1. America

When Israel was formed in 1948, the Rockefeller family were lukewarm, if not hostile to it. This state of affairs went on until the 1967 June war between Egypt and Egypt/Syria. Nasser was the leader of Egypt, and he was stating that – – – “why must oil policy be decided in New York, London and Paris?– – it’s about time that we, the Arabs, make ourselves the masters of our oil”. He had just signed his death warrant. Israel was tapped to “break Nasser into a 1,000 pieces”. With an easy and quick Israeli victory over Egypt and Syria, a strategic cooperation began between the US and Israel. In August 1971, the US cancelled the gold-dollar window. Which meant that foreign holders of dollars could no longer cash these for gold. The dollar collapsed by some 25 % plus over the next 2 years. The Rockefeller brothers decided on a radical action that would bring back the dollar to center stage. This would be accomplished if the dollar was tied to oil sales. And, this was the “big job “ that Israel would do for the Rockefeller Empire. This “big job” that Israel did for the Rockefeller Empire was its role in the October 1973 war. This entire war and its aftermath was scripted by Rockefeller sidekick Henry Kissinger. Israel wanted to attack first, but Kissinger stayed their hand, as he wanted the Arabs to strike the first move. And so it happened. The Rockefeller aim in this war was to bring the dollar back to center stage. By May 1975, the petro-dollar was born. Since that time, Israel has been designated as the Rockefeller Empire’s “attack dog”. Both the families have the same vision for the region. For the Rockefeller family, the aim is to balkanize the Middle East, and steal/control its oil resources. For this, they need an attack dog in the region. Israel suits that agenda very well for the Rockefellers. Israel will be hated while the US stands in the background. According to Biden, “if there were no Israel, we’d have to invent one”. For the Rothschild’s, they have a similar aim – to balkanize the region, place its people into a submissive mode ad expand the Greater Israel Project. Israel needs help in accomplishing this task, and that’s where the US comes in. The core of the U.S.-Israel relationship is the unparalleled amount of aid that Washington bestows upon its proxy. Israel is the top recipient of U.S. military aid, more than $300 billion (adjusted for inflation) from the United States since World War II. In addition, there has been direct financial aid has come from various Rothschild-linked entities and individuals amounting to some $140 billion.

This last conflict has cost the Washington some $30-40 billion. From Europe, one can add another $10-30 billion. And, still the West lost. Washington continues to provide Israel with $4 billion annually in addition to other arms deals and security benefits. (Some of the other top recipients of U.S. aid, such as Egypt and Jordan, receive large amounts in exchange for maintaining normalized relations with Israel). Israel and its supporters are hugely influential in Washington, commanding attention on both sides of the political aisle through different forms of direct and indirect ties. Many within the US government and others are saying that it’s past time for a fundamental reevaluation of the U.S.-Israel relationship. The special relationship does not benefit Washington and is endangering U.S. interests across the globe. They problem that both the families now face is that the deception built around this project has been exposed. The 2 year genocide, live-streamed on to our phones, has blown this narrative that London was pushing for 8 decades, after spending tens of billions. London took great pleasure in demonizing the Palestinians, Arabs and their faith Islam. Islamophobia is an invention of the Rothschild’s. Just as they invented communism, democracy, atheism, Protestantism and so on. The citizens of the West are now waking up from decades of brainwashing and realizing how badly they have been duped. And, they are upset, furious and angry. They want answers and are now scrutinizing everything that the corrupt politicians and media are spewing out. This has London very worried. The Gaza conflict was planned in 2020-during the Pandemic. The Boston Consulting Group-a Rockefeller entity-was tasked with the planning. When the conflict began in 2023, it was expected to last a fe months. It’s now more than 2 years, in which the West was defeated-, meaning they failed to accomplish their objectives.

On top of this is the unrelenting pressure from David Rockefeller jnr to “rein in the unruly child”. – meaning Israel. Israel as a proxy and attack dog was under US pressure to “get the job done quickly”, which Israel failed to accomplish. Finally, the US began to take over the war in a more direct fashion. Add to this the mandate from David Rockefeller jnr to Trump is to “end the war” in Gaza. Israel was proving reluctant to do so, as it could not face the humiliation of defeat. The immense pressure placed on Israel by the US resulted in the weak ceasefire that followed in October.

The Public Narrative in the Techtronic Era

In 1971, Zbigniew Brzezinski publish a book called “Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Techtronic Age“. The following are some of the key quotes/takeaways we get from this book.

___“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. ”
—–“In the technetronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.” —- “Most Americans are close to total ignorance about the world. They are ignorant. That is an unhealthy condition in a country in which foreign policy has to be endorsed by the people if it is to be pursued.
—-Persisting social crisis, the emergence of a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public confidence would be the steppingstones in the piecemeal transformation of the United States into a highly controlled society.” —“We have a large public that is very ignorant about public affairs and very susceptible to simplistic slogans by candidates who appear out of nowhere, have no track record, but mouth appealing slogans”
—“America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad.” One of the sectors the family is heavily involved in is tech. David Jnr’s uncle, Lawrence was the man who spearheaded the family’s push in tech, since 1945. The biggest tech companies in the US, Japan and South Korea are in the Rockefeller orbit. Such companies as IBM, Intel, Microsoft, HP, Google/Facebook (started with CIA money), NVidia, Samsung, TSMC, and others. The Rothschild family is not strong in tech. Three of the most advanced tech countries in the world (until 2016) are Germany, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. All these countries are in the US orbit. In fact, Germany, South Korea and Japan are under US military occupation. Today, tech has advanced to such a degree that the Rockefeller Empire is now in a position to monitor everyone on a 24/7 basis. The internet itself was built and promoted by the family, and its first customer was the Pentagon. With all this power, they still could not silence criticism of Israel and US foreign policy.

The second point regarding the above is the “dumbing down” of the Americans and Europeans, through lower quality education and low-grade entertainment. A dumbed down population is easy to manipulate through the media narrative. Both the above points- tech and the dumbed- down education has brainwashed the western public into believing some crazy things. Logic, rationality and common sense is lacking in most modern western citizens. Fortunately, for our case, social media came to the rescue. People see. People hear. They cannot unsee or unhear. And, they are mad.

The Eighth Front: Israel fights back over its falling image in the US

When anyone stands up to help the people of Gaza, they are also subjected to a smaller dose of the same punishment. The impunity with which the Israeli regime commits its war crimes throughout West Asia has proven every legal mechanism and international body faulty. The Israeli genocide in Gaza is the world’s first live-streamed genocide, a holocaust in which the global public watches on as a steady stream of shredded and beheaded children fills their social media feeds on a daily basis. This genocide, where everything from rape and starvation to the execution of medical teams and beheading of babies, has been ongoing for 18 months without any justice. When anyone stands up to help the people of Gaza, they are also subjected to a smaller dose of the same punishment. In Lebanon, Hezbollah tried to play a supporting role to the Palestinians, and for it, the Zionist regime murdered 4,000 people in their country, after detonating thousands of explosive pagers across the country in an act of terrorism.  On a daily basis, the Israelis attack the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. They violate the sanctity of the Muslim and Christian Holy Sites in occupied al-Quds, while ethnically cleansing the indigenous population of the city. For months, they have been denying Gaza all food and medical aid, while bragging about the suffering they are causing. And for 18 months, their whole society has openly uttered genocidal statements against Palestinians.

Now, across the West, if you dare organize a university protest or become too vocal about Israeli war crimes, you may be imprisoned, beaten, or deported. Your freedom of speech is being taken away from you if you stand up against this holocaust and the genocidal settler entity committing it. If there is a word to capture or describe how badly Israel’s public image is damaged, what would it be? Most certainly the word would be “disaster”! Some may argue that even metaphorically speaking, the Zionist regime has exhausted all efforts aimed to overcome its disastrous public relations. Every action – whether military, political or diplomatic – has led from disaster to disaster. Americans are changing their views on Israel. And, that is creating a huge headache for London and Paris. The most common question from one of the most heavily Jewish congressional districts in the country was some variation of, “What are you going to do about the starvation in Gaza?”

While there were some supporters of the current Israeli government in the audience, they were badly outnumbered by critics of Israel — and U.S. support for Israel. Israel has always received criticism from certain quarters of the globe. For most of this century, that did not matter. Israel’s allies in the West, other great powers, and even its Arab neighbors mostly tolerated Israel’s policies in the occupied territories. This gave Israel considerable latitude in how it dealt with Hamas. For most of this century, Israel and its allies have fought desperately to avoid any comparison with apartheid-era South Africa, recognizing that such an association would harm Israel’s standing in the world. For all its sins, however, the Afrikaner government was never accused of fomenting a genocide. The very fact that the discussion is taking place is a sign of a significant shift in political tectonics that should be worrisome both for Israelis and American supporters of Israel. As the humanitarian situation in Gaza has gone from very bad to war-crimes-tribunal-level bad, global and U.S. opinions have undeniably shifted on Israel. In a lot of ways the elite discontent over Israel’s actions in Gaza trails the growing public discontent Polls show that global public opinion on Israel has soured in recent years. With both progressive activists on the left and MAGA isolationists on the right railing about Israel’s bellicosity and culpability, it will be difficult for Israel to cajole Congress into offering further support. Once criticism of a country becomes bipartisan, the taboo against further criticism crumbles. This is not the first time Israel has faced broad-based U.S. criticism for its prosecution of the war in Gaza, but it might be the first time that its standard defense mechanisms are failing to register. The use of anti-Semitism as a pretext for stifling criticism of Israel has lost the power that it once had. In addition, the words – “you are a terrorist”, which was normally reserved for Arabs and Muslims, has been so freely bandied about- and hurled at peaceful protestors in the West, that many have now realized that this term , in reality, belongs to the accuser; as the saying goes, “an accusation is a confession”. What this means is that Zionists and their supporters have been quick to accuse their enemies of what the Zionists do. Now, the truth has emerged of who the real terrorists in the world are.

Since Hamas’s daring military raid on October 7^thagainst Israel, the world has watched as Israel carries out military actions in Gaza. During this period, images from this conflict have been shown on television, and especially importantly, for younger audiences to absorb at a high rate. As a result, we have seen the already weak support for Israel among young Americans plummet as the visuals of Palestinian suffering are played on daily. This weakening of American public approval for Israel has not occurred overnight, but has been building over a period of years. Israel’s image in the U.S. has been significantly damaged, with public opinion shifting to be largely more unfavorable toward Israel since the start of the 2023-2024 conflict in Gaza. This shift is particularly pronounced among Democrats and younger Americans, though negative views have risen across the board. 

History of the Christian Zionists aka Christian evangelists

For one thing, Israel’s key base of political support in the United States no longer rests on Jews but with the evangelical Christian base. A belief in the return of the Jews to the Holy Land has roots in the United States, which pre-date the establishment of Israel. Lobbying by these groups, to influence the Christians in the US in ways similar to Zionist ideology, dates back to at least the 19th century. Beginning in 1914, the involvement of Rothschild agent Brandeis and his brand of American Zionism made Jewish Zionism a force on the American scene for the first time; under his leadership it had increased ten-fold to about 200,000. As chair of the American Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs, Brandeis raised millions of dollars to relieve Jewish suffering in war-torn Europe, and from that time “became the financial center for the world Zionist movement.” The British additionally advanced the Zionist movement and gave it official legitimacy. They issued the Balfour Declaration in 1917. Zionist lobbying in the United States aided the creation of the State of Israel in 1947–48.The relationship between Israel and the U.S. government began with strong popular support for Israel and governmental reservations about the wisdom of creating a Jewish state; formal inter-government relations remained chilly until 1967. Prior to 1967, the federal government of the United States provided some aid but was generally neutral towards Israel. However, in each year between 1976 and 2004, Israel received the most direct foreign assistance from the U.S. of any nation, approximately 0.1% of the $3 trillion U.S. annual budget.

The Birth of Christian Zionism

In 1907, Victor Rothschild, along with the other senior members of the London Rothschild’s, the family knew that the Ottoman Empire was on its death throes. The family had already decided on a war to destroy Germany, Russia and the Ottomans. It would be able to wrest Palestine from the Ottomans and place it under their control. But, to make sure that the hated and despised Christian West would not come to the help of the Arabs over Palestine. But, how to convince the American Christians? Simple. Con them like how our ancestors did to the early and later followers of Jesus.(more on this in our article titled “The Talmudic Creeds vengeance on Humanity “ which will be out in the first week of January) Make them believe the Christians and the Jews are one, both follow the Bible, and that both should unite against the “barbarian Arabs”. And, so was born the Christian Zionists and Islamophobia. Two years later, the first edition of the Scofield Bible was published. Sales of the Reference Bible exceeded two million copies by the end of World War II. Largely through the influence of Scofield’s notes, many in the United States adopted a dispensational theology. The Scofield Bible significantly influenced the movement. Referring to Scofield’s interpretation of Genesis 12:3 (“I will bless them that bless thee and curse him that curses thee”), the founder of (CUFI), argued that “The man or nation that lifts a voice or hand against Israel invites the wrath of God.” Since it was first published in 1909, the Scofield Reference Bible has made uncompromising Zionists out of tens of millions of Americans. When John Hagee, the founder of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), said that “50 million evangelical bible-believing Christians unite with five million American Jews standing together on behalf of Israel,” it was the Scofield Bible that he was talking about.

Another Christian Zionist, Sizer concludes, “Christian Zionism’s particular reading of history and contemporary events…sets Israel and the Jewish people apart from other peoples in the Middle East…it justifies the endemic racism intrinsic to Zionism, exacerbates tensions between Jews and Palestinians and undermines attempts to find a peaceful resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, all because ‘the Bible tells them so.’”

SCOFIELD-a Rothschild agent

Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s club (the Lotus Club) in 1901. This was a very exclusive club, and Scofield would not have been admitted into this club on his own standing. That someone was the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. Untermeyer was employed by various Rothschild banks, companies and other Rothschild entities. Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the Zionist Movement.” Untermeyer used Scofield, a Kansas City lawyer with no formal training in theology, to inject Zionist ideas into American Protestantism. Untermeyer and other wealthy and influential Zionists whom he introduced to Scofield promoted and funded the latter’s career, including travel in Europe. Had the Scofield Bible never been published, American presidents influenced by Christian Zionism such as Truman, Johnson, Reagan and George W. Bush might have been less sympathetic to Israeli demands, and consequently more attentive to U.S. interests. Moreover, the American people could have been spared the pseudo-Christian rants of John Hagee, Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, not to mention the lucrative End Times Rapture “prophecy” peddled by Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHaye. But it is the people of the Middle East who have been most affected by an expansionist Israel , emboldened by the unswerving allegiance of Christian Zionists led to believe that Scofield’s words are God’s will. Not least among the many victims of the Scofield Bible are 5 million Palestinian refugees whose right to return is fervently opposed by America’s Zionized Christians. Thanks to their indoctrination by Scofield’s unholy book, they believe that Palestine belongs not to the Palestinians—many of whom are fellow Christians—but exclusively to “God’s chosen people.”  The results can be seen today with the US political elite- support for Israel is strong among American Christians of many denominations.

Israel Funds Summit For 1,000 US Pastors Overseen By Amb. Huckabee

A group of more than 1,000 American Christian Zionist pastors and influencers has spent a week in Israel on an all-expenses-paid trip that was funded by the Israeli Foreign Ministry. This was in early December. “This is the first time in history that the state of Israel has officially partnered with 1,000 strategic pastors to commission them as ambassadors to combat anti-Semitism and reach the youth of their generation,” Mike Evans, an evangelical pastor who helped organize the trip,  “Right now there’s an ideological war that Israel is losing, so they need the evangelicals, they need the Zionists to fight an ideological war,” Evans added. Christian Zionists like Evans believe that the modern state of Israel has the right to all of the land in historic Palestine, including the Israeli-occupied West Bank, based on the Bible, a view that has its roots in dispensationalism, a Christian theology developed in the US in the 19th century. The view runs counter to thousands of years of Christian tradition, as it’s rejected by the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and many Protestant denominations, yet it has significant influence on US foreign policy. While American evangelicals have always comprised a solid base of support for Israel, that support has been declining, part of an overall trend among Americans due to Israel’s brutal campaign in Gaza.

The Charlie Kirk Assassination

They even lost Charlie Kirk. A key part of pushing the Zionist narrative was to get American Christian evangelists with a wide following on social media. Charlie Kirk was one of those. But, by end June, Kirk was trying to distance himself from Israel. It has recently been confirmed that just 48 hours before his death by assassination, Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk had texted, “Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won’t cancel Tucker…. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the Israel cause.” Coincidence? Many are wondering. This alarmed London. So, a few days before his murder, Kirk was invited to a meeting in New York at the home of Bill Ackerman (a Rothschild front man) along with other Zionist billionaire agents. Kirk was pressured and threatened, but he did not bow down. Candace Owens claimed that Kirk had been pressured to soften criticism, that Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman (another Rothschild agent) orchestrated an  “intervention” in the exclusive retreat of the Hamptons, that Netanyahu himself had called Kirk to invite him to the Zionist entity, and that huge donations – totaling $150 million — were offered to Turning Point USA to keep Kirk on board.  This took place in early August,in the Hamptons, discuss support for Israel with influencers, including Charlie Kirk. Natasha Hausdorff of UK Lawyers for Israel was also present at the high-pressure “intervention” to bring Kirk into line. Hausdorff was screaming at Kirk. There were other Zionist players there, surrounding kirk and using various means to pressure him. Ackman denied the allegations, but multiple sources contacted by The Grayzone backed up and extended their initial reporting. Netanyahu could hardly deny having rung Kirk since he had tweeted about it on September 10th, the very day that Kirk was assassinated, stating that “I spoke to him only two weeks ago and invited him, Kirk was killed on September 10^th. Over 3 weeks of pressure and Israel folded. The ceasefire went into effect a month later.

Usually, when the Mossad kills someone, they deny it as a matter of policy, although everyone who is familiar with the modus operandi of the Mossad knows that the Mossad is responsible. Very unusually, Netanyahu –under pressure from Paris and London, was forced to make an announcement denying Israel had anything to do with this- not once BUT TWICE! Nobody believed him-although it was the truth! This murder proved extremely costly for Israel’s image. Coming on months of protests and talk show hosts such as Tucker Carlson, Candace Own and many others speaking up about Israel’s role and hold over US politicians, this assassination has turned many supporters of Israel against them. After Charlie Kirk’s warning on Israel’s “information war,” new deals with US firms show millions spent on influencers and AI to sway young audiences. Kirk also warned that relying on American surrogates to defend Israel would not be enough. The world he outlined is the one that now dominates the headlines, and it is the world the Israeli government is moving to address.

The Israeli government has faced scrutiny at home for failing to win the information war. A key part of this pressure was the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The huge outcry that followed hinted that Israel was behind this murder. The best part was that they were not responsible. Rather it was the CIA behind it. On the orders of Rockefeller family. The reason was to put Israel under pressure to agree to the US ceasefire terms.

Bondi Beach-a false flag op

With the huge global blowback on Israel’s image, the family became desperate. Another false flag operation was needed. This would generate some sympathy for the Zionists, and put Islam and the Muslims in a bad light. The ideal place would be to do this op in the US. There is two problems with this. There is an unwritten rule that Israel cannot do political assassinations in the US. Secondly, as we have shown, the Mossad was not involved in Kirk’s assassination. Finally, over the past 2 months, there has been an increase in US counter-intelligence against British Intelligence and the Mossad. With all of these precautions in place, it was decided it would be better in Australia. Add to the fact that Australia is 100 % under Rothschild control. And, so the false flag took place on Bondi Beach, during a Jewish religious celebration. This time, though, surprise! London never expected negative results from this. It was all against them. People are not fooled anymore as they have caught up with such playbooks from the CIA, Mossad and MI6. Increasingly isolated, “Israel” tries to convince Jewish Westerners that becoming a settler in Palestine will make them safer than staying home. The ferocity of the attempt to conflate anti-Semitism with opposition to genocide and apartheid is a measure of just how ineffective this tactic has now become. The only move still open to the Israeli regime’s propagandists is to petulantly demand political crackdowns on the right to protest and on freedom of expression, muzzling opposition to Zionism as “hate speech”. The shrieking and handwringing about anti-genocide protesters “causing” the “anti-Semitic” mass-shooting on Sunday is itself a testament to the changed world we now live in. Consent for “Israel’s” policies and impunity has collapsed everywhere.

In the heartland of the so-called “Free World”, the only tool left to Western governments is pure coercion via imprisonment and criminalization of speech. The phase of cultural boycotts is only about to begin. “Israel’s” participation in Eurovision in 2026 is less likely every week, and UEFA is faced with the choice of suspending “Israel’s” membership or having its tax-exempt status in Switzerland removed. These ultimately symbolic measures will come before the real costs of the Zionist regime’s global pariah status start to kick in. Global public opinion has shifted permanently. The era of “Israeli legitimacy” within the international state system is over, and it will never be recovered. With its cynical and infantile efforts to criminalize opposition in its patron states more likely to fail, Tel Aviv’s last hope to capitalize on the global blow-back to its actions is to try and induce, (if not provoke), mass Jewish immigration from Western states. That Palestine is statistically a far more dangerous place for Jews than their home countries is immaterial. What matters is that the regime will need all the additional settlers it can draw to delay the inevitable for as long as possible. As seen in the ongoing drama surrounding the conscription of the ultra-Orthodox, Israeli society is already straining under the costs of its own actions. Its deficit of 12,000 active soldiers will only continue to grow as the Haredim increase proportionally, and either continue to have their exemptions extended or abandon the Zionist project entirely in order to avoid military service. The flight of educated professionals to countries with viable life prospects will continue to hamstring the economy to an increasing degree as the global boycott sets in.

Against this backdrop, the Bondi Beach massacre has given the Israeli regime the obscene platform to assert that Jewish life in countries such as Australia, Britain, France, and the US is impossible and that the only real solution is their flight en masse to the safety of this isolated genocidal colony. Today’s reality is that most people, including Jews, can see right through this cynical ploy. Anti-Semitism, the real kind rather than the morally correct revulsion at the actions of a genocidal apartheid state, regrettably, very much exists in Australia, as it does in North America and throughout Europe. That doesn’t mean, even in the wake of an atrocity like Bondi, that any more than the most ideologically driven minority will seriously conclude that their life prospects will be better or more secure in a hyper-militarized garrison state, reviled and shunned by the world and condemned never to be accepted as legitimate by the peoples into whose region it has intruded. This is the predicted outcome of a desperate party. Desperation leads to mistakes.

Free America from AIPAC and the ADL,

Former Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz, whose nomination by Trump to become U.S. Attorney General was foiled by the Zionist lobby, revealed just how easily and crudely the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) captures the Congress. He described going to an AIPAC convention that his fundraiser and chief of staff ordered him to attend. Consider this in the context that, in the past two weeks, FBI Director Kash Patel has announced the severance of the longstanding ties between the Bureau and two private entities: The Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). One person who never bowed to AIPAC or the ADL (which have nothing to do with Judaism, but are foreign lobbyists for the British Empire and organized crime) was former U.S. presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche, who passed away in 2019. LaRouche was the target of never-ending smear campaigns and a judicial witch-hunt in which the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith coordinated with reporters from NBC News, the Washington Post, the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, as well as members of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, as well as intelligence operatives, who met at the Manhattan townhouse of weapons dealer and Wall Street investor John Train.

Why would such a high-powered group of spooks expend so much effort to slander and ultimately incarcerate Lyndon LaRouche and a few dozen of his closest associates? The reason they went to all that trouble then, and why they are going to all that trouble now, is that they are weak. They are losing. The old colonial world of empire—which is what actually controls Netanyahu, who is deployed like a hand grenade to blow up the crossroads of Eurasia—is at its end. Every day more American politicians are breaking from AIPAC, and there are many federal candidates who now make it a point of pride to not accept one cent from that unregistered foreign lobbying group.

However, the most powerful thing that Americans could do now to liberate our government from the snares of the billionaire British Empire lobby, which stands behind AIPAC,. Some of them have also been involved in the Russiagate hoax which U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is working to rectify now. The litmus test for whether a politician is truly interested in representing the people who elect them to power is becoming their stance on Palestine, more specifically, Gaza. As American public opinion continues to shift against Israel, the US political landscape is also undergoing a dramatic transformation. AIPAC, once viewed as an asset to aid in election races, is now becoming a liability, giving birth to a new generation of politicians who are demonstrating their sincerity through a refusal to be bought by the Israel Lobby.

While New York Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has perhaps received the most attention for his pro-Palestinian stances, he is in no way alone. In fact, he is joined by countless others who use their anti-genocide stances as a means of connecting with their voter bases. Refusing to take AIPAC money is rapidly becoming a prerequisite in order to be viewed as authentic, and it drives belief amongst the public that any given candidate will actually work to achieve key campaign promises. In other words, AIPAC equals corruption, and being pro-Palestinian equates to authenticity. Harnessing the energy of the shift, the likes of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Rep. Thomas Massie, and Rep. Matt Gaetz have all explicitly come out in opposition to AIPAC. Their messaging around the issue is to assert that they are “America First”, as opposed to their Republican colleagues, whom they accuse of being “Israel First”. These representatives align themselves with popular conservative commentators like Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson, amongst others, who also carry the same rhetoric. Ultimately, the idea of America First transcend partisan lines. The idea of prioritizing Americans above the interests of Israel has long been taboo, yet we saw this collapse during the Democratic primary campaign for the Mayor of New York.

It is important to note that new projects, like AIPAC Tracker, are also now promoting candidates who refuse to take funding from the Israel Lobby and have set up a page whereby citizens can donate to these anti-AIPAC politicians. AIPAC Tracker has played a particularly important role in educating the public, through graphics, showing how much the Israel Lobby has given to individual politicians. For example, earlier this month, AIPAC appeared to be experiencing an existential crisis following an announcement from prominent lawmaker, Seth Moulton, who declared he would not receive funds from the Lobby group and would even be returning their contributions. For such a right-leaning Democrat, on foreign affairs, to be publicly disavowing AIPAC, it signaled the toxicity of its brand more than anything. The more Israel interferes in American domestic affairs, demands free speech crackdowns, unconstitutional legislation, billions in taxpayer dollars to fund their wars of aggression, unlawful deportations of Israel critics and drags the US into more conflict overseas, the more the American opposition to the Israel Lobby grows. AIPAC is now bribing more discretely. Social media activists are not letting these tactics slip and are actively pointing out what they claim to be deceptive tactics, only fuelling more anger at the Lobby, in general. Yet, such tactics appear to prove desperation on AIPAC’s behalf, especially amidst growing calls for them to register as a foreign agent. The rise of Zohran Mamdani is reshaping Israeli-Palestinian politics within the party. He won the mayoral primary in New York despite a long record of skepticism about Israel. Mamdani’s victory has emboldened progressives, who might have backtracked from demanding candidates take Israel-skeptical positions if those proved electorally damaging. If a candidate like that can win a Democratic primary in New York without bowing to the pro-Israel side, it’s likely that such a candidate can win a primary anywhere. AIPAC, long regarded as one of the most influential pressure groups, has spent tens of millions of dollars targeting candidates critical of Israel.

The shift represents a deeper unravelling of what has long been called “Brand Israel” — the carefully cultivated image of a liberal democracy defending itself against extremism. That narrative has collapsed under the weight of the Gaza genocide. As its military bombs Gaza, despite agreeing to a ceasefire, Tel Aviv launches a parallel online offensive aimed at silencing resistance narratives, manipulating global perceptions, and re-engineering the digital memory of its war crimes. Netanyahu has described this as “the 8^th front: the battle for the truth.” Its aim is to refute accusations of genocide and deliberate famine linked to Israel’s two-year-long war on the strip, with social media and artificial intelligence (AI) programs serving as the most important battlegrounds on this front. Following Netanyahu’s meeting in New York on Friday with a group of pro-Israel influencers, we learn that Israel is likely paying them a whopping $7,000 per pro-Israel social-media post in a desperate drive to bolster plummeting support of Israel among America’s young conservatives. Netanyahu candid public statements to influencers raised eyebrows, as they laid bare Israel’s drive to control social media discourse in the United States in a bid to shore up American support. “We’re going to have to use the tools of battle,” said Netanyahu. “Weapons change over time…the most important ones are in social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is…TikTok.

In the wake of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October 2023, Israel’s so-called “ Digital Iron Dome “was activated to intercept digital content just as its military dome intercepts missiles. But instead of shrapnel, the targets are ideas – posts, images, videos – that expose Israel’s atrocities in the besieged enclave. This digital dome operates on two main layers. First is the volunteer-driven reporting system: a nationwide campaign in which users flood social media platforms with mass complaints against content deemed unfavorable to Israel. A hybrid of AI and human reviewers rapidly classifies flagged posts, then pushes takedown requests to platforms like Meta, TikTok, and X. The goal is speed – to kill the narrative before it spreads. TikTok alone deleted 3.1 million videos and cut off 140,000 live streams in the first six months of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The Israeli Attorney General’s Cyber Unit filed nearly 9,500 takedown requests during the same period. The second layer is algorithmic warfare: AI systems scan over 200,000 websites to identify dissenting narratives, then bombard exposed users with paid pro-Israel content in real time. Using ad campaigns that mimic the look and timing of organic posts, Israel floods timelines with a manufactured counter-narrative. This dual strategy aims to overwhelm and erase. The first suppresses the spread of resistance voices. The second replaces them with state-approved fabrications.

Part 2 to follow.