A global pandemic. A global lockdown. Economies screech to a halt. Tens of millions become unemployed – many never to become employed again.  National governments racing towards bankruptcy as they borrow money to stave off an even greater social calamity.

 Social engineers, working for various arms of the Rockefeller Empire are busy designing new ways to re-configure society- in all its formats- from work, education, entertainment to social and religious lifestyles. Welcome to the dawn of the New World Order. We are not as yet there yet, but we are on the door-step, and with just the right push, we are in the New World Order.  And the Rockefeller Empire’s social engineers are plotting, planning, and implementing these steps. And once enacted, there is no going back.

The Covid 19 pandemic was a deliberate act of bio-terror, and thus an act of war; the target – governments and its citizens. But, there is another over-riding agenda behind this. For more details on the economic and financial implications, please read the author’s previous article called “Post Lockdown” – The Rockefeller Game – Plan, https://behindthenews.co.za/post-lockdown-the-rockefeller-game-plan-part-1-of-a-2-part-series/. Part 2 follows and is dated 10 May 2020.

This article will focus on the geopolitical opportunities that the US will take advantage of. We will break up the globe into different sections, and discuss them separately. In this manner, the variety of current issues around the globe will be more clearly understood, as events unfold, as per the Rockefeller Empire’s geopolitical agenda. The Empire is running out of time as its economic rivals become stronger- financially and militarily. This Lockdown was in the works, and it was set to be rolled out for some time in the near future. It was rushed out earlier than planned due to certain events and actions emanating from the British (Rothschild Network), and as well as Chinese intransigence.

The British Empire hijacked the Green Agenda from New York and established a co-ordinated move by the British Empire’s financial and economic networks of power, such as central banks, oil companies, and other large global companies within the Rothschild orbit. The Green Agenda was always, and still is, New York’s portfolio. In March of 2019, London jumped on board the Green Agenda, at a ferocious speed. Since New York unleashed this virus, London has muted its involvement in the Green Agenda. The British/Rothschild Empire is now on the defensive on multiple fronts. And, it’s a given, that they will soon cave in to Washington, within a few weeks.

Now, let us discuss the plans for the US which New York is rolling out, to the American people. When a country that loudly proclaims democracy and freedom of speech, while at the same time, it conducts imperial wars around the globe, then the very foundation of democracy and freedom of speech has to be muzzled. The first step taken towards this was in the period just after 9-11. The Patriot Act was passed in Congress. This was effective in muzzling democracy, freedom of speech and dissent. It was then safe for the US to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, and to destabilize many other countries.

Between 2001 and 2020, America’s geopolitical and economic rivals in Eurasia have become stronger. This posed a serious threat to America’s position as the globe’s dominant power. The world slowly began shifting from a unipolar system to a multi-polar system. This threatened America’s status as the global superpower. It was time to go on the offensive. The PROBLEM was the opposition that would emerge firstly from the American people, and then people around the world. In order to go on the offensive, the American people have to be muzzled even more. That was the SOLUTION. The answer was to cause an increasing violent social order through riots, curtailing law enforcement powers, and increasing the population’s FEAR FACTOR. This was the REACTION. In other words, PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION. We will find in the days coming ahead that the US Congress will pass more laws that will slowly turn the US into a military dictatorship – but with a civilian face. The way will now be cleared for the US to really go on the offensive in eliminating its economic and geopolitical rivals

Do note that, currently, in the world, there are five major centers of power, and these are London (representing the Rothschild Empire), New York (representing the Rockefeller Empire), Moscow (run by a nationalist faction, whose face is Putin), Beijing (run by the nationalist faction whose face is Xi Jinping), and Riyadh (representing oil and Islamic power).  All major decisions affecting global power politics emanate from one of these 5 power centers. The rest of the nations in the world are tied into, or are within the orbit, of one or more of these powers. .

 Now, that we have this background, let us now focus on the other regions of the world, starting first with Latin America.

US Domination of Latin America: Nicaragua, Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba

We look at the US’ latest efforts in Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Bolivia to undermine their independence and force them to serve the interests of the US government and transnational corporations.

Nicaragua: USAID Multi-Year Destabilization Plan Exposed

A US Agency for International Development (USAID) document describes covert plans to overthrow the democratically-elected Nicaraguan government in the next two years. USAID seeks to hire mercenaries “to take charge of the plan . . . to disrupt public order and carry out other [violent] actions before, during, and/or after the 2021 elections.”

The real goal is domination so US transnational corporations can profit  by putting in place a neoliberal economy to privatize public services, cut social services, and purge all traces of the Sandinistas. USAID also plans to “reestablish” the police and military to enforce their rule. Another goal is to stop Nicaragua from being the “threat of a good example” for its economic growth, reduction of inequality, poverty, illiteracy and crime.

Venezuela: Bipartisan Failed Regime Change

Ever since the 1998 election of Hugo Chavez, successive US administrations have tried and failed to dominate Venezuela. These events come after two major embarrassments for the US in Venezuela. Operation Gideon, an attempt by mercenaries to invade Venezuela was foiled on May 4, leading to their arrests and the arrests of their co-conspirators. The State Department abandoned the mercenaries. The second defeat was Iran and Venezuela working together to deliver oil and equipment for Venezuelan refineries. Five Iranian oil tankers passed by the largest US armada in the Caribbean since the invasion of Panama. Southcom has been repeatedly sending warships into Venezuelan waters. The solidarity of Iran and Venezuela overcame the naval blockade, undermined US sanctions, and sent a shudder through the US by showing other nations they can defy the United States.

Venezuela has a strong history of struggle against imperialism but the US economic war is costing their economy hundreds of billions of dollars and leading to the premature death of Venezuelans. In addition, the United Kingdom is refusing to release more than a billion dollars of Venezuelan gold held in the Bank of England that was to be used for food and medicine. The UK court ruled against Venezuela but they are appealing the decision.

Bolivia: US Dictator Fears Democratic Vote

On November 12 2019, a US-backed coup in Bolivia removed President Evo Morales who had just won re-election. The self-proclaimed President Jeanine Añez, a right-wing Christian, leads a de facto government involved in massacres, persecution and imprisonment of political leaders. It is destroying the social and economic model and achievements of the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS Party) led by Morales.

The OAS played a crucial role in the coup. Many have called this a lithium coup because the element is plentiful in Bolivia and critical for batteries. This was made evident when Elon Musk, the head of Tesla, said on Twitter “We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” Tesla would benefit from cheap and plentiful lithium for electric car batteries. Evo Morales said in a recent interview: “The United States is trying to make Latin America its backyard forever. We know about the hard resistance of the peoples of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. The struggle of our peoples is very important. The United States wants to divide us in order to plunder our natural resources. The people no longer accept domination and plunder. The United States is in decline, and yet it lashes out.”

Cuba

In the late 1950s, the Rockefeller family found that the American people were “taking the communist threat” lightly. The FEAR OF COMMUNISM had to be increased within the people. Thus, by late 1959, after a meeting at the CFR in New York City, David Rockefeller met with Fidel Castro, and ‘came to an understanding’. Within a short time, the Cuban dictator was ousted in a CIA coup, and Castro took over Cuba. Castro espoused the communist doctrine. A big ‘hue-and-cry’ ensued in the American media-thus, galvanizing American opinion against Castro and communism. The groundwork was laid for the family to commit US forces into fighting a “communist threat” in far-away Vietnam.

During the Kennedy administration, an invasion of Cuba was deliberately sabotaged by the CIA. This ensured that Castro remained in power in Cuba – and this would serve to keep the communist threat alive for the American people.

 Cuba lost its financial support from Moscow, when the Soviet Union imploded in 1991.

 Then, in 2010, huge oil discoveries were made off shore Cuba. At around the same time, the US was busy destabilizing Venezuela. Cuba was getting oil at a discount from Venezuela, and this aid kept the Cuban economy chugging along. Now, with the Rockefeller’s Fortress America plan in full swing, under the Trump administration, it was time to remove the influence of Castro and socialism in Cuba. The most effective way of doing this would be for Venezuela to cut-off oil supplies to Cuba.

Furthermore, Russia’s main oil company Rosneft, has signed agreements with Cuba to develop its oil reserves. Cuba has military facilities built by the Soviet Union during the Cold War years. America’s fear is that Russia could station fighter jets and interceptor bombers to interdict shipping from Latin America to the US. Russia has to be denied the use of such facilities, as well as the cancellation of the oil deal with Russia.

The key to achieve all of these would be to regime change Venezuela. Were this to happen, then a new Venezuelan government that is pro-America, would cut off aid to both Cuba and Nicaragua, thus crippling their economies. This would make it easier for the CIA to implement regime-change, and re-align both these countries to the US orbit.

With this, America’s Fortress America plan would be complete.  Latin America would be back in New York’s fold. Its resources would then be denied to America’s economic rivals, thus adding greater pressure on other areas of the globe, resulting in increased competition and hostilities between America’s economic rivals.

 For New York and the Rockefeller Empire, the way would now be open to “blow-up” the Middle East; this would result in a shortage of oil supplies on the market. Without guaranteed oil supplies at a reasonable price, America’s economic rivals would witness their economies screeching to a halt.

The Covid 19 biowarfare agenda has had a devastating impact on most countries in Latin America. The region has plunged into severe economic and financial troubles, which have helped to weaken governments, and have made them more susceptible to the ‘advice and warnings’ from Wall Street. This Covid 19 warfare has made New York’s task much easier to implement its geopolitical agenda for the continent.

We now swing our attention to Europe.

Europe

On behalf of The Two families (TTF), World War II was orchestrated by the circles of the City of London and of Wall Street to maneuver two great obstacles—Russia and Germany—to wage a war to the death against each other, in order that those Two Families (TF) could reorganize the world geopolitical chess board to their advantage. It largely succeeded, but for the small detail that after 1945, Wall Street and the Rockefeller brothers were determined that England play the junior partner to Washington. London and Washington then entered the period of their global domination known as the Cold War.

That Anglo-American global condominium ended, by design, in 1989 with the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the disintegration of the Soviet Union by 1991.

Around this time, with the onset of the Bill Clinton presidency in 1992, the next phase– financial and industrial globalization– was inaugurated. With that, began the hollowing out of the industrial base of not only the United States, but also of Germany and the EU. The cheap labor outsourcing enabled by the new WTO drove wages down and destroyed one industry after the next in the industrial West after the 1990s. It was a necessary step on the path to what G.H.W. Bush in 1990 called the New World Order. The next step would be destruction of national sovereignty everywhere.

Between 1918 and 1945, a fierce competition was unleashed between London (and the Rothschild Empire), which was trying very hard to hold onto its influence over Europe, while New York (and the Rockefeller Empire), were trying to increase its influence and power over Europe. By the end of the war, in 1945, America was the dominant power in Europe. Between 1945 and 1999, the US was successful in neutralizing Europe as a competitive threat to Wall Street. Between the formation of the Common Market, NATO, and finally the Euro in 1999, The Rockefeller family was assured of no threats to its domination of Europe.

In September 2000, the French Rothschilds persuaded Iraq’s Saddam Hussein to market his country’s oil in euros instead of the dollar-the enemy currency. This announcement heralded the death warrant for Saddam Hussein, and as well as the destruction of Iraq. New York saw this move by Europe (and the Rothschilds) as a challenge to their power. A vital point to note here is that the Rothschilds deliberately did this, knowing full well that this act would result in the Rockefeller Empire putting Saddam Hussein in the cross-hairs of the pentagon. From the Rothschild point of view, Iraq posed a serious military threat to Israel on its eastern borders. It was time to crush Iraq “once and for all”, by letting the Americans do the dirty work for the Rothschilds. And so it happened.

 David Rockefeller KNEW that the Rothschilds had suckered the US into a military conflict in Iraq – all to the geopolitical benefit of Israel. But, if the Rothschilds used this as a means to destroy Iraq, at a huge cost to America, then David Rockefeller had another plan that would cripple Europe, both financially and through its energy imports.

After the US invaded Iraq in 2003, a diabolical plan was rolled out by Wall Street to cripple the Rothschild’s European banking system, which revealed itself in the 2008 financial crash. This had a devastating impact on Europe Inc.; its banks, its global companies, as well as the financial state of all EU governments. In short, they were weakened to such an extent, that 12 years later, they are still in the “ICU’.

To further add pressure on the EU, their oil supplies were threatened when the CIA unleashed the Arab Spring in 2010. The aim was to disrupt Europe’s oil supply lines from Libya, Algeria and the Middle East. This shock to Europe is not as yet over. While the Arab Spring was in full bloom, the “Gas Wars” was playing out in the background.

This was a battle between Rockefeller oil companies and Russia, as to who would dominate and control Europe’s energy supplies, of which natural gas was destined to play an ever bigger role in Europe’s energy mix. For the full story on this, please read the articles called “The Gas Wars “, part one dated 25 June 2016 :- https://behindthenews.co.za/the-gas-wars-part-1-of-a-3-part-series/. Part 2 and 3 are dated 10 July 2016 and 25 July 2016 respectively.

Then came massive penalties imposed on EU companies for dealing with Russia, Iran and China – from VW to Total; to a range of banks (mainly the Rothschild’s Alpha Group of banks). And these fines and penalties were imposed by the US Treasury dept. And finally, the current battle between Russia and the US over the construction of Nord Stream 2, a gas pipeline from Russia into Germany.

Since it is the Rockefeller wish to dominate energy supplies to Europe, by exporting more oil and gas to Europe at a higher price than what Russia charges; Europe, and particular, Germany, is being squeezed. The tensions this has generated within Europe has pushed German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and French President Macron (who was ordered to leave his post at the Rothschild bank to take up the  post of the French Presidency) to speak up about forming an  EU army, independent of NATO. These leaders don’t have the power to bring this about, so wishful thinking on their part will not make it so.  And, the Americans won’t allow it.

 The unleashing of the Covid 19 biowarfare virus has also crippled Europe in more ways than one. Its economy was already faltering in 2019. More than 12 % of the EU economy comes from tourism – which the pandemic has killed off. Its banks are classified as “zombie banks”. Its companies are all in the red. And millions of jobs have been eliminated, for good. The possibility of Europe regaining its former stature is over.

EU governments have exhausted their finances trying to prop up the banks of Europe. With the advent of Covid 19, EU governments are so much in the red, that saying they are broke, is being polite. They ARE BEYOND BROKE.

All in all, the EU is on its last legs. Many governments want to break free of this Rothschild construct, and America is egging them on.  At first, a united EU was a good thing, from New York’s viewpoint. But, with the formation of the EU, especially since 2003, the EU has been taking decisions independent of New York, or at odds with New York. Thus, the decision to “break-up” the EU. In this event, New York will find it easier to manipulate individual countries, rather than dealing with one solid bloc. The age-old adage applies here: – “divided, we rule”.

Over the coming months, it will not surprise the readers of this site to see an increasingly hostile inter-action between EU and the US. Having read this, you can guess at the ultimate geopolitical aim of the Americans. 

As it stands, NATO countries are once again reaching an ‘eye-ball to eye-ball’ situation. This is deeply related to the crisis within NATO whereby the main trans-Atlantic powers, the US and EU, have grown considerably distant from each other. In fact, this has happened to the extent of pursuing different, even conflicting, policies on as crucial issues as Iran, China’s future role in Europe and Europe’s ‘energy-relations’ with Russia. The US-EU dispute over contribution to the NATO budget has further exacerbated the situation, leading France’s Macron to declare NATO a ‘brain-dead’ organisation.

Turkey

Increasing confrontation between France and Turkey will only strengthen Macron’s position. Apart from the fact that both Turkey and France are opposing different sides in Libya, France’s decision to challenge Turkey in the Mediterranean has a lot to do with the issue of pipelines from Israel to Cyprus and Greece – this is gas from Israel’s off-shore Leviathan and nearby gas fields.  Do note that the French branch of the Rothschilds has the energy portfolio for the family.  It was a French Rothschild – Edmond – who was the key instigator, financier and supporter of the Jewish movement back to Israel. Zionism was formed in Edmond Rothschild’s home in September 1882! Since Turkey is opposing this gas pipeline from Israel to Cyprus, thus, we find France in opposition to Turkey’s moves in the Mediterranean. Everything else is just window dressing.

It is important to note that the measures have been taken by the EU, not the NATO itself. While France has criticised and took steps to counter Turkey, US response has mostly been numb, leaving Europe to deal with its own mess. And the greater a mess Europe finds itself in, then it makes the job of the US that much easier in breaking up Europe, and weakening it beyond a point of irrelevance. The US position is in turn explained by ‘the isolation’ Trump has faced in Europe.  Growing distance between the US and the EU is one crucial reason why the US has no allies against China, Russia and Iran.

Accordingly, if the US has no European allies against China, Russia or Iran, NATO’s European members do not have US support against Turkey. Although the US-Turkey relations have not been particularly good in the wake of Turkey’s purchase of Russian S-400 system and a subsequent US decision to exclude Turkey from F-35 programme, the two countries have already started to rediscover their love for each other, with Turkey pitching to the US ideas of developing an alternative global supply chain route to counter China. The US will do its best to keep Turkey on its side as Turkey is VERY PIVOTAL in the geopolitical space of Eurasia. It has the potential to curb Russia’s Mediterranean ambitions – to the advantage of the US. Turkey is also in the position of exerting control  over the Syrian energy corridor- transporting oil and gas from the Persian gulf countries, into Syria, and then to markets in Europe. So, Turkey is a vital player on the Eurasian chessboard- thus, the US will do its best to support Turkey.

That Turkey-US relations are potentially normalising and that the US, despite the fact that Turkey-Cyprus dispute has already turned into a regional struggle for resources, has so far refused to insert itself in the conflict shows that not only is NATO from an ‘alliance’ but that the cleavages are increasingly becoming big enough to render the alliance a paper organisation only. Do note that NATO is an American entity, while the EU is a Rothschild entity. Thus, from the Rockefeller point, the EU has to be broken up, while NATO has to be strengthened.

The US aim is to have a Europe weak, divided and reliant on the US for its security and energy needs. A compliant Europe will not pose a competitive threat to the Rockefeller Empire.

China

If we step back from the details of daily headlines around the world and try to make sense of larger patterns, the dominant dynamic defining world geopolitics in the past three years or more is the appearance of a genuine irregular conflict between the two most formidable powers on the planet— China and the United States. Increasingly it’s beginning to look as if some very dark global networks are orchestrating what looks to be an updated rerun of their 1939-1945 World War. Only this time the stakes are total, and aim at the creation of a universal global totalitarian system, what David Rockefeller once called a “one world government.” The Two Families periodically use war to gain major policy shifts.

For the Rockefeller Family, who owe no allegiance to nations, only to their power which is across borders, the birth of the World Trade Organization and their bringing China in as a full member in 2001 was intended as the key next step. At that point the Rockefeller Family  facilitated in China the greatest industrial growth by any nation in history, possibly excepting Germany from 1871-1914 and USA after 1866. WTO membership allowed Western multinationals from Apple to Nike to KFC to Ford and VW to pour billions into China to make their products at dirt-cheap wage levels for re-export to the West.

One of the great mysteries of that China growth is the fact that China was allowed to become the “workshop of the world” after 2001, first in lower-skill industries such as textiles or toys, later in pharmaceuticals and most recently in electronics assembly and production. The mystery clears up when we look at the idea that the Rockefellers and their financial houses, using China, want to weaken strong industrial powers, to push their global agenda, in terms of lowering labor and production costs. Brzezinski often wrote that the nation state was to be eliminated, as did his patron, David Rockefeller. It is indeed frustrating to deal with 193 world leaders, instead of ONE world leader.

By the onset of the Presidency of Xi Jinping in 2012, China was an economic colossus second in weight only to the United States. Clearly this could never have happened–not under the eye of the British Rothschilds who launched the Opium Wars after 1840 to bring China to heel and open their economy to Western financial looting–unless the Anglo-Americans had wanted it.

The same British-owned bank involved in the China opium trade, Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank (HSBC), today is the largest non-Chinese bank in Hong Kong. HSBC has become well-connected to China. China needed access to Western money and HSBC and other select banks such as JP MorganChase, Goldman Sachs were only too happy to assist.

“Socialism with Xi Jinping Characteristics…”

All until 2012 when Xi took charge of the CCP in Beijing, China seemed to be willing to be a globalist “team player,” though with “Chinese characteristics.”  But Xi began to pursue a “China First” policy that went against US geopolitical interests. However, in 2015 after little more than two years in office, Xi Jinping endorsed a comprehensive national industrial strategy, Made in China: 2025. China 2025 replaced an earlier Western globalist document that had been formulated with the World Bank and the USA, the China 2030 report under Robert Zoellick. That shift to a China strategy for global tech domination  triggered a decision by the Rockefeller Empire (or New York) that China could no longer be relied on to play by the rules of the globalists, but rather that Xi was determined to make China the global leader in advanced industrial, AI and bio-technologies. A resurgent China nationalist global hegemony was not the idea of the Rockefeller Empire.

China:2025 combined with Xi’s strong advocacy of the Belt Road Initiative for global infrastructure linking China by land and sea to all Eurasia and beyond, likely suggested to the Rockefeller Empire, that,  the only solution to the prospect of their losing their power to a China global hegemon would ultimately be war, a war that would destroy  China. This is my conclusion and there is much to suggest this is now taking place.

Tit for Tat

If so, it will most likely be far different from the military contest of World War II. The USA and most of the Western industrial economies have “conveniently” imposed the worst economic depression since the 1930’s as a bizarre response to an alleged virus originating in Wuhan and spreading to the world. Despite the fact that the death toll, even with vastly inflated statistics, is at the level of a severe annual influenza, the insistence of politicians and the corrupt WHO to impose draconian lockdown and economic disruption has crippled the remaining industrial base in the US and most of the EU.

The eruption of well-organized riots and vandalism under the banner of racial protests across the USA has brought America’s cities to a state in many cases of war zones resembling the cities of Iraq.  In this context, anti-Washington rhetoric from Beijing has taken on a sharp tone in their use of so-called “Wolf Diplomacy.”

Now after Washington closed the China Consulate in Houston and China the US Consulate in Chengdu, both sides have stepped up rhetoric. High tech companies are being banned in the US, military displays of force from the US in the South China Sea and waters near Taiwan are increasing tensions and rhetoric on both sides. The White House accuses the WHO of being an agent of Beijing, while China accuses the US of deliberately creating a deadly virus and bringing it to Wuhan. Chinese state media supports the explosion of violent protests across America under the banner of Black Lives Matter. Step-wise events are escalating dramatically.

“Unrestricted Warfare”

Under these conditions, what kind of escalation is likely? In 1999 two colonels in the China PLA, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, published a book with the PLA Press titled Unrestricted Warfare. Qiao Liang was promoted to Major General in the PLA Air Force and became deputy secretary-general of the Council for National Security Policy Studies. The two updated their work in 2016. It gives a window on high-level China military strategy.

Reviewing published US military doctrine in the aftermath of the 1991 US Operation Desert Storm war against Iraq, the Chinese authors point out what they see as US over-dependence on brute military force and conventional military doctrine. They claim, “military threats are already often no longer the major factors affecting national security…these traditional factors are increasingly becoming more intertwined with grabbing resources, contending for markets, controlling capital, trade sanctions, and other economic factors, to the extent that they are even becoming secondary to these factors. They comprise a new pattern which threatens the political, economic and military security of a nation or nations… The two authors define the new form of warfare as, “encompassing the political, economic, diplomatic, cultural, and psychological spheres, in addition to the land, sea, air, space, and electronics spheres.”

They suggest China could use hacking into websites, targeting financial institutions, terrorism, using the media, and conducting urban warfare among the methods proposed. Recent revelations that Chinese entities pay millions in ad revenues to the New York Times and other mainstream USA media to voice China-positive views is one example. Similarly, maneuvering a Chinese national to head the US’ largest public pension fund, CalPERS, which poured billions into risky China stocks, or persuading the New York Stock Exchange to list dozens of China companies without requiring adherence to US accounting transparency increase US financial vulnerability are others.

This all suggests the form that a war between China and the US could take. It can be termed asymmetrical warfare or unrestricted war, where nothing that disrupts the enemy is off limits. Qiao has that, “the first rule of unrestricted warfare is that there are no rules, with nothing forbidden.” There are no Geneva Conventions.

The two Beijing authors add this irregular warfare could include assaults on the political security, economic security, cultural security, and information security of the nation. The dependence of the US economy on China supply chains for everything from basic antibiotics to militarily-vital rare earth minerals is but one domain of vulnerability.

On its side, China is vulnerable to trade sanctions, financial disruption, bioterror attacks and oil embargoes to name a few. Some have suggested the recent locust plague and African Swine Fever devastation to China’s core food supplies, was not merely an act of nature. If not, then we are likely deep into an undeclared form of US-China unrestricted warfare. There are rumours (in the “shadow world “ of geopolitics )that the recent extreme floods along the China Yangtze River that threaten the giant Three Gorges Dam and have flooded Wuhan and other major China cities and devastated millions of acres of key cropland was not entirely seasonal. Rather, that HAARP was used.

A full unrestricted war of China and the USA would be more than a tragedy. It could be the end of civilization as we know it

China is calling Trump’s bluff. China is quietly reorienting herself towards the ASEAN countries plus Japan (yes, Japan!) and South Korea, where trade already today accounts for about 15% of all China’s trade and is expected to double in the next five years.

Despite the lockdown and the disruption of trade, China’s overall exports recovered with a 3.2% increase in April (in relation to April 2019). This overall performance in China exports was nonetheless accompanied by a dramatic decline in US-China trade.

Meanwhile, China, with her philosophy of endless creation would continue forging ahead unstoppably with her mammoth socioeconomic development plan of the 21^st Century, the Belt and Road Initiative, connecting and bridging the world with infrastructure for land and maritime transport, with joint research and industrial projects, cultural exchanges – and not least, multinational trade with “win-win” characteristics, equality for all partners – towards a multi-polar world, towards a world with a common future for mankind.

Today already more than 120 countries are associated with BRI – and the field is wide open for others to join – and to defy, unmask and unplug The Great Reset of the West.

In short, China has become an unstoppable force in the world today. If left unchecked, China will become even more powerful in the coming years, and this increasingly powerful nation will be an obstacle to the continued domination of the globe by the US. Thus, in 2012, in order to forestall this looming threat, the Obama administration announced its “pivot to China “policy. To understand the background of the “shadow war” between the US and China, please read our 2 part article, called “CHINA: THE EMERGING GLOBAL GIANT”. Here.

Russia

Spread over 11 time zones, and extending from Europe to Asia, Russia is the largest country on earth. It also happens to be the richest country in terms of natural resources. From crude oil to natural gas, from base metals to coal, from gold, diamonds and platinum to nickel and a long list of practically every natural resource- Russia has it in over- abundance. It also has vast forests which can produce and a booming agricultural sector.

 A former lady Secretary of State- either Hillary Clinton or Madelaine Allbright- said that God should not have given Siberia to Russia. The West is envious of Russia’s natural bounty, and has been trying to get their hands on it, since the past 125 years. We shall do an article (next year) detailing the inter-action between the Rockefeller Empire and Russia from 1885 till now- a truly fascinating piece of hidden history, and titled  “ Russia & the Rockefeller Empire “

 All underground resources belonged to the Czar of Russia, making him the world’s wealthiest man. The operation to topple the Czar, in 1917, and install a communist government in Moscow was a British/Rothschild operation.  New York and the Rockefellers also joined London in this, but with another aim: and that was to neutralize the heavy competition that Russian resources – especially oil- that was becoming a problem for the Rockefeller’s oil business. Remember the family motto – “Competition is a sin”.

 With the installation of a communist government, Rockefeller oil companies achieved their aim. They managed to lend money to the Bolsheviks, in return for deals in oil extraction and refining. Besides oil, New York also gained considerable economic and financial advantages.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, both the families looted Russia dry. It was only with the coming to power of Putin, that the tide began to turn. By 2003, Putin became a thorn in the side of both families. Since then, he has been demonized in the West. It was only in December 2016, that Kissinger and Putin struck a secret deal. The essence of this deal was explained by Kissinger, and is as follows: – “we both have common enemies, the British, and we need to unite against them. If you agree, then we can help you to secure geopolitical advantages in various regions of the world. Also, by the same token, be wary of China and Iran, as both cannot be trusted – – – “There was much more, but Putin and Kissinger came to terms.

Why are the Rockefellers so keen on controlling Russia? Here is the short answer.

 The commercial drilling of oil began in the US in 1860. In Russia, it began a few years later, in Baku, Azerbaijaan.  Between 1880, Russian oil production shot up, year after year, and it broke the Rockefeller’s oil monopoly. The same thing was taking place across the entire raw materials sector. A country that could out-produce the US had to be brought under control. This happened when the Bolsheviks took power in 1918. Thereafter, Russian production of oil and other metals were in the hands of the 2 families.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the country was looted by the networks of the 2 families. When Putin assumed power in 2000, he took back control of Russia’s oil and metals sectors by reducing the influence of these two families, and built up Russian companies controlled by Russian nationalists.

In order to control Europe, Russia’s main customer, it was important to control Russia. Over the past 18 years, NATO has crept up to Russia’s western borders. Putin has put enough defensive measures to protect itself here, but is still pretty vulnerable on its southern and eastern borders. In part 2 of this article, we will focus on these two borders.

The Middle East

With the collapse in oil prices due to the economic lockdown, the Persian Gulf oil exporting countries have found themselves in an even tougher situation. And there is no hope on the horizon for any of them – especially for the next few years. Fault lines have developed over the past 10 years in the region – egged on by the US.

The emergence of these fault lines will likely force the United States to shift its attention inward, and become more isolationist, as per the “Fortress America “game-plan. An even more drastic American disengagement from the Middle East is hence to be expected in the coming months.

This will have immediate consequences at the GCC level. Lacking the presence of an external security guarantor able to secure the GCC both from external threats and internal power dynamics, the security fears of smaller GCC states are likely to accelerate, as Saudi Arabia and the UAE will continue vying for dominance within the bloc.

 In this context, it was but a natural outcome to see the UAE and Bahrain signing economic and intelligence deals with Israel, after opening up diplomatic relations with it. The Arab oil exporters are worried about their security knowing that America is reducing its firepower in the region, and taking note of Iran’s recent 25 year agreement with China covering oil and economic deals, with Russia providing Iran with military equipment, to safeguard China’s investment in Iran.

The Strait of Hormuz

 China will be developing a port at Jask, located just outside the Strait of Hormuz, which is the entrance to the Persian Gulf. With China developing and managing a port at a strategic location, it will add massively to Iran’s naval power and give the former a vantage point in a region which has, in recent history, been dominated by the US. Even today, the US Fifth Fleet, headquartered in Bahrain, uses the same passage.

Iran, as far as its immediate interests are concerned, is eyeing to use Jask as an alternative route of oil supply. What this practically means is that in the wake increasing hostilities between Iran and its regional rivals and even the US, Iran can safely shut the Strait down without jeopardising its own oil exports.

Towards a ‘Golden Ring’

Iran’s ambassador to Pakistan has frequently spoken of creating a ‘Golden Ring’, connecting the Chabahar port with Gwadar port in Pakistan. The idea of a ‘Golden Ring’ also has Russia—already strongly present in Syria— as one of its members, which shows that a new regional configuration, with two super powers in it, thus will alter the regional balance of power in a very significant way, changing the almost static post Second World War geo-political landscape.

The manner in which the Golden Ring is developing is evident from the way Russia and China, reinforcing their ties with Iran, are already at the heart of blocking US attempts to reimpose arms embargoes on Iran in coming October. Secondly, The Sino-Iran deal has been announced at a time when the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has regained pace in Pakistan after almost two years of lull and inactivity, indicating how a new geography of trade and connectivity at the heart of the ‘Golden Ring’ is being built, eyeing a radically re-shaped regional geo-political landscape.

Iran stands to gain from it. It has been repeatedly ditched by ‘the West’; consolidating relations with ‘the East’ will allow Iran to redefine its standing in global power relations.

 This is one factor that the US will not allow. Iran must not be allowed to leverage its energy resources to benefit China. The US has plans to derail Iran’s energy and geopolitical ambitions.

 To summarize all of the above, let’s recap the main points.

• Russia is an energy and raw materials colossus, with a military that can stand up to the West. It has to be broken- up in order for it not to be a problem for New York in the future.
• China is an emerging economic giant, and left unchecked, it has a good chance to de-throne America’s global dominance. Its weak link is its reliance on imported energy via maritime routes that is subject to a possible US Naval blockade. Another weak link within China Inc is its weak internal financial power. These two factors combined make China vulnerable to US attacks on its economy.
• Venezuela is about to fall as its economy is groaning under US sanctions.
• Iran is in the same position as Venezuela, but it is surviving thanks to Chinese and Russian support.
• Europe is in the worst possible shape. Fearful of its future energy supplies, it’s rapidly decreasing technological and economic strengths, and under constant attack by the US, it has lost direction as a cohesive power.
• The worst off is the Middle East.  The region has lost the support of the US, and its key leaders are floundering in the dark, looking for guidance, support and direction. And, very conveniently, the US pushed them into Israel’s deadly embrace. Whenever Israel (a Rothschild project), embraces a country, it acts like a parasite, and then the very lifeblood of that country is sucked out. Israel follows one key principle of the Rothschilds’ – “what’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is negotiable”. And by this means, the US has ensured that the pieces are all falling into place for the coming “blow-up “of this region.

 In part 2 of this article, we will discuss precisely how America intends to maintain its global dominance by destroying all its rivals.