.” Germany already has some 30,000 wind turbines, more than anywhere else in the EU. The gigantic wind turbines have serious problems of noise or infrasound health hazards for residents nearby the huge structures and weather and bird damage. By 2025 an estimated 25% of existing German windmills will need replacement and waste disposal is a colossal problem. The companies are being used as the citizens realize what a disaster they are. To reach targets by 2030 Deutsche Bank recently admitted the state will need to create an “eco dictatorship.”

At the same time the German push to end gasoline or diesel transport by 2035 in favor of e-vehicles is on course to destroy Germany’s largest and most profitable industry, the auto sector, and take down millions of jobs. The lithium-ion battery-powered vehicles have a total “carbon footprint” when the effects of mining lithium and producing all parts are included, that is worse than diesel autos.

And the amount of added electricity needed for a zero carbon Germany by 2050 would be far more than today, as millions of battery chargers will need grid electricity with reliable power. Now Germany and the EU begin to impose new “carbon taxes,” allegedly to finance the transition to zero carbon. The taxes will only make electric power and energy even more expensive, insuring the faster collapse of German industry.


According to those advancing the Zero Carbon agenda, it is just what they desire: the deindustrialization of the most advanced economies, a calculated decades-long strategy to bring about the collapse of industrialized civilizations.

To turn the present world industrial economy backward to a wood-burning, windmill turning dystopia where blackouts become the norm as now in California and South Africa is an essential part of a Great Reset transformation under the Agenda 2030: UN Global Compact for Sustainability.

Merkel climate adviser, Joachim Schnellnhuber, in 2015 presented the radical green agenda of Pope Francis, the encyclical letter, Laudato Si, as Francis’ appointee to the Pontifical Academy of Science. And he advised the EU on its green agenda. In a 2015 interview, Schnellnhuber declared that “science” has now determined that the maximum carrying capacity of a “sustainable” human population was some six billion fewer people:

“In a very cynical way, it’s a triumph for science because at last we have stabilized something –- namely the estimates for the carrying capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people.”

To do that the industrialized world must be dismantled. Christiana Figueres, a World Economic Forum Agenda Contributor and former executive secretary of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, revealed the true aim of the UN climate agenda in a February 2015 Brussels press conference where she stated, “This is the first time in human history that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally changing the economic development model that has reigned since the Industrial Revolution.”

 Rockefeller, Merkel, Gates, Schwab and friends will do so by bringing living standards in Germany and the OECD down to levels of Ethiopia or Sudan. This is their zero carbon dystopia. Severely limit air travel, car travel, people movement, closing “polluting” industry, all to reduce CO2. Uncanny how conveniently the coronavirus pandemic sets the stage for the Great Reset and UN Agenda 2030 Net Zero Carbon.

Agenda 21

 This is another UN program. It is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally, and locally by UN entities, national governments and NGO’s in every area in which humans impacts on the environment. Agenda 21 addresses every aspect of modern life.

Any movement of populations that takes place will be highly controlled, and directed, by government regulations. This, after the 2 families take title to land, in exchange for debt forgiveness. These so-called population policies and programs, encouraged by the UN, will be used to bring about demographic transition, as it is referred to in Agenda 21. The Agenda plans to force people out of their quiet rural homes, and into crowded cities. This forced change will be brought about by causing an increase in the cost of water, sanitation, and other essentials, to higher income neighborhoods, thus making it too expensive to live in these areas. People will be forced into “human settlement areas”, which will be controlled by government. The eventual goal of this forced population movement into human settlement areas is to get rid of private property.

Agenda 21 is dominated by assumed, overriding and non-negotiable values:

  • The concept of biodiversity has to take precedence over other rights, even of human life
  • The non-negotiability of the Rockefeller catastrophic global warming narrative.
  • Agenda 21 is full spectrum domination by the Rockefeller family, and its allies. Nothing has been left out.
  • It guarantees both birth and death control
  • It promises the basic essentials of life in return for submission
  • It exchanges critical thinking for re-education and brainwashing
  • It destroys the epicenter of the family, society, and culture, allowing only one way to live. It groups the population into small contained areas to be more easily controlled
  • It takes away from some to give to others who will be more easily managed by the promise of a full belly and a warm shelter.

In 2015 the UN issued a document, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”  It includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals, extending an earlier Agenda21. The word sustainable is the key word. If we dig deeper it is clear it is code-word for a reorganization of world wealth via means such as punitive carbon taxes that will dramatically reduce air and vehicle travel. The less-developed world will not rise to the developed, rather the other way; the advanced civilizations must go down in their living standards to become “sustainable.” 

The decision to demonize CO2, one of the most essential compounds to sustain all life, human and plant, is not random. As Prof. Richard Lindzen an MIT atmospheric physicist puts it, “CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving – I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.”  It is a parasitical representation of the 1 % feeding off the 99%.  Agenda 21 aims to DIVIDE, DUMB DOWN, and CONQUER.

And, it is only going to get worse.

Meanwhile David Rockefeller created and funded a myriad of NGO’s, all dedicated to pushing the same message. The cost to the Rockefeller family amounts to more than $80 million a year- maybe even more. The 2 families working towards a one-world government are relying on a number of factors :

  • Moral blackmail
  • Fear
  • Ignorance about global warming: people avoid the global warming issue because they do not feel confident they will understand the science.

The Cecil Rhodes vision of global governance is well on track. Global warming fears are a tool for political and economic change – – – it has nothing to do with the actual climate. The moral of the story is this : If the ice age scare of the 1970s was bullshit then, then the global warming scare of today is bullshit now. All of this revolves around the Rockefeller family motto: “COMPETITION IS A SIN!”. Let me explain.

In the early 1900s, there was an assumption that an oil field will be productive, or have a shelf-life of 30 years. On this basis, the Rockefeller policy planners worked out future “scenario-planning” games on various issues. The family took the long view (30 years +) on social, political, economic, and global-control matters.

 By the mid-1960s, David and his brothers realized that a policy of under-investment in industry, infrastructure, education and technology would have a disastrous effect on their empire if they did not place burdens on their competitors. Of the many ideas brought up by their advisors, they chose the environment as the best weapon to use.

The aim was to slow down the pace of all of the above in Europe and Asia (then). Looking ahead, they could see potential competition from India, China, Russia, and several Asian and European countries. The idea behind this was to push up the operating costs of all these nations, so that their products will not be a competitive threat to products from their companies. With the rise of China over the past two decades, urgency was added to their plans, in terms of bringing it to fruition as fast as possible. Thus, saddling China Inc with higher operating costs. To a certain degree, this policy was successful, as we see China implementing a policy of cleaning up its air quality and environment pollution. It came at a high cost as China is slowing down its construction of coal-fired power stations (of which China has huge coal deposits), in favor of gas-fired power stations. We see many other countries follow suit, such as Germany, which has stopped building coal-fired power stations.

The ultimate aim is to retard progress of economies and society by pushing up the costs of production, of its competitors, be they nations or companies. Strangely enough, the leading companies in the field of providing equipment that reduces CO2 emissions from power stations and heavy industry are all controlled by the Rockefeller family.

This is the beauty of philanthropy. It costs you $1 through your various foundations to fund such projects through the UN and other bodies. Your competition then spends money to buy equipment from various Rockefeller companies, who realize massive profits from the sale of such. In short, a $1 investment brings them a return of $10 and more. Like I said, it is all about the money. Follow the money, and many answers will come to you.

 There are two converging trends here. A rising financial, speculative beast devouring a fading physical economy against its competition, who are doing the opposite to Wall Street and the City of London. These two trends have resulted in the 2 families pushing the Covid pandemic, along with a clamor for the Green Agenda.  

Within little more than a year everyone imaginable seems to have jumped on the bandwagon of the new green agenda of radical measures to “stop” climate change. What few realize is how carefully all this is being orchestrated to prepare a massive shift in global capital flows where a handful of financial giants stand to gain. From Greta Thunberg to Bonnie Prince Charles, the themes at Davos 2020 were dominated for the first time by the climate change agenda. What comes through the interstices of the meeting of some 3,000 of the world’s corporate giants is that a major global campaign is being orchestrated and it includes the world’s largest capital investment fund heads and the world’s major central bankers. 

It was no accident that Davos, the promoter of globalization, is so strongly behind the Climate Change agenda. And perhaps the most interesting in terms of pushing the new green agenda is Larry Fink, founder and CEO of the investment group BlackRock. 

BlackRock is no ordinary investment fund. Based in New York, BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager with some $7 trillion, under management invested in over 100 countries. That’s more than the combined GDP of Germany and France. They dominate the stock ownership of every major exchange in the world, and are the top shareholders of the major oil companies and world largest coal companies. Aspiring German CDU politician Frederick Merz has been chairman of the BlackRock Germany since 2016.

On January 14, 2020 just days before the Davos meeting featuring climate change, Fink published an unusual annual newsletter to corporate CEOs. BlackRock founder and CEO Larry Fink has jumped aboard the climate investing train big time.  Pictured here is Larry Fink.

He wrote in a closely read letter that guides numerous corporations seeking investment (from BlackRock) declaring that, “climate risk is investment risk; we will see changes in capital allocation more quickly than we see changes to the climate itself. In the near future, there will be a significant reallocation of capital.”  And a handful of the world’s largest money groups will steer that reallocation of capital we learn. This alone should give pause for reflection. Is there another agenda here? Yes, there is. The aim of this is to cripple their competition, while pushing up the cost of living in advanced economies.

How will Fink and friends shift their investment flows?  BlackWater plans to demand that companies it invests its $7 trillion into show proof that they are green compliant by, “making sustainability integral to portfolio construction and risk management; exiting investments that present a high sustainability-related risk, such as thermal coal producers; launching new investment products that screen fossil fuels; and strengthening our commitment to sustainability and transparency in our investment stewardship activities.”  Translated, if you don’t follow the demands of the UN, you lose big money. 

TCFD and SASB Look Closely…

As part of his claim to virtue on the new green investing, Fink states that BlackRock was a founding member of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).  TCFD was created in 2015 by the Bank for International Settlements, chaired by fellow Davos board member and Bank of England head Mark Carney. In 2016 the TCFD along with the City of London Corporation and the UK Government created the Green Finance Initiative, aiming to channel trillions of dollars to “green” investments. The central bankers nominated 31 people to form the TCFD. Chaired by billionaire Michael Bloomberg, it includes in addition to BlackRock, JP MorganChase; Barclays Bank; HSBC; Swiss Re, the world’s second largest reinsurance; China’s ICBC bank; Tata Steel, ENI oil, Dow Chemical, mining giant BHP and David Blood of Al Gore’s Generation Investment LLC. Note the crucial role of the central banks here.

And to further insure BlackRock and friends in the world of trillion dollar funds choose the right investment in the right companies, Fink states, “BlackRock believes that the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) provides a clear set of standards for reporting sustainability information across a wide range of issues…“ This is reassuring until we look at who makes up the members of the SASB that will give the Climate-friendly Imprimatur. Members include, in addition of course to BlackRock, there is Vanguard Funds, Fidelity Investments, Goldman Sachs, State Street Global, Carlyle Group, Rockefeller Capital Management These are all in the Rockefeller orbit), and numerous major banks such as Bank of America-ML and UBS(these last two are in the Rothschild orbit). So the very financial groups who today steer global capital flows to major mining and coal and oil projects since decades will now become the arbiters of what companies qualify to be blessed with money and which not for some future “green bond” investment.

The Origins of BlackRock

These origins go back to the Philippines, when the war ended in 1945, with the defeat of Japan. Beginning with the invasion of Korea in 1895, then onto China in the 1920s and 1930s, and then expanding into South-east Asia in the 1940s, The Japanese Army looted huge quantities of valuables, including cultural items, bank notes, gold, silver, platinum, and so on. The Japanese royal families were the main beneficiaries of this loot. It was conducted by Japan’s secret police in tandem with the royal family, in an operation code-named “Operation Golden Lily”. By January 1943, the US Navy had perfected the torpedo, and this was used to devastating effect on the Japanese Navy and its merchant fleet. Since they could not guarantee a safe passage of ships containing the loot back to Japan, the royal family then decided to bury the loot in 173 special hiding places in 1943-1945, mainly in the Philippines and Indonesia. A part of this was found by US intelligence when they re-captured Philippines in July 1945. And, more discoveries were made when Marcos took power.

Nelson Rockefeller decided not to disclose this fact, due to the nightmare of solving who owns what. So, then, they kept this for themselves, along with 1000s of tons of gold recovered in Europe from the Nazis in Germany-also stashed away in various bunkers and hiding places.

 The gold, silver, platinum and diamonds, and its proceeds, were put into an unofficial entity called the Black Eagle Trust. Now, almost 75 years later, this money has reached more than $5 trillion, at the very least. This is NOT counting the gold still in their possession. How much gold are we talking about? Between 1945 and 1985, the best available records show gold recoveries amounting to between 500,000 and 1 million tons! This is not even counting the loot that had already reached Japan. For further confirmation, please read the book called “Gold Warriors”, by Sterling & Peggy Seagrave.

The key co-ordinater and manager of the recovered loot was Nelson Rockefeller’s CIA. Much of the proceeds were deposited in various major Rockefeller banks, prime amongst them being Citibank. One of the key operators in this shadow world made a statement in 2000, that Citibank holds assets of more than $1 trillion (in a special account) then, part of the proceeds of the Black Eagle Trust. There is a very close link between the CIA and Citibank. Many former CIA heads have come to their job from Wall Street banks and law firms, and upon leaving the CIA, they go back to Wall Street, and the best are rewarded with a plum job at Citibank.

LARRY FINK & David Rockefeller Jnr at a MOMA reception

The overall manager of the Black Eagle Trust was John J McCloy, who at war’s end was given several top jobs by Nelson. He became the High Commissioner of Germany, head of the World Bank, and then became chairman of both the CFR and the Chase Manhattan Bank. He was, in short, the Prime Minister of the Rockefeller Empire. There is much, much more to write on this subject, and it will be released by March of 2021, and it’s going to be a 3-part series, called Yamashita’s Gold.

In 1988, one year after the 1987 stock-market crash, David Rockefeller decides to form another investment fund, and he put Larry Fink in charge. It was capitalized with funds from the Black Eagle Trust- hence the name BlackRock (the Rock being a shortened version of the family name!) Now, this is only one of many such investment funds that received money from the Black Eagle Trust. So, if Larry Fink speaks, remember, he is following the mandate of the Rockefeller family. Now you know who BlackRock belongs to.  To add to this,    BlackRock is the largest investor in fossil fuels on earth, playing so central a role in financing climate change that it is the subject of the “BlackRock’s Big Problem” campaign by environmental groups like the Sierra Club.  BlackRock is also a major investor in military weapons. One of BlackRock’s exchange traded funds (ETFS) is the “iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF”, a fund for investors looking to support companies like Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon.  Note here that BlackRock is the largest investor in oil companies and the Sierra Club, Northrop Grumman Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are all entities within the Rockefeller orbit. Let’s continue.

The Central Bankers

In recent months the world’s leading central bankers have come out declaring climate change, surprisingly, as a key part of the central bank “core responsibilities,” forgetting issues like inflation or currency stability. 

Perhaps the most outspoken and active central banker on climate change is outgoing Bank of England head Mike As noted above, already back in 2015, Davos Board member Carney, as chairman of the Bank for International Settlements’ Financial Stability Board (FSB), created the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), to advise “investors, lenders and insurance about climate related risks.”

What is becoming clearer is that the latest global push for dramatic climate action is more about justifying a major reorganization of the global economy, that to a far less efficient energy mode, implying a drastic lowering of global living standards. In 2010 the head of Working Group 3 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Dr Otmar Edenhofer, told an interviewer, “…one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore…” What better way to do it than to start with the world’s largest money controllers like BlackRock? 

We have had a quick look at the agenda of global warming aka climate change. In the next and final article on these series, we will discuss the financial aspects behind all of this, and, secondly, how these 2 families will use the Green Energy and the corona virus lockdown to bring about a one world government. A step-by-step process, and that’s why the theme of the 2010 Rockefeller Report called it “Lockstep”.

One thought on “LockDown – The Hidden Financial Agenda Part 2 (of a 3 Part Series)

  1. This is really a great serie tying every element together. The big picture is essential.

    Regarding the secret gold from WWII looted by Germany and Japan, there was an original investigation by David Guyatt on his website DeepBlackLies called “The Secret Gold Treaty”.

    He also claims Sterling Seagrave ripped off his materials for the book you mentionned in the article.

    I’m sure you already know this source but here it is in case off.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Posts by Month